Video, posted without a caption
❤5
Signed 竜 Blaydrax

Channel
@raxeclipse
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
46subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 9 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002311225536 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @raxeclipse |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/raxeclipse |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 17:40 | 46 | -1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:23 | 47 | no change |
| 9 Sept 2026, 23:47 | 47 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (4 August 2026 – 6 September 2026) |
| Views total | 512 |
| Reactions total | 16 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Sept 2026, 17:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
51 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 31 | 60.8% | |
| 🍓 | 10 | 19.6% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 11.8% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 7.84% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @raxeclipse. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 6 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Video, posted without a caption
❤5
Signed 竜 Blaydrax
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed 竜 Blaydrax
واقعا قلمم ضعیف تر شده 😭 احتمالا تا مدتی فعلا ننویسم و با یه اثر طولانی برگردم ( شاید یه کتاب جدید؟ )
Signed 竜 Blaydrax
نمیدانم نخستین انسانی که عشق را به زبان آورد، چه چیزی دیده بود. شاید چشمانی را؛ شاید دستی را که برای نخستین بار از میان هزاران دست، در میان شلوغی جهان، برای او معنایی دیگر پیدا کرده بود. شاید هم هیچکدام. شاید تنها دریافته بود که در این جهان، بعضی از آدمیان را نمیتوان همچون دیگران از کنار خود عبور داد. و همین، مرا به پرسشی قدیمیتر از خودِ این واژه میرساند: آیا ما آدمیان کسی را دوست میداریم، یا نخست در او چیز…
Signed 竜 Blaydrax
و حتی خودت، دیگر همان آدم سابق نیستی. پس اگر روزی آن مخلوق از جهان تو بیرون برود، تنها یک نفر را از دست ندادهای. جهانی را از دست دادهای که فقط با حضور او وجود داشت. و شاید دردِ حقیقی نیز همین باشد. نه نبودنِ یک نفر؛ بلکه بازگشتِ جهان به شکل سابقش. قلم باز هم مکث کرد. این بار فهمیدم چرا از نوشتن میترسد. چون هرچه بیشتر از او مینویسم، بیشتر درمییابم که هیچ کلمهای به اندازهی کافی بزرگ نیست. برای بعضی مخلوق…
❤3
Signed 竜 Blaydrax
اگر زیبایی را تنها در چیزی میدیدم که چشم میتواند ببیند، شاید تو نیز برایم فقط یکی از زیباترین آدمهای جهان بودی. اما بعضی آدمها از جایی فراتر از نگاه آغاز میشوند. در طرز حرفزدنشان، در سکوتهایشان، در آن لحظهای که نامت را صدا میزنند، و حتی در سادهترین جملههایی که میگویند، چیزی هست که نمیتوان با چشم توضیحش داد. تو از همانهایی. مخلوقی که زیباییاش به چهرهاش ختم نمیشود؛ چون هرچه بیشتر شناخته میشود، بیش…
❤6
Signed 竜 Blaydrax
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed 竜 Blaydrax
البته چندروز پیس این رو اماده کرده بودم صرفا منتظر بودم بعد کنکور قرارش بدم
Signed 竜 Blaydrax
بعد از مدت ها نوشتم بلاخره
❤1
Signed 竜 Blaydrax
آری، درست است. در حال حمل واگنی از اصحاب هستند. پس چه کسی در آن بند است که ابرها نیز اینگونه برایش میگریند؟ آیا من نیز باید ابرها را همراهی کنم؟ ناگاه صدایی برمیخیزد. چند لحظه را از دست دادهام؟ بوی خون را بهخوبی استشمام میکنم. سرهای اسبان، جسدهای سربازان و تکهپارههایی از لباس اصحاب را میتوان یافت. آری، گویا حملهای صورت گرفته تا آنان را به چنگ آورند. اما آن دختر فرار کرده است؛ پس به دنبال چه هستند؟ ناگاه…
❤1
Signed 竜 Blaydrax
دوست میدارم در واپسین ثانیههایی که ما را به یکدیگر محرم کردهاند، خواستار بوسهای باشم؛ نه بر آن گونههای سرخ و قربانیطلبت، بلکه بر آن چشمانی که از دلِ یک رؤیا آوردهای؛ گویی رؤیایی از درگیریهای افسانگان بوده و تو نیز یکی از اسیرانش بودهای. اسیرانی که چنان چشم بر مالهای خدایان دارند که کافی است لحظهای از آنان غفلت کنی تا ببینی چگونه خود را با آن الماسهای تیره پوشاندهاند و در حال فرارند. آری، دردانهی من، ت…
Signed 竜 Blaydrax
دیسلایک چرااا 😭
🍓4
Signed 竜 Blaydrax
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @raxeclipse. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کسوف” (@raxeclipse), 46 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/raxeclipse.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.