делать 2 раза в неделю созвоны с вами? будет бесплатный рейт и бесплатные советы для улучшения внешности 🤩
❤12

Channel
@raydenbetter
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
337subscribers
+90 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003758388905 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @raydenbetter |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 7 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/raydenbetter |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Oct 2026, 20:16 | 337 | -15 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 16:36 | 352 | -13 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:59 | 365 | +20 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 08:39 | 345 | +10 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 01:22 | 335 | no change |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:27 | 335 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:42 | 334 | +64 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 12:06 | 270 | +23 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 247 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 7 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
198 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 101 | 51.0% | |
| 🔥 | 55 | 27.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 33 | 16.7% | |
| 😎 | 9 | 4.55% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 198 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2026 to 4 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
делать 2 раза в неделю созвоны с вами? будет бесплатный рейт и бесплатные советы для улучшения внешности 🤩
❤12
ТЫ ВСЕ ЕЩЕ ДУМАЕШЬ ЧТО ВНЕШНОСТЬ НЕ ВАЖНА? Раньше я думал, что тема внешности сильно переоценена. Что главное — характер, интеллект, навыки, а все остальное вторично. Но после появления луксмаксинга, я очень сильно вовлекся в эту тему. Начал изучать все больше исследований про внешность на социальном и нейробиологическом уровне. И чем дальше я заходил - тем больше понимал: внешность действительно играет огромную рол…
🔥6❤4❤🔥3
👀ТРАНСФОРМАЦИЯ МОЕГО УЧЕНИКА ВСЕГО ЗА 60 ДНЕЙ👑 📉ДО ПРОТОКОЛА НА ВНЕШНОСТЬ: Профиль лица: Слабая нижняя челюсть, короткая линия которая портила профиль. Анфас лица: Асимметрия лица и неподходящая прическа которая не подчеркивала его черты Зона глаз: Асимметрия бровей, отрицательный кантальный наклон. 📈После трансформации: Профиль лица: Вытянулась нижняя челюсть, линия стала четкой и выраженной. Верхняя челюсть т…
❤8😎4🔥3
Как вы смотрите на то, чтобы создать некую базу с абонементом (неделя/месяц/3 месяца/год) где будет вся информация по луксмаксингу, гайды на все зоны лица (упражнения) соц.навыкам, телу и т.д.? цены будут максимально приятными)
❤13❤🔥6🔥5
Если наберете много реакций, то выложу вторую часть в которой расскажу про биохакинг гр, а также лучшие секретные методы для увеличения его выработки🤫
❤19🔥8❤🔥7
ГАЙД НА ГОРМОН РОСТА Ч1
❤9🔥4❤🔥3😎2
Делаю пост на тему: «как максимально забустить свой гормон роста»?
❤21🔥14❤🔥8
ГАЙД НА КОЖУ
🔥7❤5❤🔥3
Какой тип кожи разбираем?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Про что делать следующий пост?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🙂Ты молодец! 👍Нет, правда молодец, проебывать лучшие годы своей жизни на дешевый дофамин не каждый умеет. зачем гнаться за успехом, если он сам придет, потому что ты репостишь роскошную и успешную жизнь, думая что в тебе есть уникальность и ты не такой как все…🆓 🌐А теперь серьезно. За последние 5 лет луксмаксинг разорвал все соц.сети и вышел за рамки интернета. Миллионы подростков и даже взрослых людей начали уха…
❤4❤🔥3🔥3
✨НЕВЕРОЯТНАЯ ТРАНСФОРМАЦИЯ МОЕГО УЧЕНИКА ВСЕГО ЗА 30 ДНЕЙ!!🥇 😶🌫️ Что мы видим до гайда? 👉 Опухшее и залитое лицо, создается ощущение усталости и вялости 👉 Мягкие черты лица, неуверенность и отсутствие харизмы 👉 Лицевые кости были невыразительными, максилла была впалая, а линия челюсти отсутствовала… 🔝 ЧТО МЫ ВИДИМ ПОСЛЕ ГАЙДА? 👉 Мы полностью избавились от отеков и лишней воды в лице 👉 Заострили черты ли…
❤6🔥5😎3
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @raydenbetter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какой тип кожи разбираем?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Про что делать следующий пост?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2026 to 4 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“райден” (@raydenbetter), 337 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/raydenbetter.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.