Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Rashad Turkey: Жизнь в Турции

Channel

Rashad Turkey: Жизнь в Турции

@rashadturkey

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,404subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001670159101
TypeChannel
Username@rashadturkey
Created26 February 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/rashadturkey

Growth

1,4041,4161,4107 August 2026 — 1,416 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,416 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,413 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,409 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,404 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,402–1,418 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 12:371,404-5
13 Aug 2026, 18:181,409-4
11 Aug 2026, 01:551,413-3
7 Aug 2026, 06:311,416no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:271,416first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 11 September 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

209 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍15574.2%
😱3114.8%
🎉188.61%
😢52.39%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 209reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 11 September 2024 to 25 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Jul 2025, 17:41 UTC≈1,290 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @rashadnadzhafovVideo

Video, posted without a caption

👍6🎉1

18 Jul 2025, 17:31 UTC≈1,340 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @rashadnadzhafov

Что решил? Сделать подкаст. Да, формат вроде как уже заезженный. Все уже кого-то зовут, с кем-то болтают. Но я хочу иначе. Я не зову людей просто ради просмотров. Я зову тех, кто мне близок по духу, у кого чистая репутация, здравая позиция, интересный путь. Это не всегда суперзвёзды, но всегда — люди с чем-то настоящим внутри. Я стараюсь раскрыть их по-настоящему. Чтобы вы увидели, почувствовали, поняли. Чтобы вы мо

👍11

27 May 2025, 18:18 UTC≈1,270 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Неинформативные хроники: пара слов о каналах, от которых стоит отписаться Никого не хочу обидеть. Правда. Особенно авторов Telegram-каналов, которые честно собирают новости, вычитывают источники, делают аналитику. Такие есть - и за них спасибо. Их читать приятно: и глаз не дёргается, и мозг включается. Но есть и другая категория. Те, кто уверенно вещает, не проверяя. Кто пишет не тексты, а цифровой самиздат в духе

👍9

25 Apr 2025, 17:31 UTC≈1,200 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⛺ Почему в моем районе до сих пор стоят палатки? Палатка во дворе — не туристы, не пикник. Местные живут здесь уже несколько дней. (Сегодняшняя фотография в моем районе). После недавнего толчка (4.7) многие вспомнили землетрясение 2023 года, где погибли тысячи. Сейчас никто не пострадал, но страх остался. Кто эти люди? — Те, кто в палатках: «Не могу зайти в дом — кажется, стены дышат». Для них это способ переждать

👍11🎉2

15 Apr 2025, 16:42 UTC≈1,100 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Про бойкот Espresso Lab — по вашим многочисленным (три) запросам. Да, та самая история. Espresso Lab в Турции действительно бойкотируют. Но не все — определённая часть населения, а именно — приверженцы светской оппозиционной партии CHP. Бойкот приписывают одному из лидеров партии, который открыто заявил, мол, хватит ходить туда за кофе. Он даже лично участвовал в акции бойкота, и по Стамбулу прокатились волны с пла

👍12😱5

14 Apr 2025, 15:55 UTC827 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Контраст, который говорит сам за себя. После полного разочарования в Kahve Dünyası (если пропустили — предыдущий пост), я зашёл в Espresso Lab. И — неожиданно — остался доволен. Кофе оказался на уровне. Но важный момент: всё зависит от бариста. Если внятно и по-человечески объяснить, как надо — постарается, сделает нормально. Без хамства, с минимальной заботой. А это, согласитесь, уже редкость. Espresso Lab мне за

👍10🎉2

14 Apr 2025, 10:44 UTC784 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Kahve Dünyası — больше не тот. Раньше я всегда защищал эту кофейню. Уютно, удобно, вроде бы неплохо. Но в последнее время… Всё чаще слышал от друзей: «Что с ними стало?» — и всё так же уверенно отвечал: «Да вы просто не туда попали». Но нет. Пора признать: они были правы. Сервис? Хромает. Кофе? Ужас. Честно, не ожидал, что обычный капучино окажется горькой кипящей жижей. Попросил переделать — сделали ещё хуже. Как?

👍14

4 Apr 2025, 09:50 UTC≈1,050 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Никогда не открывайте интернет D-SMART, я давно живу в Турции и хуже сервиса не видел, никому не рекомендую. Сотрудник D-Smart: а зачем Турктелеком не открыл? Я сама им пользуюсь

👍11😢1😱1

27 Mar 2025, 17:11 UTC≈1,270 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ситуация в Стамбуле за последнее время

👍7😱3

28 Sept 2024, 12:09 UTC≈1,750 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Как маркетинг работает, что везде этот дубайский шоколад

👍14🎉1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @rashadturkey. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Sept 2024, 09:09 UTCAnonymous Poll82 voters

Как вам посты про Дубай? 🇦🇪

  1. Мне интересно56%
  2. Ну такое себе6%
  3. Лучше давай про Турцию38%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 11 September 2024 to 25 July 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Rashad Turkey: Жизнь в Турции” (@rashadturkey), 1,404 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rashadturkey.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.