Channel
@razborysti
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
47subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001977501700 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @razborysti |
| Description | • делаю разборы на стили, пишу свое мнение о каналах • необычный пиар • личное мнение, без оскорблений • главный админ @something_good_of • админ по вопросам @Lavasssh |
| Created | 29 June 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/razborysti |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 47 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:58 | 47 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 1 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
45 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 17 | 37.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 17 | 37.8% | |
| 🍓 | 3 | 6.67% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 6.67% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 4.44% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 2.22% | |
| 👾 | 1 | 2.22% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 2.22% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 1 December 2024 to 9 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Посколько никто не отозвался, могу добросовестно пропиарить СЕБЯ! https://t.me/spirit_art_chronoiki На моем канале вышел фанарт по mouthwashing с Аней, так что рекомендую заглянуть) Буду рада вашим комментариям и если вы распространите мой арт
👍2⚡1❤🔥1👾1💔1
И никого нет
Пока ожидаем, буду рада активу на личном канале админа(ссылка указана в посте) 😉
🔥2❤🔥1
🥀ЕЖЕНЕДЕЛЬНЫЙ РАЗБОР СТИЛЕЙ ОТ СПИРИТ🥀 на этой неделе 3 места Правила : • делаем репост этого поста (по желанию подписка на этот Тгк: https://t.me/spirit_art_chronoiki ) • подписка на этот акк обязательна • кидаем свой акк в комменты. Я распишу что по моему мнению создает ваш стиль, сделаю коммент на тему вашего аккаунта (что есть и в каком количестве) • участники активят на аккаунтах друг друга • участие допу…
🍓3❤1❤🔥1
!ЕЖЕНЕДЕЛЬНЫЙ РАЗБОР ОФИЦИАЛЬНО ОКОНЧЕН! • На этой неделе было занято: 8/10 • Разобрано: 8/10 Можете поделиться своими впечатлениями в комментариях ;) Знаете, иногда было бы интересно послушать и про мой стиль, как админа. Но увы, придется гадать, ахаха
❤🔥5❤1
👻ЕЖЕНЕДЕЛЬНЫЕ РАЗБОРЫ СТИЛЕЙ ОТ СПИРИТ👻 Часть 8 https://t.me/boofnoom Все работы одновременно такие похожие и такие разные. Мне было очень сложно сформулировать мнение, но вот оно! Лайн, как по мне тут играет ключевую роль лайн и цвет. Анатомически тела приближены к каноничным, реалистичным, я бы сказал. А вот лица имеют свою изюминку именно от автора, мне не с чем это сравнить. Лично меня в работах цепляют глаза …
❤6❤🔥1
👻ЕЖЕНЕДЕЛЬНЫЕ РАЗБОРЫ СТИЛЕЙ ОТ СПИРИТ👻 Часть 7 @kaederaya15 Автор, сознайся, ты любитель западных комиксов или манги? Посколько твой стиль мне напоминает оба одновременно! Удивительно! Динамика, палитра, игра с формой и светом - это все о тебе. Каждая деталь дополняет другую и все это превращается в гармонию К сожалению, я не знаю как оценивать вязание и шитье, поэтому эти фото не приложены, но знайте, автор еще…
❤4❤🔥2
👻ЕЖЕНЕДЕЛЬНЫЕ РАЗБОРЫ СТИЛЕЙ ОТ СПИРИТ👻 Часть 6 @domstasyana Да вы любители впечатлять! Форма, цвет, детали. Выделить что из этого сильнее бросается в глаза сложно, однако, я постараюсь. По моему скромному мнению тут наибольшую роль играют детали, а после них цвет и лишь потом форма. Посколько автор умело играет с визуальной нагрузкой и заставляет часами рассматривать его работы
❤3❤🔥1🔥1
👻ЕЖЕНЕДЕЛЬНЫЕ РАЗБОРЫ СТИЛЕЙ ОТ СПИРИТ👻 Часть 5 @sonevnas Уникальный, я бы сказал минималистичный стиль с достаточно ярко выраженными чертами. Особенно в глаза бросаются лица, ведь тело более приближено к реальному. Также, автор мастер цвета, если судить по данным работам И любитель сложных поз (дай Бог всем так)
❤🔥5❤2
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @razborysti. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 592,417 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@razborysti named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🥀 разборы стилей от спирит 🥀” (@razborysti), 47 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/razborysti.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.