3 measurements spanning 37 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35–37 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Sept 2026, 15:41
37
+2
10 Aug 2026, 23:46
35
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:50
35
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 11 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
22 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
6
27.3%
❤
5
22.7%
👍
5
22.7%
👏
5
22.7%
🤔
1
4.55%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 11 April 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 17 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rashidxonovhorunxon. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 April 2026 to 23 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
DOMO qanday qilib millionlar ehtiyojiga aylandi?
12 oy ichida 2.3M+ auditoriya va MRR ko'rsatkichining 100 barobarga o'sishi — bu shunchaki omad emas, to'g'ri sinalgan gipotezalar va puxta unit-ekonomika natijasi.
🔹 Navbatdagi Pivot Talk’da DOMO asoschisi Alisher Tojiyev bilan ushbu keskin oʻsish ortida turgan real tajriba haqida ochiq gaplashamiz.
Efirda nimalarni bilib olasiz?
• Mahsulotni kunlik odatga aylantir…
OpenAI test vaqtida Hugging Face'ga kiberhujum qilganini tan oldi
OpenAI ma'lumotiga ko'ra, hodisa kompaniyaning ExploitGym nomli kiberxavfsizlik sinovi vaqtida sodir bo'lgan.
Sinovda GPT-5.6 Sol va hali ommaga taqdim etilmagan yana bir kuchliroq modelning maksimal imkoniyatlarini baholash uchun xavfsizlik cheklovlari vaqtincha o'chirilgan.
Modellar avval OpenAI test infratuzilmasidagi zaifliklardan foydalanib int…
Apple 1,5 TB operativ xotirali Mac ustida ishlamoqda
Apple sun'iy intellekt uchun mo'ljallangan yangi avlod Mac kompyuterlari ustida ishlamoqda. Insayderlar bergan ma'lumotlarga ko'ra, kompaniya ishlab chiqayotgan M7 Ultra chipi 1,5 TB gacha unified memory (yagona operativ xotira)’ni qo'llab-quvvatlashi mumkin.
Agar bu tasdiqlansa, yangi Mac Apple tarixidagi eng kuchli va eng qimmat kompyuterlardan biriga aylanishi…
Claude'da g'alati holat bo'ldi 🤔
Doim bir xil ishlataman (asosan Opus 4.8), lekin:
- Haftalik limit 3 kunda tugadi
- Fable 5'ni ~1 soat ishlatib $192 usage yeb ketibdi 😳
Support'ga yozdim. Kimdir shunga o'xshash holatga duch
keldingizmi? Hammasi Fable 5'ni deb bo‘ldimi? Fable 5 shunchalik "och"mi? 👇
@rashidxonovhorunxon
Anthropic oyiga $200 lik obunani sovg‘a qilmoqda!
Anthropic kompaniyasi Claude for Open Source dasturini kengaytirdi. Endi ochiq kodli loyihalar mualliflari va hamjamiyatga hissa qo‘shuvchi dasturchilar Claude Max obunasini 6 oyga mutlaqo bepul qo‘lga kiritishlari mumkin.
Claude Max nima beradi? Oddiy tarifga qaraganda 20 barobar ko‘p limit (odatda buning narxi oyiga $200 turadi).
Kimlar ariza topshirishi mumkin?
…
Uygʻonsangiz, dunyo oʻzgarib ketgan boʻladi: Anthropic asoschisi AI olamining ichki sirlarini ochdi
Hozirgi kunda sunʼiy intellekt olamining markazida turish qanday his ekanini tasvirlash qiyin. Men buni xuddi Yer yuzidan yorugʻlik tezligiga yaqin tezlikda uzoqlashayotgan kosmik kemaga oʻxshatgan boʻlardim. Nisbiylik nazariyasiga koʻra, siz uxlashga yotasiz va uygʻonsangiz, Yerda ikki kun oʻtib ketgan boʻladi – yaʼn…
AQSh Savdo vazirligi Claude Fable 5 va Mythos 5 modellari bo‘yicha eksport cheklovlarini bekor qildi. Anthropic ma’lum qilishicha, ertadan boshlab foydalanuvchilar uchun kirish bosqichma-bosqich tiklanadi. Yaqin kunlarda qo‘shimcha yangilanishlar ham e’lon qilinadi.
@pivotuzbekistan
https://neuform.ai/
Open Sourced DESIGN.md. ishlatib korila
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @rashidxonovhorunxon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Horun ar Rashid” (@rashidxonovhorunxon), 37 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rashidxonovhorunxon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
