Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ильгиз Сабиров

Channel

Ильгиз Сабиров

@real_sabirov

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,248subscribers

-513 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001827580993
TypeChannel
Username@real_sabirov
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/real_sabirov

Growth

12,24812,76112,504.57 August 2026 — 12,761 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,761 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,745 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,717 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,680 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,651 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,633 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,619 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,570 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,539 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,524 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,512 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,499 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,486 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,470 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,451 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,435 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,423 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,413 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,387 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,379 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,360 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,349 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,336 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,318 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,297 subscribers4 September 2026 — 12,282 subscribers7 September 2026 — 12,248 subscribers7 August 20267 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 31 days, net -513. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,171–12,838 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 01:3712,248-34
4 Sept 2026, 09:3912,282-15
3 Sept 2026, 00:3712,297-21
1 Sept 2026, 23:3412,318-18
31 Aug 2026, 21:4612,336-13
30 Aug 2026, 21:2812,349-11
29 Aug 2026, 18:4312,360-19
28 Aug 2026, 16:3212,379-8
27 Aug 2026, 14:4412,387-26
26 Aug 2026, 17:2312,413-10
25 Aug 2026, 18:1112,423-12
24 Aug 2026, 15:4512,435-16
23 Aug 2026, 00:5412,451-19
21 Aug 2026, 12:0312,470-16
20 Aug 2026, 10:1312,486-13
19 Aug 2026, 10:2712,499-13
18 Aug 2026, 08:4212,512-12
17 Aug 2026, 09:3412,524-15
15 Aug 2026, 15:2612,539-31
14 Aug 2026, 01:0412,570first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 27 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.09%
avg views ÷ 12,248 subscribers
Avg views / post
623
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.61%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held26 (27 June 20262 September 2026)
Views total2,493
Reactions total65
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 22:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

631 reactions across 26 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
21433.9%
🔥21033.3%
🤯7311.6%
👍589.19%
💊589.19%
👏182.85%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 631 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 26 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @real_sabirov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 26 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 June 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 13:40 UTC191 views13 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @nailsdobrayaPhoto

Минус 12 кг за 10 дней Закончился детокс за 10 дней и это самые рекордные результаты, которые я видела Как я уже сказала, это самая лучшая программа, которую я теперь не только продаю, но и сама прохожу 2 раза в год Только посмотрите, как тело может измениться за такой короткий срок Все отзывы опубликую на отдельном сайте. Один из участников аж 12 кг сбросил. Сначала я не хотела брать мужчин в поток, а сейчас рад

🔥6💊42👍1

27 Aug 2026, 08:28 UTC596 views15 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @nailsdobrayaPhoto

Прошло ровно 5 дней детокса и впереди еще 5 дней Мы еще программу не закончили, а у людей уже улучшается сон, кожа, аппетит, многие начинают своих мужей и жен подсаживать даже на него Один из участников уже почти 10 кг скинул А самые лучшие результаты начинаются только на 10 день детокса! Сижу, читаю чат и понимаю, что это самая лучшая программа, которую я делала, самые классные участники и участницы 😌 Следующий

🔥8💊43

27 Aug 2026, 08:28 UTC536 views11 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Вот поэтому пока постов нет, с Аделей все свое внимание отдаем сейчас 2м вещам: 1. Провождение детокса 2. Обучение по выявлению и предотвращению распространенных проблем желудка и кишечника + по кровяному давлению Все, времени пока больше ни на что нет. Единственное, на человека паука только смогли сходить

🔥62👏2💊1

13 Aug 2026, 07:30 UTC≈1,170 views26 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥177💊2

10 Aug 2026, 10:58 UTC≈1,440 views36 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Вы никогда не пожалеете: о прогулке, о раннем отходе ко сну, о выборе полезной пищи, о том, что отказываетесь от того, что вас истощает. 👆

23🔥13

8 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC≈1,690 views25 reactionsread 2 September 2026

1. Людей, которые похудели на оземпике можно будет легко различать по оземпиковому лицу 2. Появятся новые болезни от оземпика, в которые придется инвестировать деньги 3. Анорексички и РППшницы окажутся в опасности. Сейчас они просто выблевывают еду. А скоро смогут вообще не есть и не ощущать голод. 4. Такие как я, которые помогут худеть быстро, как на оземпике, но без побочек - станут на вес золота. НО! Их услугами б

17🔥4👍3💊1

8 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC≈1,110 views16 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Плюсы и минусы оземпика (с цифрами) 📓Недавно послушал книгу исследовательницы об оземпике и узнал, что к 2032 году уже 120 000 000 Американцев будут колоть в животик LGP-1 А сегодня уже в США оземпик и его аналоги раздают налево и направо. Много звезд сидят на нем, например, Илон Маск 💉Также оземпик дают по медицинской страховке, как лекарство от болезни, под названием "Ожирение" Но если вы думаете, что просто пр

🔥95💊2

6 Aug 2026, 13:39 UTC884 views23 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

😂Смех обладает противовоспалительным действием. 😭Плач регулирует работу мозга. 🫂Объятия защищают иммунитет. 🎵Пение тонизирует блуждающий нерв. 💃Танцы оказывают нейрогенное воздействие. 🌱 Радость — биологическая необходимость. Приходите на Мастер-Класс 8 августа, нас уже суммарно 500 человек собралось. Такое событие проходит 1 раз в жизни

👍145🔥3💊1

5 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC929 views14 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Лишний вес влияет на уровень зарплаты Аделя в этом посте хорошо подметила, как с уходом лишнего веса приходят новые возможности и зарплаты Точно рекомендую почитать, если вам кажется, что топчитесь на месте в карьерном плане

8💊4🔥2

4 Aug 2026, 17:04 UTC997 views18 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥9👏43💊2

3 Aug 2026, 14:08 UTC979 views21 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

На диетах похудеть невозможно и это факт Уже в 21 веке неоднократно брали более 20 популярных диет, держали на них людей и во всех них была одна общая черта: • Люди худели на каждой диете. Просто на некоторых быстрее, на других медленнее. "Кстати, именно на той диете, которую пропогандирую я, худели сильнее всего" Как итог, через 6-12 месяцев, худение останавливалось и люди снова набирали вес, даже если продолжал

9🔥6💊5👏1

2 Aug 2026, 18:10 UTC908 views24 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @nailsdobrayaPhoto

Ну все, объявляю точную дату Мастер-класс по детоксу пройдет 8 августа в 18:00 Название детокса "Кнопка перезагрузки метаболизма" Внутри расскажу, какие 3 точечных шага сделать, чтобы метаболизм обновился и жир горел Уже завтра оставлю здесь ссылку, где можно будет посмотреть Мастер-класс, чтобы точно не пропустить

🔥165👍2💊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @real_sabirov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Проходим курсы, читаем книги, тренинги и спорт
@books_and_trainings · 29,905
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ильгиз Сабиров” (@real_sabirov), 12,248 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/real_sabirov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.