5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,793–1,829 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 05:34
1,797
-11
10 Aug 2026, 04:52
1,808
-10
7 Aug 2026, 02:45
1,818
-7
6 Aug 2026, 08:20
1,825
no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:19
1,825
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 9 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
142 reactions across 15 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
44
31.0%
🔥
39
27.5%
❤🔥
14
9.86%
🏆
10
7.04%
⚡
9
6.34%
❤
9
6.34%
🤩
5
3.52%
🤝
3
2.11%
🦄
3
2.11%
👏
2
1.41%
🍾
1
0.704%
💘
1
0.704%
😁
1
0.704%
🙈
1
0.704%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 142reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 October 2024 to 17 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
32
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 19 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
20
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rebalancer_en. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 October 2024 to 17 January 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Guys, good news on TAU!
Resuming farming with great interest rates! 🔥
We are pouring 20 million TAU into farming for 3 months.
If your TAUs are just lying around - this is a great opportunity!
Come in and be the first to take over 200% yield!
FARMING here 👉 https://dedust.io/pools/EQDkWuzopj3mNcjGFkMlzPZewZp1XYIf1YiNcaneR4xggDWD
Almost finished SWAP for favorable exchange rate. So far it doesn't look as we would like it to. We are fighting with programmers to make everything work and look as it was designed.
Here is the beta version, you can poke around: [ https://reba-swap.vercel.app ]
🔥 Holding? Start Farming! 🔥
If you’re holding LIBRA, REBA, or TAU, why wait? Make your assets work for you! 💸
🔹 Top farming opportunities for you:
1️⃣ TAU Farming on DeDust
- 🤑 APR up to 570%
- 👉 [Start farming here](https://dedust.io/pools?search=tau&sort=apr-DESC)
2️⃣ TAU Farming & Staking on Jvault
- Three farming pools available:
- [TAU-REBA](https://jvault.xyz/staking/v2/stake/TAU-REBA)
- [TAU-TON](htt…
✈️ Gaining Momentum!
If not through the door, then through the window — we always find a way forward.
We are constantly seeking new approaches to solve challenges and move ahead. Exciting news and new partnerships are on the horizon!
Our team is currently focused on five key areas:
1. Developing a DEX and integrating a swap feature for seamless token exchanges.
2. Enhancing the faucet with bonuses for holding tok…
🙃 REBA and 🚀 TAU
The ideal entry point
We are now at the ideal entry point for the Rebalancer project. As experienced participants know, the cycle in the cryptocurrency market repeats itself, and it's at times like this that solid foundations for future growth are laid.
Why now.
At the current stage, REBA and TAU provide unique opportunities for those who are willing to make strategic investments. The token price …
🤖 Bulls, Get Hyped❗️ REBALANCER, the Power Player on TON, Has Landed. 🚀
We’re thrilled to announce that REBA, the ultimate symbol of strength and synergy in the TON space, has officially partnered with Diamond Bull Technology ❗️
DIAMOND BULL 🤖 x REBALANCER ✈️ A Collaboration Packed with Purpose and Potential. ⚡️🔥
For the next 7️⃣ days, seize your chance and add $REBA pool to your portfolio with 0️⃣% trading fees …
Let's burn TAU 🔥
We will burn all received commissions to the price of 1 cent 😁 (and not what you thought)
If you do not like TAU - you can safely sell and forget about this coin (but I would not advise it, because the application will have tasks with TAU). The more you sell/buy, the more we burn
👉 And in general, we have big plans for TAU, and no negative moods will stop us from moving towards our goals and imple…
We continue the challenge to increase liquidity in our TAU pools 📈
Last time we successfully reached the $50k mark in the TAU/REBA pool after the rewards were uploaded
🔥 This time we are accumulating liquidity in the TAU/LIBRA pool - now it has only $2k of liquidity
We remind you that we are working on an application with tasks, the main payment for which will be the LIBRA coin. We see that many people have purcha…
#REBALANCER
Our goal with $REBA was to create at least 100 liquidity pools - this was the basis of our project, with which we entered the market. Many people were surprised that no one had gotten to this idea before. The concept allowed us to rise quickly: investors actively invested, and our capitalization grew from $1000 to 1 million dollars. Each new pool strengthened liquidity and contributed to growth.
Reasons…
TAU/JVT, TAU/IVS and TAU/BOLT - new TAU boosts 🥳
Launched boosts with the specified pools
✔️ We have been cooperating with Jvault for a long time, using the steaking service, and now we have added boosts for 2 months
✔️ IVS is a token of Stalin Foundation project (https://t.me/StalinFoundation). It has everything: an app, strong community and new developments
✔️ BOLT - token from Bolt Foundation (https://t.me/dai…
👍5❤🔥3🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @rebalancer_en. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 735,596 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@rebalancer_en named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@tentacleton named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“REBALANCER | TON en” (@rebalancer_en), 1,797 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rebalancer_en.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.