Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for rattled by the rush

Channel

rattled by the rush

@rattledbytherush

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,123subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001267054278
TypeChannel
Username@rattledbytherush
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/rattledbytherush

Growth

1,1231,1251,1247 August 2026 — 1,124 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,124 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,125 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,123 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,123–1,125 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 16:491,123-2
9 Aug 2026, 22:211,125+1
7 Aug 2026, 08:131,124no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:161,124first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 22 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

466 reactions across 16 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
14330.7%
❤‍🔥12927.7%
👍5612.0%
🔥5110.9%
😁357.51%
👏132.79%
🥰112.36%
💘91.93%
51.07%
💔40.858%
20.429%
🍓20.429%
🎉20.429%
👀20.429%
🕊10.215%
🤡10.215%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 466reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2025 to 12 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rattledbytherush. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2025 to 12 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 May 2026, 16:35 UTC≈1,040 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Как я сегодня внезапно узнал от Арсена Вольского, на сайте IMEC (французский архив, собирающий документы по издательствам, журналам, писателям, журналистам и просто hommes de lettres XX века) уже много лет как выложена двойная опись архива Луи Альтюссера. Во-первых, там есть полный перечень его личной библиографии в ее монографической части, при чем с полным приведением дарственных подписей и информации о том, наскол

👍125🔥5❤‍🔥42💘2🤡1

9 May 2026, 21:51 UTC≈1,160 views48 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ради продолжения шутки добавлю, что ссылками на единственно-верную сталинскую философию славились во Франции далеко не только малоизвестные комментаторы Руссо и совсем прямые марксисты в совсем прямо-марксистких книгах. Лично мой любимый момент — это вторая часть бартовских "Мифологий" (которые, конечно, марксистские, но все таки не совсем в том же смысле), а именно подглавка про миф как семиологическую систему. В не

😁298❤‍🔥6💔4🔥1

9 May 2026, 21:51 UTC857 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @misreadings

https://teletype.in/@hydrochoerus_isthmius/IsaPJ5QqPM

😁65

23 Sept 2025, 13:10 UTC≈1,800 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Александр Сковородко написал отличную серию постов о Ницше, его интерпретации у Клоссовски, интерпретации его интерпретации в "Анти-Эдипе" и критике этой последней в "Онтологии революции" Лардро-Жамбе. Поскольку всю последнюю неделю я убил на кусок диссертации об интерпретации вечного возвращения у Клоссовски, ну и просто ради того, чтобы поддержать форс неочевидного набора текстов, напишу тут несколько занимательных

14❤‍🔥9

23 Sept 2025, 13:10 UTC≈1,950 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

II. Организованный Делезом конгресс в Ройомоне, который был посвящен Ницше, и котором также пишет Александр, является еще одной интереснейшей темой. Ницще-конгрессы во Франции вообще были забавной штукой: опять же, тот же Гандийак пишет (p. 426), что на конгрессе 1972о года в Сериси-ля-Саль французские левые ницшеанцы сильно шокировали Карла Лёвита и Ойгена Финка, привыкших, что Ницше и его философия интересуют лишь

11❤‍🔥5

23 Sept 2025, 13:10 UTC≈2,800 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Доклад мсье Клоссовски показался мне настолько великолепным, что, быть может, мы больше не должны обсуждать вечное возвращение в общем и целом. Мсье Клоссовски смог связать три ницшеанские темы совершенно новым образом: смерть Бога, вечное возвращение и волю к власти. Прежде всего смерть Бога, потому что он сказал нам, что Бог был единственным гарантом, единственной субстанциональной основой тождества "я" [moi]. Одно

10❤‍🔥9

23 Sept 2025, 13:10 UTC≈3,720 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026

III. Изначально хотел написать про это больше, но коли и так уже текста набирается на >10к знаков, то ограничусь лишь коротким замечанием: несмотря на все видимое сходство, дружбу и попытки интеграции теорий Клоссовски в собственные философские труды, Делез чисто-мировоззренчески был от него невероятно далек, и особенно хорошо это становится видно как раз при пристальном вглядывании в моменты этих самых интеграций. П

18💘7👏6

2 Sept 2025, 23:52 UTC≈2,190 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

12👏6🔥5❤‍🔥1

2 Sept 2025, 23:51 UTC≈2,140 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Только что узнал от своего прекрасного товарища Глеба (недавно, к слову, выпустившего статью на необычную у нас и крайне интересную тему феноменологической теологии у Гуссерля, которую всем активно рекомендую) эпохальную новость из рубрики #лесозаготовки : на аннас архив наконец-то выложили французскую оригинальную версию "Маркса" Мишеля Анри целиком. Говорить о книге в подробностях было бы излишне: это действительно

15🔥7🥰6❤‍🔥2👏1

1 Sept 2025, 18:07 UTC≈1,450 views28 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Лето медленно, но верно подошло к концу, а это значит, что пора доделать или, во всяком случае, начать доделывать летние дела — и начну я этот непростой процесс с вещи, недавно анонсированной Артемом, а именно — с своеобразной рецензии-размышления-обзора на совсем свеже-вышедшую книжку Ирины Блауберг "Эпистемология истории философии во Франции в XX столетии". Начать стоит с того, что предыдущие книжки Блауберг посв

12❤‍🔥9👍7

1 Sept 2025, 18:07 UTC≈1,190 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Начну я с того, что книга, в полном соответствии с текстами обсуждаемых в ней авторов, является чрезвычайно приятной и доброй. Слово "добрая" может показаться странным, но ничего иного тут измыслить я не могу: читая тексты Блауберг о французских историках философии, испытываешь то же ощущение, что и при чтении их самих, а именно — своеобразное бергсонистское вдохновение, напоминающее о том, зачем ты вообще занимаешьс

❤‍🔥13👍8🔥52

1 Sept 2025, 18:07 UTC≈1,320 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Я имею в виду прекрасное описание того самого "статического" (но, разумеется, не лишенного от этого описания окружавшей и формировавшей его динамики) идейного среза, задававшего правила и общий тон всей французской университетской философии XX столетия. Начиная с взглядов Бергсона и некоторых историков XIX столетия и заканчивая последней короткой главой, посвященной раннему Рикеру, книга Блауберг позволяет увидеть те

❤‍🔥11👍8🔥62

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @rattledbytherush. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,369,910 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“rattled by the rush” (@rattledbytherush), 1,123 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rattledbytherush.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.