Channel
@realKonohaAkisato
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
22subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001698021793 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @realKonohaAkisato |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/realKonohaAkisato |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 22 | +2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:15 | 20 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:12 | 20 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 31 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (31 March 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 36 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
5 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🥰 | 3 | 60.0% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 40.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 31 March 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
我觉得“词元”这个翻译的公布方式是一个非常非常失败的例子 直接公布一个标准译名，然后各种官媒进行消息轰炸，再把高度上升到科技话语权。 人人都知道这届网友是最逆反的，非得用这种大家长作风式的按头措施来公布这个译名，那现在就相当于把词元这么一个很好的翻译永远的与这次失败关联起来，也永远带上了政治色彩，永远会有一批人拒绝使用这个词。 而如果由deepseek或者moonshot发的我觉得都压根不会有人往那方面想。要做到这一点只需要稍微行政指导一下： 1. 订好了翻译之后找moonshot和deepseek在model card和新闻里用这个词 2. 其它下游软件和生态跟进 3. 国家“顺势”采纳为标准 关键就在于你不能让人觉得自己是被按头的，得让人觉得这是行业里有头有脸的公司提出来的。
https://linux.sb
bw #上海
via 叮〜 ( ꒪ ꒳ ꒪ ) 〜当
Photo, posted without a caption
🥰1
Sticker, posted without a caption
你怎么知道我抢到票了
❤1🥰1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
via Lilim
各位家长、同学： 今天是6月11号，离高考出分还剩最后13天。但我看有些同学，已经提前给自己“毕业”了：开始兴致勃勃地通宵打游戏、规划毕业聚餐、组团旅行。 恕我直言，这不是放松，这叫不知天高地厚。 请你们扪心自问一句——成绩稳到能横着走了吗？录取通知书寄到手了吗？ 如果都没有，那你凭什么松懈？你现在的轻松，不是心态好，是糊涂，是自欺欺人。 我必须把这盆冷水浇到底：高考还没出分，你就还不是准大学生。你现在提前发飘的样子，配不上你嘴上那个想去的大学。 最后的14天，比的不是谁更聪明，而是谁更能沉得住气，谁更能在别人浮躁的时候坐稳那张冷板凳。如果你现在就松了劲，这14天不会等你，它会变成对手甩开你的14天，变成你查分后眼泪决堤的原因。 收起你们那些不合时宜的兴奋，收起提前庆祝的幼稚幻想。把脸上那种“已经解放了”的轻浮表情抹掉。现在还没到笑的时候，笑早了，后面可能会哭得很惨。 把心沉下来，死磕这最后14天。乾坤未定，你还没有资格放松。 …
小米的一堆价值观其实是公开并宣传的,但是不知道为啥，雷总把原始文档的权限没有公开，想看必须向雷总的飞书文档申请阅读。 而众所周知，雷总处理消息的速度非常非常高效。 于是就有人闲着没事想出了损招，想通过这样的方式测一下雷总每天几点上班下班。 最后测出来的结果是: 最晚的一次审批通过，是晚上快12点好像，最早的一次是早上5:00多。 属实是把雷军当超级牛马用了，五十岁正是奋斗的年纪.jpg from Alan的小纸箱
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @realKonohaAkisato. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“秋里コノハ.ch” (@realKonohaAkisato), 22 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/realKonohaAkisato.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.