Channel
@realvinness
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
210subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001900937102 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @realvinness |
| Created | 24 August 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/realvinness |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:28 | 210 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:32 | 214 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 214 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 24 August 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
156 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤡 | 56 | 35.9% | |
| 💩 | 29 | 18.6% | |
| 🤮 | 29 | 18.6% | |
| 🤣 | 22 | 14.1% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 5.13% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 3.21% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 2.56% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 1.28% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.641% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 156reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 24 August 2023 to 19 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Official Statement of Congratulations On the Appointment of Sir Vinness Aisingioro Ollervides As Trade Commissioner of the Republic of Vanuatu to Japan It is with great respect and sincere congratulations that we recognize the official appointment of Sir.Vinness Aisingioro Ollervides as the Trade Commissioner of the Republic of Vanuatu to Japan. This appointment marks a significant milestone in strengthening the bi…
💩3👏1
https://www.dailypost.vu/news/trade-commissioner-to-tokyo-waiting-for-his-diplomatic-passport/article_22fef938-99c8-50ee-840d-ce628fb4d08a.html
Photo, posted without a caption
https://www.epochtimes.com/b5/24/7/12/n14289577.htm
富人最多可以做到為富不仁，而窮人為了錢甚至可能走向極端。 貧窮與愚昧，皆為原罪。
🤣7💩4😁3👎2
伊啓威Vinness.A.Ollervides🅥 pinned a photo
一個人要拼搏奮鬥，動力絕不來自於敬重，而是恐懼。 恐懼於一無所有間誕生泱泱帝國，於亂世狼煙中催生惶惶革命。 是的，我恐懼被同化成「同胞」一樣的家畜「中國人」：醜陋、陰暗、弱小、貪婪、愚蠢而又精於算計和自負。 這也堅定了我對政治以及權力的信仰。
🤣7💩4👍1
如果有质疑者问：“你都做了什么？抛开家族背景和年少时的精英人设，其实也没做什么多了不起的事情。 - 2019年：最早揭露中共百亿黄金腐败事件，并预言经济暴雷的吹哨者。 - 2020年：Trump选举团队中唯一的亚裔爆料者及团队协助者。 - 2022年：参与俄乌战争，成为首批国际外籍军团的军人。 - 2022-2023年：在中共二十大政变中担任代理人之一，策划并领导了自1989年天安门事件以来最大的抗议活动——「白纸革命」 - 2024年：成立亚洲最大半官方情报组织Hashleaks，并担任中国最大的在野政党党魁。 除此之外，还作为多位女性的伴侣及四个孩子的父亲，成功经营四家公司。 与其关注别人说了什么，不如多看他的实际成果。
🤡21🤣3😁2
希望能有獨立思考能力，而不是單純想著共產黨壞壞，坦克**我全家或者是西方民主大法好的兩極化思維。 但是幾千年的歷史告訴我們，這個世界的更多的是大腦🧠被活摘了且隨波逐流的烏合之眾🤷
🤡15🤣5💩3
對於紀念六四，你們認為？
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
雖然這麼說會引起一堆人不爽，但是我還是想說。 又快到「天安門消消樂X坦克闔家歡」三十五週年紀念日活動了‼️老民逗帶著小民逗們一年一度表演的日子又要來了！ 藉此因為對民主自由的無限憧憬，給六四獻網圖一張。 對於六四我立場一直都沒變，我站共產黨（認真） 失敗了的Loser就是Loser，紀念什麼？想奪得政權靠的是鐵血政策而不是書生造反。
🤮12❤1
MOOD
🤮5
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @realvinness. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
對於紀念六四，你們認為？
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 24 August 2023 to 19 April 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 485,860 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“伊啓威Vinness.A.Ollervides🅥” (@realvinness), 210 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/realvinness.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.