Channel
@rashid_kusembaev_channel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
653subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002231357576 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rashid_kusembaev_channel |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rashid_kusembaev_channel |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 17:01 | 653 | -2 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 05:56 | 655 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:12 | 657 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:19 | 659 | +2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:26 | 657 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:35 | 662 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:05 | 662 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 27 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
47 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 13 | 27.7% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 23.4% | |
| ❤ | 9 | 19.1% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 14.9% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 6.38% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 4.26% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 2.13% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 2.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 27 September 2025 to 17 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rashid_kusembaev_channel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 September 2025 to 17 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Сегодня эта мысль пришла мне после разговора с «клиентом». Есть такие клиенты кто думает отсидеться в засаде. Типа пусть ребята работают, а мы сами будем работать как привыкли. Разберем ситуацию: Мы делаем стационарный мерч совмещенный в Магнум. Мы там каждый день весь день. Мы свет в окошке для Зав секции. Делаем кроме своей работы много полезного магазину. Мы выставляем продукцию нашего клиента (читай брата) …
🔥5❤🔥1
Кодекс хищника: Яутджа ни для кого не добыча. Яутджа ни для кого не друг. Яутджа для всех хищник. (Хищник. Планета смерти)
Мы начали летом и уже в сентябре планировали выйти в магазины с командой. Но реальность: вчера (15 декабря) мы выложили нашу первую полку. Саботаж был на каждом шагу: у сети, у клиентов, у исполнителей. Не смотря на то что «мы за все хорошее и против всего плохого» и всем от этого проекта только лучше. Тем не менее приходилось всем все разъяснять. А все что хорошо работает в России в Казахстане пришлось поправлять…
👍4
Локализация бизнеса в другой стране Мы запустили проект по стационарному совмещенному мерчендайзингу в Казахстане. Этой идее много лет и она успешно реализована в России. Пришло время повторить его в Казахстане. Но все сразу пошло не так как было в плане. Скажу вам по секрету: план никогда не совершенен и всегда есть от него отклонения. Все как один инвесторы говорят что бизнес план и Фин план это лишь видение …
👍6
Кому инвестиции?))
😁2❤1👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
Сегодня на обучении венчурным инвестициям в Most IT hub в Алмате. Все базовые вещи и плюс статистика по Казахстану. Выводы: - рынок маленький пока - стартапы оцениваются в 2 разв дешевле чем в России и в 5-6 чем в США - многие сделки не афишируются или не чистый венчур - скорее скупают команду. - если хочется поиграть в эту тему то можно потренироваться с маленькими чеками
Video, posted without a caption
❤2
📢История успеха или провал? 🔘Почему чужие истории успеха не работают? 🔘Какие ошибки и планы были ранее? 🔘В каком контексте идея сработала? 🔘Что именно стало решающим фактором успеха? 📍Это лишь малая часть условий, которые важно проанализировать 💌Если вы хотите найти болевую точку своего бизнеса, обращайтесь, не занимайтесь самолечением @Rashid_Kusembaev
📢Чем КИТ отличается от других бизнес-клубов? ⚠️ КИТ - это одна большая международная семья 🔘Персональное сопровождение и индивидуальный подход к каждому - подробнее делюсь в видео 👆 💌Вступайте в КИТ и делитесь в комментариях - состоите ли вы в бизнес-сообществе?
🔥1
📢Как принимать решения, когда нет данных? 💡Что делать? 1️⃣ Экспертное мнение 2️⃣ Сценарный анализ 🔘Здесь бизнес-сообщества играют ключевую роль 🔘В клубе, как КИТ, рядом с вами всегда есть эксперты, которые могут поделиться решением 🔘Это возможность принимать решения быстрее и надёжнее, чем если бы вы полагались только на собственные догадки 💌Если у тебя возникла сложная ситуация, которую надо немедленно решить, п…
👍2❤1👏1
😆😀☺️😆😂🥹🥰😘 📍Обновил для вас подборку полезных постов о бизнесе ⬇️Путь предпринимателя: 🔘Бриллиант КИТа - ПЛТ 🔘Стационарный мерчендайзинг 🔘Почему ко мне приходят клиенты? 🔘Что обсудить с партнером до того, как прыгнете в лодку 🔘Партнерское соглашение 🔘Почему инвесторы говорят «нет», даже если проект гениальный? 🔘Как на самом деле привлекаются инвесторы 🔘Оффлайн или онлайн? 🔘Ошибки в коммуникациях 🔘Можно ли повторить…
👏4❤2🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @rashid_kusembaev_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Рашид Кусембаев. Бизнес. Как это работает на самом деле.” (@rashid_kusembaev_channel), 653 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rashid_kusembaev_channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.