Channel
@rbbadvert
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
129subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002431683063 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rbbadvert |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rbbadvert |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:42 | 129 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 127 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:01 | 127 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 27 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 4 (27 April 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,470 |
| Reactions total | 30 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 02:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
34 reactions across 2 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 10 | 29.4% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 23.5% | |
| 👌 | 5 | 14.7% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 11.8% | |
| 🏆 | 3 | 8.82% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 5.88% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 5.88% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 27 April 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇹🇼 小蘭・九年老字號頂級外約茶坊 🇹🇼 台灣高端外送｜嚴選本地高顏值優質女孩 清純、火辣、氣質款，總有一味合你胃口 TW本土高顏值神級女孩，每一場都對得起身分 無論你是來台灣商務出差，還是觀光旅遊 在台灣小蘭都能為你安排一場值得的夜晚 ✅ 本人實拍・0修圖騙照｜價位透明・誠實不話術 ✅ 全程保密・安全無虞｜不預付・見面現金交易 能在台灣這行站穩九年，靠的就是真功夫與誠信 🕐 營業時間：中午13:00－凌晨04:00 隨時為你服務 來台灣小蘭讓你喝茶不踩雷！👇 ✈️TG聯絡我 @yd52013 LINE：twcc356 𝑮𝒍𝒆𝒆𝒛𝒚: yd888 ✈️每日看妹班表：https://t.me/+wzbskzDgOABjOTZl 複製鏈接去谷歌網站： https://mylink.tw/xiaolan52013
👍9🔥7👌5🏆3❤🔥2💯2🥰2
#分享一下在日本最近一次還不錯的體驗 先說背景，本人快四十了，平時工作忙、花錢最怕踩雷。現在網路上真真假假，很多店家宣傳得天花亂墜，實際去體驗完全不是那麼回事，之前真的踩過不少坑 前陣子朋友推薦這家，一開始也沒抱太大期待，不過這家的店長小姐姐滿特別的，沒一上來就推最貴的方案，而是先問我預算、在意的點，再推薦適合的，溝通起來很舒服，流程費用也提前講得清清楚楚 重點來了，這次Angel推薦了優奈妹妹，真的讓我體驗到什麼叫「櫻花妹的香」一進門，妹妹臉上就一直掛著笑容，笑起來很可愛，小小一隻、整體身材跟外型超棒！洗殘廢澡時，妹妹溫柔到不行，加上不經意的身體接觸，我身下小弟早就硬到不行...🤤 出浴室到了床上，妹妹一下就交疊上來開始跟我喇舌，全身慾望直接被燒起來！那柔軟的C杯在身前磨擦，下半身也交疊素股，喇了好長一陣子後，妹妹開始一路往下親，直到含住小弟弟開始口，從輕舔到加重、慢慢吞吐，真的很會！後來換成69姿勢，手捏著妹妹超有彈…
💯2👍1🔥1
🇯🇵答案在路上 自由在風里🇯🇵 -日本東京大阪旅遊出差必備- 專屬你的性福指南-千夏の伊甸園 精選不同風格的日本佳人 只為旅途疲憊的你 帶來一絲日系溫暖 ✔️ 酒店上門・輕鬆享受 ✔️ 外國人也能簡單預約 ✔️ 安心溝通・快速安排 你的日本性福顧問千夏： Telegram：@q093028 Gleezy：t594570 Line：m51828 一鍵加入：https://t.me/addlist/rwIXnZWWWUM5MzZl #日本
🇹🇼 台灣絕色戀人外約 ✨ 不是隨便配對 是為你挑一位 真的合得來的她 ✨每一位小姐都經過細選 外型、氣質、互動感 只推薦「會讓人想再約一次」的對象 💗 想要溫柔陪伴 💗 想要心跳加速 💗 想找懂聊天、懂分寸的戀人感 我們幫你配到對的人 你只要好好享受當下 📌 生客送2000優惠 📌 首次諮詢更彈性 📌 配對成功率加碼 📌 私訊即可低調了解（不囉嗦、不推銷） 有些夜晚，不該一個人過 絕色戀人，為你安排剛剛好的相遇絕色戀人 —————————————— 💬 Gleezy：nnaa520 💬 telegram： @nnaa520 ❤️ 選妹加入：https://t.me/+p1s9QLWe4ZFjMTg1 #台灣
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @rbbadvert. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 636,714 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RBB客戶廣告信息(詳情自行查詢）” (@rbbadvert), 129 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rbbadvert.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.