Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Rebelian: The Ame Damnee. ໒꒱ིྀ༝⁺

Channel

Rebelian: The Ame Damnee. ໒꒱ིྀ༝⁺

@rebeIian

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

819subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003483810910
TypeChannel
Username@rebeIian
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 9 December 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/rebeIian

Growth

81982982410 August 2026 — 829 subscribers11 August 2026 — 828 subscribers19 August 2026 — 819 subscribers10 August 202619 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 818–831 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Aug 2026, 07:47819-9
11 Aug 2026, 16:25828-1
10 Aug 2026, 20:46829first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 9 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

364 reactions across 5 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53259394705942376517019.2%
custom 53259384913416954096919.0%
custom 53234523581123385696618.1%
custom 53258958594963162906618.1%
custom 53257060176468652286517.9%
❤‍🔥71.92%
51.37%
🎉41.10%
🐳41.10%
👻41.10%
🕊41.10%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 364reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 9 December 2025 to 4 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jun 2026, 04:24 UTC≈3,570 viewsread 10 August 2026

‌ ‌ ‌ ‌‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ۪ ֺ ۪ ‌ ‌‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ 𝅦𝅦 ‌ྀ ׁ ִ ˖‌ ࣪ ۪ 𝓻𝓮𝓫𝓮𝓵𝓲𝓪𝓷’𝓼 𝓬𝓪𝓵𝓵 ֪ ঌ …🪽💮 moonbeams weave through petal haze, lotus blooms exhale silver sighs, gentle breezes carry hidden wishes. lotus light dreams shimmer. feathers drift amid starry veils, souls hum with lyrical warmth and enchanted rhyme. sanctuary for bold visionaries and night wanderers. voices rise, echoes like:

17 Dec 2025, 10:00 UTC704 views82 reactionsread 10 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 532345235811233856917custom 532589585949631629017custom 532593849134169540917custom 532593947059423765117custom 532570601764686522814

17 Dec 2025, 10:00 UTC798 views89 reactionsread 10 August 2026

︶ִ⏝ ︶ 𝆹𝅥 𝆭 ׅ ྀི ︵֟፝⏜ׄ ׅ ︩︪♥️🐑 ׄ ₊ the fallen seraph drifts through twilight realms. ༻༾ her once-luminous wings touched by quiet sorrow. 🪽𓉯ྀ beside her, the lotus dreamer reclines in tranquil haze. ░░░░░░░░░░░░ྀི ᩤ᭔ 𝄠 ꒰ᩧ💮৯ ˚. * They said: “REBELIAN DANCES WITH FADING LIGHT'S EMBRACE.” 𝓖ently surrendered to the flower’s soothing charm. Together, they embody the tender paradox of relinquishme

custom 532345235811233856918custom 532589585949631629018custom 532593849134169540918custom 532593947059423765118custom 532570601764686522817

17 Dec 2025, 10:00 UTC668 views96 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

ㅤ ㅤ ྀ♥︎‌ ⬚‌ 𝓕orsaken wings falter... 🎹༿ີ۪۪

custom 532589585949631629020custom 532593849134169540920custom 532593947059423765120custom 532570601764686522819custom 532345235811233856917

17 Dec 2025, 09:55 UTC748 views69 reactionsread 10 August 2026

ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ

custom 532570601764686522815custom 532593947059423765115custom 532345235811233856914custom 532593849134169540914custom 532589585949631629011

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @rebeIian. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 485,752 of 1,563,849entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Rebelian: The Ame Damnee. ໒꒱ིྀ༝⁺” (@rebeIian), 819 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rebeIian.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.