Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

REBALANCER | TON

@rebalancer_ton

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,156subscribers

-27 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001597152645
TypeChannel
Username@rebalancer_ton
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/rebalancer_ton

Growth

2,1562,1832,169.56 August 2026 — 2,183 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,183 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,182 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,174 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,166 subscribers15 August 2026 — 2,156 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net -27. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,152–2,187 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 19:162,156-10
12 Aug 2026, 12:442,166-8
9 Aug 2026, 07:542,174-8
6 Aug 2026, 12:212,182-1
6 Aug 2026, 06:052,183no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:242,183first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

367 reactions across 20 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💊7420.2%
😁3910.6%
👍369.81%
🔥267.08%
🗿225.99%
💅154.09%
😎123.27%
🤝113.00%
🦄113.00%
102.72%
👌102.72%
🫡102.72%
🆒92.45%
🤪92.45%
🤗82.18%
🎉71.91%
🏆61.63%
👏61.63%
💘61.63%
🍓51.36%
9 further kinds359.54%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 367reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2025 to 19 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2025, 14:38 UTC837 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Регулярно приходят покупки REBA без рекламы. Похоже, люди просто смотрят в ренже токены и скупают всё подряд в надежде, что какая-то монета выстрелит. Мы тоже так делали: раскидываешь по $50–100 — глядишь, может и повезёт.

💊9😁3🤪2🗿1

17 Jul 2025, 16:50 UTC≈1,180 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Где ты сейчас?

  1. Я только на ТОНе46%
  2. У меня много разных монеток из разных блокчейнов54%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🏆3🍓2🆒2👏1💯1🤗1🤩1🤪1

17 Jul 2025, 16:48 UTC≈1,120 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Обратили внимание, что доминация биткоина снижается? Из-за этого начали активно расти монеты с большой капитализацией. Наше предположение: чем ниже доминация, тем больше денег уходит в альты. Надеемся, что и ТОНу что-то перепадёт 😄

😁3🔥2🎉1🏆1👌1💅1💯1🤗1

16 Jul 2025, 09:31 UTC810 views50 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Привет, ребята! Продолжаем двигаться вперёд и делимся с вами ключевыми новостями по проекту: 1. Где мы сейчас: – Мы изначально и до сих пор действуем честно и прозрачно — в интересах проекта и комьюнити. – Несмотря на вызовы, REBA жив и развивается. Токен доступен для обмена на двух биржах: можно свободно конвертировать REBA ⇄ TON. 2. Технологический трек: – Мы провели тестирование механики ребалансировок, но в

🔥15😁10👍8💊82🗿2🍓1🐳1

5 Jul 2025, 09:06 UTC659 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🧠 Немного мыслей о рынке и о нас Кажется, сейчас мы переживаем ту самую фазу, которую в крипте принято называть «затишьем перед чем-то». Каждый день появляются десятки новых проектов — и почти столько же быстро исчезают. Кто-то загорается на энтузиазме, кто-то — ради хайпа, а кто-то — потому что просто хочется попробовать. И это нормально. Web3 — это среда экспериментов. Здесь нет стабильных путей, здесь все идут о

🤝7💊6👍3🗿31❤‍🔥1🍾1🐳1

3 Jun 2025, 18:06 UTC847 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Такая картина 💊

💊8🫡6🗿4🎉2💅2🍾1👍1🤪1

29 May 2025, 14:27 UTC949 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Подходящие условия для роста в экосистеме - ТОN, простым языком: Будет все расти = ТОN тоже вырастет 🙌

💊8😁5🗿2🆒2🍓1👍1👏1💅1

19 May 2025, 11:46 UTC≈1,120 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

EQBYk9Rp8jgFmxE6XIIOiPJSxObAwt6DdThRdTP7t3JQhcTz

👍31🎉1👌1💅1💊1😎1🆒1

19 May 2025, 11:46 UTC≈1,100 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📈 19 мая График колбасит Цена за 1 млн: $110

2🔥2🍾1🏆1💅1💊1💯1🗿1

16 May 2025, 10:18 UTC≈1,090 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Как настрой?

  1. +48%
  2. -52%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👌5💊5💘2😁21❤‍🔥1🏆1🔥1

15 May 2025, 09:56 UTC899 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

If you can't suppress a rebellion, lead it

👍2🔥21🍾1🐳1👌1👏1💊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rebalancer_ton. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

17 Jul 2025, 16:50 UTCAnonymous Poll79 voters

Где ты сейчас?

  1. Я только на ТОНе46%
  2. У меня много разных монеток из разных блокчейнов54%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 May 2025, 10:18 UTCAnonymous Poll89 voters

Как настрой?

  1. +48%
  2. -52%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2025 to 19 August 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 192,945 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“REBALANCER | TON” (@rebalancer_ton), 2,156 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rebalancer_ton.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.