2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 67–69 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 00:46
68
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:13
68
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 30 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
207
Videos
78
Links
315
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
168 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
88
52.4%
❤
65
38.7%
🔥
14
8.33%
👏
1
0.595%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 168reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2025 to 10 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
I am very happy with the cautiousness of my followers in gamble plays. In the survey I made today, my subscribers are investing around $1000 in gamble plays.
For this reason, I made a low mcap call and so far it seems to be rising very nicely and stable.
Aped a big bag at $GUMBY / Eth
DS: https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x6d63ba1d84500f938d24ea3d37e03f4381da0394
DT: https://www.dextools.io/app/ether/pair-explorer/0x6d63ba1d84500f938d24ea3d37e03f4381da0394
CA: 0x6D63BA1D84500F938D24EA3D37e03F4381da0394
I wanted to gamble and try on this Matt Furie narrative after 10s of recent launches. I like it more than all others tbh and as always I am first calling it.
So w…
Remember the $SPECT call on 17 November 2023 ? It was at 500k
https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0x8a6d9525a0f07dcdc17fff15644342c314025a80?t=1746894088737
ATH was 68 million which means 136x
Today hit back to 35 million now. It's the most solid gem I have ever seen, because of the solid team and founder Sunny.
I'll keep supporting this project lifetime. No doubt!
Maybe we are on a journey for 35…
Brief update
Team decided to burn the lp in order to ensure the safety of the liquidity
https://suiscan.xyz/mainnet/tx/Br9qCLHiMt6hTUMPhSsSaECKZHKbb1Tgp3pdiox4ukxe
They also decided to increase the lp to help whales join it and minimise the dumps
https://suivision.xyz/txblock/FyYQziczrmhLwJMmWt9wb6ruYWQcFFH9P7As9sxPdHha
Why did the WALE token move to the Sui chain?
Because it heard Sui was making waves — and wha…
Buying a fat bag at this SUI launch - $WALE
https://dexscreener.com/sui/0x6923952b667c4c9364ecbdc5fe59dc55e645eb5f654f215745ff9da548dd5cff
The ultimate SUI mascot here!!! I'm buying a fat bag here, because I know the team's past experiences very well. SUI chain is hyped like crazy. It's going to be the next Solana very soon. So we should grab the early bags on such good team projects here. Always DYOR, NFA. I'm ris…
Aped here $FRIED (SOL) Deep fried memes looking good getting bags here pumping well from dips
https://x.com/i/communities/1919234462874767692
https://dexscreener.com/solana/HheMTs1xEyeD514q4bDb2rKQiynC2qHBYWkA1qRFkj8K
BpRMSjbQqm26f51HYKeBLfKEs43yXUhaKA8DXvCxpump
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @reachergemcall. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,187,938 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@reachergemcall named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@gumbycoineth named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Reacher Gem Calls🚀💎” (@reachergemcall), 68 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/reachergemcall.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.