Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Raw Primal Diet / Primal Healing

@rawprimaldiet

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,685subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001624880733
TypeChannel
Username@rawprimaldiet
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/rawprimaldiet

Growth

1,6851,6871,6867 August 2026 — 1,685 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,685 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,687 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,685 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,685–1,687 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 09:561,685-2
10 Aug 2026, 17:041,687+2
7 Aug 2026, 16:181,685no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:391,685first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 6 January 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 09s
Average length
2m 23s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

245 reactions across 9 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8635.1%
🔥7129.0%
👍6024.5%
🤔218.57%
🤯20.816%
👌10.408%
👏10.408%
😢10.408%
🙏10.408%
🤩10.408%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 245reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 6 January 2025 to 16 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Mar 2025, 21:38 UTC≈6,470 views56 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

René Quinton (1866–1925), a French physiologist who conducted experiments with seawater (saltwater) injections on dogs. René Quinton’s Saltwater Experiments (1897-1904) - Quinton believed that seawater closely resembled human blood plasma. - To test this, he bled dogs to the point of near death and then replaced their blood with a saline solution made from seawater. - The dogs survived and recovered, leading him to

🔥25🤔1210👍9

26 Jan 2025, 01:06 UTC≈4,770 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Hormonal Contraceptives Increase Breast Cancer Risk A 2017 Danish study published in The New England Journal of Medicine examined hormonal contraceptive use in 1.8 million women aged 15-49 over 10.9 years. - Overall Risk: Women currently or recently using hormonal contraceptives had a 20% higher risk of breast cancer compared to non-users. - Duration Matters: Risk increased with prolonged use, with women using cont

🔥98👍5😢1

21 Jan 2025, 23:31 UTC≈3,750 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤔8🔥53👌1

20 Jan 2025, 18:11 UTC≈3,500 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ElevateThyMindVideo

Speaking of frequencies: Why we should avoid X-rays🚫 📖 From the book the world without cancer the story of b17.

👍133

19 Jan 2025, 16:02 UTC≈3,400 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @primalstudy

Carnivores don't taste sweet. https://www.nih.gov/news-events/nih-research-matters/carnivores-lack-taste-sweets We do.

👍81👏1

10 Jan 2025, 15:04 UTC≈3,690 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥28👍7🤯21🤩1

10 Jan 2025, 10:40 UTC≈3,500 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @primalstudy

500 Unvaccinated vs 3000 Vaccinated children. The more vaccines children recieved, the more sick they were, and unvaccinated children had fraction of the illnesses the vaccinated had. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7709050/ People who are absolutely ignorant and don't care about safety and health of children will claim that studies like theese do not prove causation, however only correlation. That might

16👍8🙏1

8 Jan 2025, 13:14 UTC≈3,170 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Buteyko Breathing Method 🌬 Most people today breathe too quickly, often over-breathing, which reduces oxygen levels in the body and contributes to chronic illnesses like heart disease, asthma, diabetes🌬 Healthy breathing typically corresponds to 6-7 L/min, while many people breathe 12-16 L/min, leading to worsened health. 😷 The Buteyko breathing method focuses on slowing breathing to restore the body’s natural ox

11👍10🔥4🤔1

6 Jan 2025, 12:35 UTC≈3,220 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Raw Milk Reduces Asthma, Eczema, Hay Fever, and Other Allergies in Children 🐄 The GABRIELA study, carried out across Germany, Austria, and Switzerland, involved 8,334 children from rural regions to investigate the effects of raw milk 🐄 on childhood asthma, eczema, hay fever, and other allergies. The results showed that children who drank raw milk had a 41% lower risk of developing asthma (adjusted odds ratio [aOR],

33

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @rawprimaldiet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Raw Primal Diet / Primal Healing” (@rawprimaldiet), 1,685 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rawprimaldiet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.