Haliyam obuna bo’lmadinggizmi?
🔥3
Channel
@raulataxonov
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
62subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002012892063 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @raulataxonov |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/raulataxonov |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:35 | 62 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:31 | 63 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:04 | 63 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
170 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 138 | 81.2% | |
| custom 5271892207731745354 | 13 | 7.65% | |
| custom 5870873908814553579 | 11 | 6.47% | |
| custom 5039783602301175152 | 8 | 4.71% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 170 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 February 2025 to 8 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Haliyam obuna bo’lmadinggizmi?
🔥3
@raulbek_ataxonov – asosiy yangiliklar bu yerda!
🔥4
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥4
Let’s back to this place
🔥7
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥6
Sticker, posted without a caption
🔥3custom 52718922077317453542
😛
custom 58708739088145535795🔥4custom 52718922077317453544
Insonlar va ichki dunyolar 🟡 “Odamlarni asl yuzini endi bildim”degan ibora sizga ham tanish bo’lsa kerak, buni ichki dunyo deb tariflaymiz, va har kim unga ega bo’lishga haqli, insonlar bilan qanchalik yaqin munosabatda bo’lishinggiz, og’ir vaziyatlar, qiyin sinovlar bu yaqqol namoyon bo’la boradi, va bu sizga yoqadimi yo’qmi, insonlarning qanday tarbiya olgani va qay sharoitda o’sganiga bog’liq. O’zgartirishga hara…
🔥5custom 52718922077317453542custom 58708739088145535792custom 50397836023011751521
Doimo band bo‘ling Odam harakat bilan tirik hisoblanadi. Chunki insonning miyasi, tanasi va ruhi har doim harakat, izlanish, o‘sish uchun yaratilgan. Bo‘sh odam o‘zini yeb tugatadi: bekorchilikda asossiz tashvishlar, yomon odatlar, ortiqcha o‘ylash, asab buzilishlari boshlanadi. Chunki inson energiyasi ishga emas, ichki chirish jarayoniga ketadi. Qarang, tabiatda ham tirik daraxt doimo o‘sadi: poya, barg, ildiz - …
🔥8custom 52718922077317453542custom 58708739088145535792custom 50397836023011751521
Siz zo’rsiz! Ko’pdan buyon Activist nomi bilan tanilgan Xojakbar Nosirov, judayam yaxshi bir mavzuni ko’tarib chiqdi, men buni tilsizlar deb atadim, o’zini ona tilisini ishlatishni o’rniga chet tillarida (ayniqsa Rus tilida) muloqat qilishni moda qilib olganlar, o’zini ko’rsatish uchun boshqa chet tilini emas o’z ona tilisida gapirshni eskilik sarqiti deb atashadi, bilib qo’ying, o’z tilini yo’qatgan Davlat, eng bi…
🔥8custom 50397836023011751521custom 52718922077317453541custom 58708739088145535791
After too long break, it’s time to treat my body, this is fascinating without studies in your favourite place.)
🔥15custom 52718922077317453542custom 58708739088145535791
I wasn’t satisfied, but why? Over the 6 months of IELTS, I tried really hard to achieve 7 but failed. One of the crucial reasons is speaking. I was the last person who examiner had to take speaking test and when i got there and he was upset about smth and i thought he was tired. Whole period of speaking passed frustratingly because of my anxiety about his emotions, He was giving tones of questions but i spoke withou…
🔥12
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @raulataxonov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Raulbek Ataxonov” (@raulataxonov), 62 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/raulataxonov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.