Channel
@rasstanovki_vip
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
89subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 4 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003717844779 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rasstanovki_vip |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 4 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rasstanovki_vip |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 01:00 | 89 | -4 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 23:16 | 93 | +4 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 02:22 | 89 | no change |
| 4 Sept 2026, 01:47 | 89 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (28 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 910 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Sept 2026, 02:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
5 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 3 | 60.0% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 40.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Чому саме вам клієнт не хоче платити? Чому саме вас роботодавець не обирає? Чому саме ваш чоловік не хоче давати гроші, допомагати чи дарувати подарунки? Сьогодні на підсумковій зустрічі інтенсиву «Вихід із Тіні» ми зробили структурну розстановку саме про це. І відповіді в кожної були різні. Не «всі чоловіки жадібні». Не «ринок зараз такий». Не «клієнти не готові платити». Не «роботодавці шукають молодших». Кожна…
Де зараз найбільший розрив між "Я знаю" та "Я роблю"?
The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🎧 ПОДКАСТ «БЕЗ ГОНІТВИ» Чому ми так багато робимо для інших — і все одно боїмося, що нас не оберуть? Сьогодні говоримо про межу між турботою та спробою заслужити любов, визнання і своє місце. 🎧 Послухайте до кінця і дайте собі відповідь: де я досі намагаюся заслужити те, що хочу отримувати взаємно?
Одна з найцікавіших речей, яку я побачила у відгуках після інтенсиву «Вихід із тіні»: учасниці починали з людей, які їх дратують, а закінчували собою. Не «чому вона така нахабна?» А «чому я сама собі не дозволяю бути такою прямою?» Не «чому їй все так легко?» А «чому я вважаю, що хороше обов’язково треба заслужити великою кількістю страждань?» Одна учасниця написала, що почала з темної тіні, а в процесі побачила с…
Цікава картина. Квіз «Тінь мого вибору» прочитали 33 людини. Відповіли 19. А свої бали порахували й надіслали лише 4. І я думаю: це вже теж показово. Бо читати про тіні — одне. А побачити, що саме ти робиш, коли тебе не обирають, — зовсім інше. Хтось ховається. Хтось починає доводити свою цінність. Хтось наздоганяє. Хтось загалом добре тримається у взаємному виборі, але в окремих ситуаціях усе одно зривається у…
Ну що, пройшли квіз «Тінь мого вибору»? Тепер порахуємо результат. За кожну свою відповідь поставте 1 бал у відповідний варіант. Варіант 1: 1А, 2Б, 3Б, 4В, 5В, 6В, 7В, 8Б, 9Б, 10Г, 11Б, 12Г Варіант 2: 1Г, 2В, 3Г, 4Б, 5А, 6А, 7Г, 8Г, 9Г, 10Б, 11Г, 12В Варіант 3: 1В, 2Г, 3А, 4Г, 5Г, 6Г, 7А, 8А, 9А, 10А, 11А, 12А Варіант 4: 1Б, 2А, 3В, 4А, 5Б, 6Б, 7Б, 8В, 9В, 10В, 11В, 12Б Наприклад: 1 — 2 бали 2 — 5 балів 3 — 4…
❤2
А тепер не поспішайте аналізувати. Просто збережіть свої 12 відповідей. Бо важливо не: «Скільки разів мене не обрали?» А: «КИМ Я СТАЮ, КОЛИ МЕНЕ НЕ ОБИРАЮТЬ?» Тою, яка ховається? Тою, яка доводить? Тою, яка наздоганяє? Чи тією, яка може сказати: «Я зробила свій вибір. Тепер подивлюся, чи збігається він із твоїм».
👍3
12. Закінчіть фразу максимально чесно: «Якщо мене не обрали…»
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
11. Коли вам особливо важливо, щоб вас обрали, ви частіше…
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
10. Що для вас найболючіше?
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
9. Ви зробили щось важливе, але майже не отримали реакції.
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
8. Є два варіанти.Перший явно обирає вас, але вам не дуже підходить. Другий дуже подобається вам, але майже не проявляє інтересу. Куди піде більше вашої уваги?
The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rasstanovki_vip. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 13 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Де зараз найбільший розрив між "Я знаю" та "Я роблю"?
The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
12. Закінчіть фразу максимально чесно: «Якщо мене не обрали…»
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
11. Коли вам особливо важливо, щоб вас обрали, ви частіше…
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
10. Що для вас найболючіше?
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
9. Ви зробили щось важливе, але майже не отримали реакції.
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
8. Є два варіанти.Перший явно обирає вас, але вам не дуже підходить. Другий дуже подобається вам, але майже не проявляє інтересу. Куди піде більше вашої уваги?
The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЧОМУ ВСЕ НЕ ТАК” (@rasstanovki_vip), 89 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rasstanovki_vip.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.