Channel
@realtokendao
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
799subscribers
-13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002198031175 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @realtokendao |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/realtokendao |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Oct 2026, 20:36 | 799 | -4 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 04:18 | 803 | -2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 02:15 | 805 | -4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:58 | 809 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 810 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 811 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 812 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:38 | 812 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
154 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 57 | 37.0% | |
| 👍 | 56 | 36.4% | |
| 👎 | 29 | 18.8% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 2.60% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 1.95% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.30% | |
| 🌭 | 1 | 0.649% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.649% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.649% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 154 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 April 2026 to 19 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎉 Proposal Result! [RIP00047] Voting power derived solely from Gnosis 🔗 View proposal on Tally 📝 Proposal Summary: Voting power calculations will henceforth be based solely on REG tokens held on the Gnosis blockchain. The REG token is available on two other blockchains: Ethereum and Polygon. REG holdings on these two blockchains will no longer be included in the voting power calculation. 📊 Voting Results: 🟩 For: …
🗳 Voting Reminder! [RIP00047] Voting power derived solely from Gnosis A proposal is live and needs your vote. 📌 Purpose Voting power calculations will henceforth be based solely on REG tokens held on the Gnosis blockchain. The REG token is currently available on Ethereum and Polygon, however, if this proposal passes, holdings on these two blockchains will no longer be included in the voting power calculation. 👉 C…
❤1👍1
📨 New Proposal created! [RIP00047] Voting power derived solely from Gnosis 🔗 View proposal on Tally 📝 Proposal Summary: Voting power calculations will henceforth be based solely on REG tokens held on the Gnosis blockchain. The REG token is available on two other blockchains: Ethereum and Polygon. REG holdings on these two blockchains will no longer be included in the voting power calculation. 🟢 Voting starts: Sun…
🎉 Proposal Result! [RIP00046] Maximum borrowing rate stablecoins increased in stages up to 27.5% 🔗 View proposal on Tally 📝 Proposal Summary: Question submitted to the vote: Do you agree to gradually increase the maximum borrowing rate for RMM stablecoins by 9% APR every 15 days, starting from the current 9.5% up to the initial maximum rate of 27.5% APR? If rejected, the rate will remain at 9.5% APR. 📊 Voting Re…
👍7😢3👎1😁1
🎉 Proposal Result! [RIP00045] Maximum borrowing rate on RMM for stablecoins reduced to 7.94% 🔗 View proposal on Tally 📝 Proposal Summary: Question submitted to the vote: Do you agree to adjust the stablecoin borrow-curve settings for RMM USDC and WXDAI to target 7.94% APR at 100% usage through October 31, 2026? This involves setting the base variable borrow rate to 7.50%, variable slope 1 to 0.00%, optimal usage r…
👍7👎3🌭1
🗳️ Voting Reminder! [RIP00045] Maximum borrowing rate on RMM for stablecoins reduced to 7.94% A proposal is live and needs your vote. 📌 Purpose This proposal requests a temporary stablecoin borrow-curve setting for the current RMM USDC and WXDAI reserves targeting 7.94% APR at 100% usage, or about 8.26% APY, through October 31, 2026. Under the current live curve structure, this means keeping base variable borrow r…
🗳️ Voting Reminder! [RIP00046] Maximum borrowing rate stablecoins increased in stages up to 27.5% A proposal is live and needs your vote. 📌 Purpose In accordance with RIPs 40, 42, 43, and 44: It is proposed to gradually increase the maximum borrowing rate for RMM stablecoins by 9% APR every 15 days, starting from the current value (9.5% - RIP 42) and up to the initial maximum rate (27.5% APR). If this proposal is …
📢 RMM Governance: Votes are live on Tally! Two conflicting proposals (RIP 00045 and RIP 00046) regarding stablecoin borrowing rates are currently up for vote. [RIP00045] Reduce max stablecoin borrow rate to 7.94% - Objective: Keep rates manageable for borrowers while preserving positive incentives for depositors. - Details: Targets a 7.94% APR at 100% usage through October 31, 2026 (reassessment date). [RIP00046] …
🔥2
🚀 RMM version 3.5 is now available! You can now convert your borrowings into REUSD debt at 0%. 👉 A tutorial is directly accessible in the interface (see the arrow) ⚠️ Note: the convertible amount is initially limited to $100, with a gradual increase planned every 15 days. 🙏 A big thank you to the development teams for their work, as well as to the entire community for their continued support! 🐦 X: https://x.com/…
🔥12👍5👎2👏2🤣1
🎉 Proposal Result! [RIP00044] Temporary RMM Stablecoin Rate Pause Until v3.5 Step 1 🔗 View proposal on Tally 📝 Proposal Summary: Question submitted to the vote: Do you agree to the following: zero interest on loans on the RMM (Real Estate Monetary Market) until the launch of Step 1 of RMM v3.5 + 3 weeks, or at the latest until June 30, 2026, whichever comes first, which would reduce interest on deposits to zero du…
👍23👎2
🗳 Voting Reminder! [RIP00044] Temporary RMM Stablecoin Rate Pause Until v3.5 Step 1 A proposal is live and needs your vote. 📌 Purpose Question submitted to the vote: Do you agree to the following: zero interest on loans on the RMM (Real Estate Monetary Market) until the launch of Step 1 of RMM v3.5 + 3 weeks, or at the latest until June 30, 2026, whichever comes first, which would reduce interest on deposits to ze…
👎5👍1
🎉 Proposal Result! [RIP00043] First parameter of RMM v3.5, Final Votes 🔗 https://www.tally.xyz/gov/realtoken-ecosystem-governance/proposal/640910280800835192023262285687656568134775170449659841348595080639880745966 Proposal Summary: Following the RIP 40 vote on the principles and the launch of development for version 3.5 of the RMM, this proposal approves an initial version of the parameters for Phase 1 of this ve…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @realtokendao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RealToken DAO - Announcement” (@realtokendao), 799 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/realtokendao.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.