Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ravelin

@rave_lin

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry

538subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001976305724
TypeChannel
Username@rave_lin
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/rave_lin

Growth

5388 Aug 2026, 07:17 — 538 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 13:38 — 538 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 07:178 Aug 2026, 13:38
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 537–539 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 13:38538no change
8 Aug 2026, 07:17538first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
73.1%
avg views ÷ 538 subscribers
Avg views / post
393
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.60%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held20 (10 May 20264 August 2026)
Views total2,754
Reactions total44
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 07:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
35s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

168 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53709244941960563576236.9%
custom 53954816139560536405331.5%
custom 53706768721515720214023.8%
custom 537310799543980039774.17%
custom 535947966477764358663.57%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 168reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 18:50 UTC182 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

накидайте пж ваших любимых мемов по типу таких(если будет 0 комментариев за 67 минут я расстроюсь(()

custom 53731079954398003972custom 53706768721515720211custom 53709244941960563571custom 53954816139560536401

25 Jul 2026, 17:55 UTC552 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

самая важная вл могнута 67)

custom 53709244941960563577custom 53706768721515720212custom 53954816139560536402

25 Jul 2026, 10:52 UTC278 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @zdankeviz_storePhoto

🎁 РОЗЫГРЫШ 2 КОПИЙ EA FC 27 ULTIMATE PLUS EDITION!🎁 В честь скорого выхода новой части запускаем большой розыгрыш в ZDANKEVIZ STORE — сразу 2 победителя получат по одной копии EA FC 27 Ultimate Plus Edition 🔥 Условия участия: — Быть подписанным на наш канал — Вступить в чат и оставаться в нём до окончания розыгрыша* — Нажать кнопку «Участвовать» под этим постом Участие в чате будет проверяться непосредственно пр

custom 53709244941960563572

21 Jul 2026, 00:43 UTC408 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

стримы выходят на новый уровень🥶🇵🇹🎀

custom 53954816139560536406custom 53709244941960563573custom 53706768721515720211

18 Jul 2026, 20:35 UTC438 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

заведение che cafe на садовой полное дерьмо не ходите сюда ожидание долгое блюда пресные и безвкусные в целом прайс не высокий, но за него можно найти чото в разы интересней

custom 53709244941960563575custom 53706768721515720211custom 53731079954398003971custom 53954816139560536401

15 Jul 2026, 16:20 UTC440 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

все я сгорел.. *музыка из эдита*

custom 53706768721515720212custom 53709244941960563571custom 53954816139560536401

15 Jul 2026, 08:35 UTC456 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 53709244941960563572custom 53594796647776435861custom 53954816139560536401

8 Jul 2026, 18:06 UTC644 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ArchivoVAR провели судейский разбор всех спорных эпизодов матча и пришли к выводу что судья допустил 13 ключевых ошибок в этой игре Французский арбитр получил оценку 0 из 10 за матч между Аргентиной и Египтом — ArchivoVAR Итог матча рассматривается и может быть отменен

custom 53706768721515720212custom 53954816139560536402custom 53709244941960563571

7 Jul 2026, 18:11 UTC510 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @risenhahaVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 53706768721515720211custom 53709244941960563571custom 53954816139560536401

27 Jun 2026, 18:56 UTC813 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

все ближе и ближе к нормису..

custom 53709244941960563575custom 53706768721515720214custom 53594796647776435863

18 Jun 2026, 00:23 UTC821 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 53709244941960563574custom 53954816139560536403custom 53594796647776435862custom 53731079954398003971

12 Jun 2026, 09:56 UTC887 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

CEO: C l_l_l O tokkett ✌️ C l_l_l O rava 🤫 C l_l_l O nickbenzo ☠️

custom 53954816139560536405custom 53709244941960563574custom 53706768721515720212

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rave_lin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 952,285 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ravelin” (@rave_lin), 538 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rave_lin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.