Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for РАЗБОРКИ

Channel

РАЗБОРКИ

@razborki_v_pitere

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

572subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002120425768
TypeChannel
Username@razborki_v_pitere
Descriptionудалим канал, когда во всём разберемся
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/razborki_v_pitere

Growth

5727 Aug 2026, 17:54 — 572 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 03:31 — 572 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 17:548 Aug 2026, 03:31
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 571–573 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 03:31572no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:54572first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 28 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
69
Videos
67
Links
36

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1h 09m
Average length
13m 56s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

99 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53844559303960382203434.3%
custom 52922306645847087423030.3%
custom 53146600017116733481313.1%
custom 520172941153090452399.09%
custom 525127524372449068355.05%
custom 534849837399961693433.03%
custom 537763915587231603533.03%
custom 545644178559520633022.02%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 99reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 1 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Jul 2026, 17:49 UTC813 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

КАК НАЧАТЬ РАБОТАТЬ НА СВАДЬБАХ ЗАРУБЕЖОМ. Чем отличается Грузия от Италии. Почему вам стоит делать загранпаспорт уже сейчас. Основатель свадебного агентства NOW FAMILY - Вероника Кароль. Наш Instagram: soyuz_dvoih Агентство Вероники Кароль: now_family_ 00:27 работа зарубежом 08:40 зачем работать заграницей 12:00 плюсы 15:00 стресс 18:20 отметить свадьбу в Италии стоит как в России 22:00 выгода для фото/видео к

custom 52922306645847087427custom 53776391558723160353

Signed СОЮЗ двоих

1 Jul 2026, 14:19 UTC442 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Сегодня дроп подкаста, от которого у меня было самое большое количество инсайтов. В 21:00.

custom 52922306645847087426custom 53146600017116733483custom 54564417855952063302

Signed СОЮЗ двоих

1 Jun 2026, 16:25 UTC699 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Видео с РАЗБОРОК от Георгия Гребенщикова. Приятного просмотра 🤌 https://www.instagram.com/reel/DZDLaPutD3y/

custom 53844559303960382204custom 52922306645847087422

Signed СОЮЗ двоих

30 May 2026, 08:32 UTC562 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Угадайте про кого?

custom 53844559303960382205

Signed СОЮЗ двоих

29 May 2026, 21:02 UTC438 viewsread 8 August 2026

Возможно теперь РАЗБОРКИ видеографов и рилсмейкеров будут всегда совместные. Норм?

Signed СОЮЗ двоих

29 May 2026, 21:01 UTC409 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 52017294115309045235

Signed СОЮЗ двоих

29 May 2026, 21:00 UTC370 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @zdrasteyanastiaa

Пытались «разобраться», но так и не «разобрались» или Почему рилсмейкерам на самом деле живётся сложнее? Сегодня была на «Разборках» у Эда. И для начала - респект за формат! Видеографы обычно живут либо на съёмках, либо в монтажке, и мы редко пересекаемся офлайн. А такие встречи - это возможность выйти из своего пузыря: посмотреть работы, услышать иное мнение, пообщаться, пообниматься. И съесть отличный бургер ко

custom 53844559303960382209custom 52017294115309045234custom 53484983739996169343

Signed СОЮЗ двоих

29 May 2026, 20:58 UTC301 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 53844559303960382202

Signed СОЮЗ двоих

29 May 2026, 20:10 UTC331 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Фотографии от Кости Сурикова готовы! Наслаждаемся эстетикой early 2000s indie. https://surikovnasvadbe.ru/razborki

custom 53844559303960382208custom 52922306645847087424

Signed СОЮЗ двоих

29 May 2026, 15:38 UTC≈1,090 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Сколько вчера было обсуждений про контент! 🤌

custom 52512752437244906834

Signed СОЮЗ двоих

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @razborki_v_pitere. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 486,902 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“РАЗБОРКИ” (@razborki_v_pitere), 572 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/razborki_v_pitere.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.