Channel
@ratatatatarututututu
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
170subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002049830987 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ratatatatarututututu |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ratatatatarututututu |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 23:59 | 170 | -4 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 07:15 | 174 | +1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:24 | 173 | +2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:18 | 171 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:30 | 172 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:46 | 172 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
164 reactions across 12 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5969746486919960543 | 32 | 19.5% | |
| custom 5366363440791170774 | 30 | 18.3% | |
| custom 5366093420492240471 | 19 | 11.6% | |
| custom 5366219589451526975 | 16 | 9.76% | |
| custom 5971775618449151808 | 16 | 9.76% | |
| custom 5366426813033621626 | 14 | 8.54% | |
| custom 5969926849776589933 | 13 | 7.93% | |
| custom 5366083782585627472 | 9 | 5.49% | |
| custom 5366172555264667841 | 8 | 4.88% | |
| custom 5972301584439188045 | 4 | 2.44% | |
| custom 5366365944757102143 | 3 | 1.83% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 164 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ratatatatarututututu. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 June 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
💙💙🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟💙 💙 ✨✨✨ ✨ ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ 🤩 ✨✨✨✨ 🤩 ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ Ft 🌸🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🌸 #Котвсапогах #PussinBootscosplay #PussinBoots
custom 59699268497765899335custom 59697464869199605434custom 59717756184491518083custom 59723015844391880451
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 59697464869199605439
Тᥲκᥙх уᥔʍᥲ… κ᧐ᴦдᥲ нᥙδудь я д᧐дᥱ᧘ᥲю ʙᥴё ᥙ уᥔду ʙ ɜᥲκᥲᴛ 👾
custom 59697464869199605437
Сʍ᧐ᴛρя κᥲκ᧐ᥔ 🚶
custom 59697464869199605437
𐌿ρᥙʙᥱᥱ!! Вᥴᥱ х᧐ρ᧐ɯ᧐. А у ʙᥲᥴ? Иɜ ᥙнᴛᥱρᥱᥴн᧐ᴦ᧐ ᴛ᧐᧘ьκ᧐ ᥴκ᧐ρыᥔ ᥰᥙκнᥙκ. А ᥙɜ κ᧐ᥴᥰ᧘ᥱᥱʙ ϶ᴛ᧐ Э᧐᧘ ᥙɜ epic the musical ᥙ Рыцᥲρь ᥙɜ Hollow Knight Бу᧘ьδу᧘ьδу᧘ь 😠
custom 59697464869199605435custom 59723015844391880453custom 59699268497765899332
🔎ПОИСК 🔎 ‼️Ищем персонажей по Хвосту феи для выступления на Aкай Ёкай ‼️ В особенности ищем основных персонажей ( главных героев), но также рассмотрим любых персонажей Рассмотрим варианты с готовыми образами и с не доделаными( будет возможность подготовиться) Имеется: Эрза Люси Джувия Если есть желание поучаствовать пишите : @Chrome_meow Просим репостик 🛐
custom 59699268497765899333
t.me/anonaskbot?start=nfdxn 𐌺ᥲκ нᥲ ᥴчᥱᴛ ᥲн᧐нᥙʍκᥙ? ☺️
custom 59699268497765899333
⋆.ೃ 𝒥𝒶𝓇 𝑜𝒻 𝒥𝒶𝓂 ࿔*:･ !РЕСТ! pinned a photo
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 𝘒𝘯𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 💙💙 𝘓𝘪𝘵𝘵𝘭𝘦 𝘎𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘵 💙💙 👾 𝘉𝘶𝘵 𝘯𝘰𝘣𝘰𝘥𝘺 𝘤𝘢𝘮𝘦. 👾 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Рᥱᴛуɯь: https://t.me/AntiV0id
custom 597177561844915180813custom 53661725552646678418custom 53663634407911707745custom 53664268130336216261
https://t.me/sstrudeln - Л᧐᧘᧐᧘᧐ɯκᥲ. А ʙᥙдᥱ᧐ ᥱᥴᴛь у ʍᥱня ʙ ᴛᥙκ ᴛ᧐κᥱ!! https://www.tiktok.com/@jar_of_jemmy?_r=1&_t=ZS-9899q2bcbnl 🎀
custom 536636344079117077415custom 53663659447571021433custom 53664268130336216262
⋆.ೃ 𝒥𝒶𝓇 𝑜𝒻 𝒥𝒶𝓂 ࿔*:･ !РЕСТ! pinned a photo
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩 💜💜💜💜💜 🤩 🤩🤩🤩 🤩 – 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐚 𝐛𝐢𝐠 𝐠𝐢𝐫𝐥𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐰…. 🤩𝐍𝐨 𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐙𝐢𝐳𝐳𝐲’𝐬 𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐭𝐥𝐞 𝐠𝐢𝐫𝐥𝐬 🤩🤩🤩 🄵🅁🄾🄼: 🅁🄾🄱🄻🄾🅇 - 🄿🄸🄶🄶🅈
custom 536609342049224047116custom 536642681303362162611custom 53660837825856274729
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @ratatatatarututututu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“⋆.ೃ 𝒥𝒶𝓇 𝑜𝒻 𝒥𝒶𝓂 ࿔*:･ !РЕСТ!” (@ratatatatarututututu), 170 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ratatatatarututututu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.