Channel
@razorill
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
341subscribers
+33 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003258800044 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @razorill |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/razorill |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 20:29 | 341 | +15 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:36 | 326 | +14 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:02 | 312 | +4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:48 | 308 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 308 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (26 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,747 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 07:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Заметил, что многие невысокие парни пытаются казаться выше, но при этом носят вещи которые визуально делают их ниже. О черт парень, твой рост составляет 5 футов и ты носишь эти мешковатые вещи на себе? Хочу дать действительно рабочих советов, чтобы ваш рост казался выше чем он есть на самом деле, интересно?
Photo, posted without a caption
Немного мыслей Измена в отношениях действительно ли это так плохо? Моя личная позиция насчет этого проста - нет, не плохо. Раньше я боялся что мне изменят и в связи с этим у меня не строились отношения, так как я был ебливым параноиком и просто заканчивал отношения в связи со страхом измены, я всегда боялся, что партнер изменит мне и пытался подстраиваться под партнера всё время, переступал через себя и в целом делал…
Так как же убрать эти отеки без гайдов с тт о воде и тд? отеки — это защитный механизм организма, который использует воду для разбавления и удержания токсинов, предотвращая повреждение тканей. лимфатическая система сбрасывает отходы под кожу, а детоксикация активируется при застое лимфы. Какие действительно продукты употреблять при отеках и как они помогут? собрал РЕАЛЬНО рабочие продукты 1. Свежевыжатый сок из очи…
60% голосов за отеки. ребят, искренне жаль, что вы отекаете и это приносит вам дискомфорт. скоро займусь отдельным постом про это без упоминания праймал диеты) P.S может совсем чуть-чуть упомяну 😅
ааджонус не рекомендовал употреблять холодное мясо, но сейчас 4 утра и умру от голода если буду ждать пока мясо достигнет комнатной температуры) но я откладываю кусочки жира с мяса в сторону не из-за этого. холодный жир очень сложно жевать.
ыыы блять а почему сырая продукция лечит, но ее не практикуют и бояться? ————————————————— все просто. рабам не положено знать правду. ты реально думаешь, что живешь в мире, где о твоем здоровье кто-то заботится? на твоем здоровье нельзя заработать. фармацевтическим гоям не нужен здоровый человек. им нужен хроник - живой труп, который медленно гниёт и платит за жизнь скупая таблетки. сырое мясо даёт абсолютный иммун…
очередная жертва промышленного бреда. вы реально верите сказкам из школьных учебников, написанных рабами фарминдустрии? если бы сырое мясо убивало, человечество вымерло бы ещё в пещерах. суть в том, что наши предки умирали не от сыроедения. они гибли от травм на охоте, инфекций, холода и банального отсутствия гигиены. короткая средняя продолжительность жизни - это результат дикой детской смертности. те, кто выживал …
охота разъебать тупой биомусор который вам пудрит мозг в тик токе, нет, ну действительно, я посмотрел пару таких видео и меня просто пробивает на смех. (говорю про отеки сейчас) парень, какая к черту вода? как вода из крана поможет тебе убрать твои отеки? закрой свой рот пожалуйста и не заставляй верить в твой бред.
Video, posted without a caption
в скором времени я закрою этот канал и он будет приватным. здесь будут только рабочие способы, не с тт, а действительно годные мысли
.
The shares total 148%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @razorill. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
.
The shares total 148%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 599,321 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Je n’en vois pas l’utilité” (@razorill), 341 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/razorill.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.