5 measurements spanning 22 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 199–200 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Sept 2026, 05:38
199
-1
27 Aug 2026, 07:23
200
+1
20 Aug 2026, 21:37
199
-1
13 Aug 2026, 14:30
200
no change
13 Aug 2026, 14:19
200
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 7 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1h 13m
Average length
6m 07s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
32 reactions across 12 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 93.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
30
93.8%
👍
2
6.25%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 February 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
امروز آخرین جلسه دوره برگزار شد و فیلم و صوت جلسه به همراه فایلهای نقشه ذهنی تحلیل و تبیینهای گذشته در حساب کاربری خریداران قرار گرفت.
🌐 برای خرید و دسترسی به فایل جلسات برگزار شده به لینک زیر مراجعه کنید:
👇👇👇
https://raveshmotalee.ir/?p=156252
#خط_امت
💠 مجموعه روش مطالعه
✅ @raveshmotalee_ir786
فیلم و صوت جلسه اول (۱۴۰۵/۰۵/۰۵) دوره آموزش کارگاهی تحلیل و تبیین پیامهای امام امت که نزدیک به ۳ ساعت بود در سایت قرار گرفت.
❌️ این دوره پشتیبانی بعد از خرید ندارد و تنها راه دریافت پشتیبانی و پاسخ به سوالات فقط در جلسه آنلاین دوره هست.
📥 بزرگوارانی که بعد از اتمام جلسات، دوره را خریداری کنند فقط به فایل ضبط شده جلسات دسترسی خواهند داشت.
🗓 انشاءالله جمعه آخرین جلسه آنلاین دوره برگزار میشود.
📌عزیزانی که تا قبل …
نمای کلی از محتوای تئوری دوره آموزش کارگاهی تحلیل و تبیین پیامهای امام امت
انشاءالله در بخش ابتدایی جلسه اول به ارائه کامل این محتوا میپردازم.
🌐 برای مشاهده جزئیات کامل و ثبتنام به لینک زیر مراجعه کنید:
👇👇👇
https://raveshmotalee.ir/?p=156252
#خط_امت
💠 مجموعه روش مطالعه
✅ @raveshmotalee_ir786
پاسخ به سوالات ارسالی شرکت کنندگان دوره آموزش کارگاهی تحلیل و تبیین پیامهای امام امت؛ پیرامون این دوره و سلسله محصولات #خط_امت
🌐 برای مشاهده جزئیات کامل و ثبتنام به لینک زیر مراجعه کنید:
👇👇👇
https://raveshmotalee.ir/?p=156252
💠 مجموعه روش مطالعه
✅ @raveshmotalee_ir786
📚 سلسله محصولات «خط امّت» (۱)
آموزش کارگاهی روش تحلیل و تبیین پیامهای امام امّت
در تلاطم اخبار و فتنههای آخرالزمان، تنها یک خط اصلی گمراهی را از انسان دور میکند: فهم درست و دقیق پیامهای امام امت.
این دوره برای این طراحی شده که مسیر تبدیل شدن به یک تبیینگر خوداتکا از یک شنونده صرف را به شما نشان دهد؛ تا بتوانید انشاءالله به کسی تبدیل شوید که هم خودش راه را گم نمیکند، هم چراغ راه دیگران میشود.
🎙 جلسات زنده و…
🎥 چرا گریه میکنی؟ 💔
ای امام عزیز و مظلوم و شهیدم
افتخار میکنم که بخاطر عشق به شما
توهین و تحقیر و تهمت شنیدم از کسانی که
در زمان حیات مبارکتان شما را تحریف میکردند
و در زمان شهادتتان از نام و یاد شما وجهه میگیرند.
⚠️این کلیپ همان روزهای ابتدایی شهادت اماممان در سایت منتشر شد.
💠 مجموعه روش مطالعه
✅ @raveshmotalee_ir786
📝 چرا رتبههای برتر آزمون وکالت، «مطالعه خطی» و «تندخوانی» را کنار گذاشتهاند؟
اگر داوطلب آزمون وکالت یا دستیاری پزشکی هستید، احتمالاً در کوهی از منابع قطور، سنگین و پیچیده غرق شدهاید.
خیلیها وقتی زمان کم میآورند، سراغ روشهای «تندخوانی زرد» میروند؛ مثلاً سعی میکنند صدای درونشان را خفه کنند تا فقط با چشم سریعتر بخوانند!
🧠 اما علم شناختی ثابت کرده است که این کار برای متون تخصصی یک فاجعه است! مغز انسان برای در…
🎥 سه تکنیک حفظ مطالب مورد نیاز
ا🗓ا ۱۴۰۰/۰۸/۰۸
👈 مشاهده و ثبتنام در دوره آنلاین عکس خوانی ذهنی 👉
#عکس_خوانی_ذهنی
💠 مجموعه روش مطالعه
✅ @raveshmotalee_ir786
📝 ۵ باور اشتباه درباره تندخوانی که شما را از مطالعه واقعی دور میکند
چه میشود اگر به شما بگوییم برخی از اساسیترین تکنیکهایی که در دورههای تندخوانی آموزش داده میشود، بر اساس تصورات نادرستی از نحوه کارکرد واقعی مغز ما بنا شدهاند؟ چه میشود اگر مبارزه برای سریعتر خواندن، در واقع مبارزه علیه طبیعت شناختی ما باشد؟ این مقاله به بررسی عمیق پنج حقیقت شگفتانگیز و خلاف تصور عمومی میپردازد که نشان میدهد چگونه برخی از…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @raveshmotalee_ir786. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@raveshmotalee_ir786 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@raveshmotalee_ir named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مجموعه روش مطالعه” (@raveshmotalee_ir786), 199 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/raveshmotalee_ir786.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.