#互联网观察 ▎Cloudflare 推出 Kitesurf:一款专门为 AI Agent 打造的云端浏览器 Cloudflare 推出了新的浏览器项目 Kitesurf,定位为 “the browser for the Agentic Cloud”。 Kitesurf 是一款无状态、可大规模扩展的 Web 浏览器,整个浏览器直接运行在 Cloudflare Workers 之上,主要面向 AI Agent、自动化程序等场景。 和传统浏览器自动化方案相比,Kitesurf 的思路是把浏览器直接变成云端基础设施。AI Agent 可以通过 Chrome DevTools Protocol(CDP)控制 Kitesurf,因此原本能够操作 Chrome 的 Agent,理论上也可以直接接入 Kitesurf。 Cloudflare 目前提供了公开 Playground,可以直接输入网站地址,并执行页面检查、截图、生成 PD…

Channel
kaze channel
@rclogs
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
84subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002141743879 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rclogs |
| Description | 记录一些值得被记录的事情 频道地址:https://t.me/rclogs 频道网站:https://channel.rclogs.com 联系方式:https://t.me/kazepm_bot |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rclogs |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 84 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:42 | 84 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 49.4%
- avg views ÷ 84 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 41.5
- 13 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 3.28%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 13
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (29 June 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 539 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 17:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 273
- Videos
- 11
- Links
- 341
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 50.0% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
sub2api 曝 OAuth 高危漏洞,仅凭邮箱即可接管账户 sub2api v0.1.171 及之前版本存在一个 CVSS 8.8 的高危 OAuth 账户接管漏洞。攻击者仅需知道受害者注册邮箱,无需密码或验证码、无需用户交互,即可通过接口将自己的 OAuth 身份绑定到受害者账户,完全控制其 API 密钥、账单余额与订阅配额。 攻击者利用 pending session 流程中 existingUser 分支不校验密码和验证码的缺陷,将目标用户 ID 设为受害者后完成 OAuth 身份绑定。此后攻击者每次 OAuth 登录均会解析为受害者账户。 Github Issues 🌸 在花频道 · 茶馆水群 · 投稿通道
❤1
有点意思 https://priceai.cc/
Cloudflare Wallet 现在可以抢注ID https://blog.cloudflare.com/wallets/
Windows任务管理器开发者 Dave Plummer,开发了一款macOS的任务管理器,目前可免费下载使用 https://tmog.org/
声明:本人从未在互联网上诋毁过深度求索,并没有称梁文锋为梁白开。 本人实际上是深度求索一年半年老粉,经过长时间的思考,我发现DeepSeek才是中国AI的希望,有时候做出决定很难,经过许多个日夜的思考,我决定加入DeepSeek粉丝团。 至于Kimi,GLM和Minimax,祝他们的开源模型一切顺利。 本人从未诋毁过深度求索,也从未称呼梁总为牢梁,望周知🥹
😁1
梁圣😭
internshala.com,注册选大学生毕业年份选 26 年以后,其他随便填,可以领一年 google ai plus
https://linux.do/t/topic/2643862
https://vibe-hub.org/ 产品经理速成指南
https://phistory.cc/ 这个网站可以查看主流 AI Coding 工具如 claude code,codex 的系统提示词,以及更新了什么。
这是 ChatGPT App 被并入 Codex App (0.125.0) & 发布 GPT-5.6 时的系统 prompt 对比,几乎是重写了一份 https://phistory.cc/?agent=codex&from=0.125.0&to=0.144.6
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @rclogs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“kaze channel” (@rclogs), 84 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rclogs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.