Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🙏 ‎راستی 🙏

Channel

🙏 ‎راستی 🙏

@rasti1357

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

310subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001007293057
TypeChannel
Username@rasti1357
CreatedBetween 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/rasti1357

Growth

3103143127 August 2026 — 314 subscribers7 August 2026 — 314 subscribers13 August 2026 — 311 subscribers20 August 2026 — 312 subscribers26 August 2026 — 310 subscribers7 August 202626 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 19 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 309–315 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Aug 2026, 15:08310-2
20 Aug 2026, 15:42312+1
13 Aug 2026, 12:06311-3
7 Aug 2026, 09:41314no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:47314first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.0%
avg views ÷ 310 subscribers
Avg views / post
43.4
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (26 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total477
Reactions total32
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 05:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

61 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3049.2%
👍2439.3%
🥰58.20%
😁23.28%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 61reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC25 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

بلوغ یعنی پذیرش این واقعیت که انسان‌ها برای آنچه که هستند مقصر نیستند، اما برای آنچه که انجام می‌دهند مسئولند. @rasti1357

👍3

5 Aug 2026, 14:48 UTC25 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

در روانشناسی دلبستگی، احساس امنیت فقط به «دوست داشته شدن» مربوط نیست؛ بلکه به قضاوت نشدن مربوط است. کارل راجرز، از بنیان‌گذاران روان‌درمانی انسان‌گرا، معتقد بود یکی از عمیق‌ترین نیازهای انسان، تجربه‌ی پذیرش بی‌قیدوشرط (Unconditional Positive Regard) است؛ اینکه بتوانی خودِ واقعی‌ات را نشان بدهی، بدون ترس از شرم، طرد یا تحقیر. به همین دلیل، امن‌ترین روابط الزاماً رابطه‌هایی نیستند که در آن‌ها بیشترین شباهت وجود دارد؛

2

5 Aug 2026, 14:25 UTC24 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

كسيو دارى كه لايق اين جمله باشه؟ پروردگارا؛ سختى هايش را آسان و آرزوهايش را نزديك كن بفرست واسه‌ش @rasti1357

5

4 Aug 2026, 19:53 UTC30 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

یادآوری برای تویی که هنوز بیداری: ایرادی نداره اگه یه وقتایی ناراحت باشی یا حس ناکافی بودن داشته باشی؛ آدمیم دیگه، نمیشه که همیشه حالمون خوب باشه... https://t.me/rasti1357

2

4 Aug 2026, 10:44 UTC30 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

شما با آدم بالغ که معاشرت کنی میفهمی اصن چیزی به اسم روابط پیچیده انسانی وجود نداره. @rasti1357

👍1

4 Aug 2026, 10:44 UTC32 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

میزان سازش من در مقابل زندگی : https://t.me/rasti1357

🥰4

4 Aug 2026, 09:53 UTC32 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

​و در نهایت در جست و جوی تکیه گاهی به خویش میرسی... و زندگی بارها و بارها و بارها ، تو را با " خودت " رو به رو خواهد کرد. https://t.me/rasti1357

👍2

3 Aug 2026, 09:46 UTC41 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

بی انصاف ترین آدمها.... https://t.me/rasti1357

👍3

30 Jul 2026, 11:45 UTC83 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

اگر منتظر بمونی اول حالت خوب بشه و بعد زندگی کردن رو شروع کنی، ممکنه تا ابد منتظر بمونی. زندگی‌ات رو بکن. غمگین باش و انجامش بده. مضطرب باش و انجامش بده. مردد باش و انجامش بده. چون بهبود پیدا کردن همیشه قبل از تجربه کردن اتفاق نمی‌افته. گاهی خود تجربه‌ست که کم‌کم التیامت می‌ده. https://t.me/rasti1357

👍3

29 Jul 2026, 14:48 UTC82 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

فرار از زندانِ «نظرِ دیگران» اروین یالوم می‌گوید: اگر می‌خواهی با همسرت خوشبخت باشی، باید بتوانی بدون او هم خوشبخت باشی... حرف حساب است! ما مدام دنبالِ تاییدِ محیط هستیم. اگر لایک نگیریم، انگار وجود نداریم. اگر کسی نگوید “چقدر خوب هستی”، انگار فرو می‌ریزیم. واقعیت این است که آدم‌ها آن‌قدر درگیرِ حفره‌های روحِ خودشان هستند که فرصت نمی‌کنند واقعاً به تو فکر کنند. پس این همه تلاش برای “خوب به نظر رسیدن” برای کیست؟ نقاب

3

29 Jul 2026, 13:47 UTC73 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

سندرومِ «باید خوشحال باشم» این روزها یک جور استبدادِ "مثبت‌اندیشی" راه افتاده که اگر غمگین باشی، انگار مجرمی! اما داستایوفسکی خوب می‌دانست که رنج، تنها منبعِ آگاهی است. کسی که رنج نکشیده، سطحِ روحش صیقلی و صاف باقی می‌ماند؛ هیچ چیزی به او گیر نمی‌کند، هیچ عمیقی را نمی‌فهمد. غم، بخشی از سیستمِ دفاعیِ روح است. اجازه بده گاهی ابری باشی. لازم نیست مدام لبخندِ ژتونی بزنی. درخت‌ها هم تمام سال شکوفه نمی‌دهند؛ مدتی را باید

👍4

27 Jul 2026, 19:03 UTC74 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

من حسود نیستم‌؛ ولی تو لطفاً با هرکسی گرم نگیر. من حسود نیستم‌؛ ولی لقبی که برای من گذاشتیو برای یکی دیگه نذار. من حسود نیستم؛ ولی جوری که با من حرف میزنی با اونا حرف نزن. من حسود نیستم؛ ولی بدون حضور منم تو جشن هاشون نباش. من حسود نیستم؛ ولی لطفا وقتی ازش بدم میاد جلوی من حرفشو نزن. من حسود نیستم. فقط احساس میکنم اینا یه چیز عادیه و‌ تو وجود هر آدم دیگه ایم هست.💫♥️ @rasti1357

4🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rasti1357. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 584,881 of 1,620,105entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🙏 ‎راستی 🙏” (@rasti1357), 310 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rasti1357.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.