Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for RazGrom Tg

Channel

RazGrom Tg

@razgromomentum

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

226subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002403692160
TypeChannel
Username@razgromomentum
DescriptionМотивация, юмор и ирония жизни от спортсменки, мамы и организатора спортивных событий.
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/razgromomentum

Growth

2266 Aug 2026, 23:17 — 226 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 03:02 — 226 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 23:177 Aug 2026, 03:02
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 225–227 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 03:02226no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:17226first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 11 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
44.3%
avg views ÷ 226 subscribers
Avg views / post
100
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held13 (11 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,001
Reactions total50
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 03:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
761
Videos
271
Links
217

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

59 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1932.2%
1728.8%
🙏1016.9%
🔥915.3%
🤣35.08%
🥰11.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 13:44 UTC32 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Doc_Joint

Тут РБК Стиль статью написал с мои соучастием. 🫳🫳 https://style.rbc.ru/health/6a71e7209a79475d5b4b75d5

4👍1

3 Aug 2026, 16:57 UTC76 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Чувствую, что вы приуныли. Кто-то даже отписался, когда тема пошла о раке. Мы все равно рано или поздно умрем. Помирать так с юмором. Какая картинка вас заставила улыбнуться?

🔥6🤣3

2 Aug 2026, 11:29 UTC81 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мифы о раке, в которые до сих пор верят. 1. «Рак — это приговор» Нет. Многие виды рака успешно лечатся, особенно при раннем обнаружении. 2. «Если ничего не болит — всё в порядке» К сожалению, рак часто развивается без симптомов. Поэтому скрининги придумали не от скуки. 3. «Сахар кормит рак — уберу сладкое и всё пройдет» Рак «ест» не только сахар, а вообще всё, что даёт энергию. Отказ от сладкого полезен, но это не

9🙏1

29 Jul 2026, 07:24 UTC95 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Чужой среди своих. Я — тело. Я привык работать по расписанию: клетки делятся, растут, выполняют свои обязанности — одни строят кожу, другие переваривают пищу, третьи защищают от микробов. Мы — как маленький город, где у каждого своя роль и своя очередь. Однажды одна из моих клеток сломала правило. Представь рабочего, который должен печь хлеб, но вдруг решает печь всё подряд и бесконечно вызывает подмогу. Сначала эт

👍4

28 Jul 2026, 12:32 UTC102 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Рак - тема грустная. Голосование выше показало, что большинству активных подписчиков к сожалению тема близка. Придерживаюсь мнения, что смерть - неотъемлемая часть жизни. И если мы не сможем победить рак на поздней стадии, то узнать о нем на ранних и принять меры, вполне в наших силах! Мне было 15 когда у мамы отняли грудь из-за рака молочной железы, и 16 когда она умерла от рака мозга. Её маме (моей бабушке) в ию

🙏9

22 Jul 2026, 20:33 UTC143 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Вы или ваши родственники сталкивались с раком?

  1. Да91%
  2. Нет9%
  3. Мой рак ещё меня найдет.0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Jul 2026, 09:12 UTC156 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Пора расхламляться! Представьте что налетел смерч навоза и испачкал все ваши вещи. Какие из них реально хочется спасти и отмыть? Остальные будьте добры выбросить или раздать нуждающимся. И ещё одна интересная мотивация для любителей статистики в конце видео. А у вас какие правила покупки и хранения новых вещей? Делитесь в комментариях!)

👍5

19 Jul 2026, 15:23 UTC124 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

А вы знали что Я ТЕБЯ ЛЮБЛЮ это аббревиатура?)

👍2🥰1

19 Jul 2026, 08:17 UTC81 viewsread 7 August 2026

Победила тягу к сладкому, увеличив количество белка в пище. Теперь тазик салата с зеленью и семенами вместо тортика, зефира,печеньки и конфетки с чаем. Спасибо каналу Кати. Дозированная научная информация с доказательной базой про наше тело от биолога, который многое тестирует на себе. Ниже речь пойдет про белок.

19 Jul 2026, 08:17 UTC111 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вам в помощь сделала резюме всей практической инфо по белку. Сохраняйте в шпаргалку 👇 ✅ Количество Ориентиры: минимум — 0,8 г/кг веса; базовый уровень — около 1 г/кг; оптимум для многих — 1,2–1,6 г/кг; при активных тренировках и наборе мышц — до 2 г/кг; больше 2 г/кг не нужно ✅ Время Оптимально съедать 25–35 г белка за один прием пищи. Обычно это 2–3 приема пищи с белком. Если работаете над мышечной массой — 4-5 пр

👍5

15 Jul 2026, 18:49 UTC108 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @runforhealthPhoto

Обувь с около нулевым перепадом (зеро-дроп) улучшает экономичность бега Перепад высоты от пятки к носку кроссовка — одна из тех характеристик беговой обуви, о которых постоянно спорят. Но в реальных моделях дроп трудно изучать отдельно от всех остальных «наворотов»: современных пен, пластин и других технологий. Поэтому в новом исследовании сделали довольно удачный ход: ученые специально проверили, как именно перепа

👍2🔥2

15 Jul 2026, 09:44 UTC98 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @biohacking_upgradePhoto

Митохондрии — гораздо больше, чем мы привыкли о них думать 🫥 Попалась интересная работа. Авторы представляют митохондрии как информационный хаб клетки — своеобразный клеточный процессор. Работает эта система в три этапа 🫥 🔽ВХОД: сначала митохондрии считывают поступающие сигналы. Они оценивают доступность кислорода и питательных веществ, уровень АТФ, соотношение NAD⁺/NADH и другие параметры. Также митохондрии чувст

🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @razgromomentum. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Jul 2026, 20:33 UTCAnonymous Poll23 voters

Вы или ваши родственники сталкивались с раком?

  1. Да91%
  2. Нет9%
  3. Мой рак ещё меня найдет.0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 918,445 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“RazGrom Tg” (@razgromomentum), 226 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/razgromomentum.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.