Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Tina Peters 🇺🇸 Whistleblower of fallen Navy SEAL

Channel

Tina Peters 🇺🇸 Whistleblower of fallen Navy SEAL

@realtinapeters

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,040subscribers

+1,024 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003934457431
TypeChannel
Username@realtinapeters
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 14 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 September 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/realtinapeters

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

161,0405287 August 2026 — 16 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,036 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,037 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,038 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,039 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,040 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,040 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,039 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,040 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
9 measurements spanning 39 days, net +1,024. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 07:401,040+1
11 Sept 2026, 15:401,039-1
10 Sept 2026, 21:221,040no change
6 Sept 2026, 15:191,040+1
2 Sept 2026, 12:141,039+1
24 Aug 2026, 20:041,038+1
21 Aug 2026, 03:031,037+1
15 Aug 2026, 02:251,036+1,020
7 Aug 2026, 01:1816first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.43%
avg views ÷ 1,040 subscribers
Avg views / post
14.9
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026
Posts held20 (14 August 20269 September 2026)
Views total119
Reactions total3
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Sept 2026, 21:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 13s
Average length
1m 44s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
375.0%
🔥125.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2026 to 9 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Sept 2026, 06:22 UTC6 views1 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Video

At the RNC and then spending my birthday at the Storm Summit! Come celebrate!

1

31 Aug 2026, 12:42 UTC25 viewsread 10 September 2026

5%audit AFTER the election is NOT enough to combat the electronic cheating and mail in ballots😡 Midterms are here- MrPresident YOU already have all the authority we need -time for the Tina Plan https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/emb6am-homeland-security-warns-chinese-parts-election-machines-require @realDonaldTrump @EagleEdMartin @howardlutnick @CISAgov @JustTheNews

30 Aug 2026, 06:27 UTC21 viewsread 10 September 2026
Forwarded from @AnnVandersteelxPhoto

☎️Call President Trump and ask him to implement the Tina Peters 2026 Election Security Plan 🙏

30 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC16 viewsread 10 September 2026

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/08/dhs-secretary-markwayne-mullin-orders-mandatory-random-paper/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=5918 According to letter to CISA BY Phd Phillip Stark “does NOT suffice to ensure accuracy and detect machine errors or manipulation “ Please refer to The Tina Peters plan at Tina Peters . US

28 Aug 2026, 07:23 UTC12 views2 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Video

THE PLAN to save our Country and there’s nothing the Left can do about it! We already have the authority! Now comes the courage to act, D.C! There IS time Are you going to do it? My team stands ready to help @realDonaldTrump @EagleEdMartin @SecMullinDHS @howardlutnick @jsolomonReports

2

28 Aug 2026, 07:18 UTC11 viewsread 10 September 2026

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/08/dhs-secretary-markwayne-mullin-orders-mandatory-random-paper/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=5918 According to letter to CISA BY Phd Phillip Stark “does NOT suffice to ensure accuracy and detect machine errors or manipulation “ Please refer to The Tina Peters plan at Tina Peters . US

23 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC12 viewsread 10 September 2026

Colorado’s Secretary of State Jena Griswold spent public money, then fought an open-records request over what that money produced. A judge has now ordered them to get the records — and called their excuse “implausible.” If taxpayers paid for it, taxpayers deserve to see https://www.cbsnews.com/colorado/news/public-records-secretary-of-state-judge-order-colorado/

22 Aug 2026, 07:26 UTC14 viewsread 10 September 2026
Photo

Please give. She was there for me, too when I was in prison. She and her family have sacrificed much for this country in love, support under persecution. Please help ❣️ https://www.givesendgo.com/after-emergency-surgery-nicole-needs-our

22 Aug 2026, 07:20 UTC11 viewsread 10 September 2026

Oh the leftist @denverpost is working hard to STILL try to make EVERYTHING Trump's fault. From my release to the wildfires in Meeker that 60 Minutes will soon air along with their opinion of me. They are trying to make my release look like part of Trump/Polis/federal-government chess, while also highlighting my continued election-integrity work and possible Shasta County role. The useful part for me is this: they a

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @realtinapeters. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Tina Peters 🇺🇸 Whistleblower of fallen Navy SEAL” (@realtinapeters), 1,040 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/realtinapeters.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.