Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ReCosm | Перепродажа косметики

Channel

ReCosm | Перепродажа косметики

@re_cosm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

800subscribers

+145 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004226819060
TypeChannel
Username@re_cosm
CreatedBetween 1 May 2026 and 23 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/re_cosm

Growth

6548007277 August 2026 — 655 subscribers7 August 2026 — 654 subscribers15 August 2026 — 742 subscribers21 August 2026 — 750 subscribers27 August 2026 — 800 subscribers7 August 202627 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 20 days, net +145. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 632–822 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 20:13800+50
21 Aug 2026, 20:56750+8
15 Aug 2026, 10:18742+88
7 Aug 2026, 23:58654-1
7 Aug 2026, 10:47655first reading

Engagement

3 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.8%
avg views ÷ 800 subscribers
Avg views / post
278
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 3 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held3 (23 July 202631 July 2026)
Views total556
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 12:18 UTC283 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🩷Интенсивная омолаживающая ампула с микроиглами medicube 7500 - 1650 руб. 🩷Омолаживающая ампула с микроиглами medicube 2000 - 1450 руб. ❤️Сыворотка для упругости кожи medicube EGF NAD - 1500 руб. 💜Бустер-сыворотка с ретинолом и пептидами medicube - 1500 руб. 💚Омолаживающая ампула с ПДРН и коллагеном REJURAN - 1950 руб. 💚Обновляющий бустер-крем с ретиналем Celimax - 790 руб. ❤️Антивозрастной восстанавливающий крем Mad

31 Jul 2026, 12:18 UTC273 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤎Интенсивная ампула с пробиотиками SKIN1004 - 1450 руб. 🤍Ампула-бустер с ретинолом SKIN1004 - 1350 руб. ❤️Осветляющие пэды Anua с 5% ниацинамидом и транексамовой кислотой - 1490 руб. 💚Пэды с азелаиновой кислотой Anua - 1550 руб. 🩵Увлажняющие пэды с ПДРН и гиалуроновой кислотой Anua - 1600 руб. 💛Сыворотка от пигментации Manyo - 1490 руб. 🩷Гелевые тонер-пэды с ПДРН и коллагеном medicube - 1490 руб. 🩷Набор тканевых масо

23 Jul 2026, 07:09 UTC735 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤍Восстанавливающая ампула с лизатом бифидобактерий Manyo, 30мл - 1400 руб. 🧡Антивозрастная ампула с ПДРН и ретинолом Dr.Ceuracle - 1190 руб. 💛Ампула на основе центеллы азиатской SKIN1004 - 1650 руб. 💚Сыворотка с азелаиновой кислотой Anua Azelaic Acid 10 - 1390 руб. ❤️Осветляющая сыворотка с 10% ниацинамидом и транексамовой кислотой Anua - 1350 руб. 🔥Сет Manyo - 1990 руб.: 🧡Гидрофильное масло Manyo, 200мл (срок 03.12

Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @re_cosm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 360,030 of 1,623,166entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ReCosm | Перепродажа косметики” (@re_cosm), 800 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/re_cosm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.