Channel
@raseshpsyteh
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
379subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 1 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002502406920 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @raseshpsyteh |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 1 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/raseshpsyteh |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 17:36 | 379 | -2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 16:16 | 381 | +1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:00 | 380 | no change |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:45 | 380 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (28 July 2026 – 1 September 2026) |
| Views total | 235 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 1 Sept 2026, 21:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
18 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 11 | 61.1% | |
| 🤣 | 5 | 27.8% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 11.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
چرا گاهی خواستههامون رو میگیم، اما طرف مقابلمون چیز دیگهای میشنوه؟ شاید مسئله فقط «نحوه گفتن» نباشه؛ گاهی لازم داریم اول تفاوتهای روانشناختی زن و مرد رو بهتر بشناسیم. در کارگاه هنر زن بودن قراره یاد بگیریم: ✨ خودمون رو عمیقتر بشناسیم ✨ تفاوتهای ساختاری روان زن و مرد رو درک کنیم ✨ خواستههامون رو با زبان شناخت و آگاهی بیان کنیم ✨ و رابطههامون رو آگاهانهتر تجربه کنیم اگر فکر میکنی این کارگاه میتونه برای …
گاهی آدم نمیخواد از زندگی فاصله بگیره؛ فقط مغزش دیگه مثل قبل توان ادامه دادن نداره… افسردگی میتونه روی بخشهایی از مغز که با احساس، انگیزه، تمرکز و تجربه لذت در ارتباطن اثر بذاره. پس قبل از اینکه به کسی بگیم «خودتو جمع کن»، شاید بهتره بپرسیم: «چی باعث شده اینقدر خسته باشی؟» 🤍 اگر خودت یا کسی که دوستش داری مدتهاست با این تغییرات درگیره، کمک گرفتن میتونه شروع یک مسیر بهتر باشه.
❤4
تنهایی یا نیاز به تنها بودن؟
راهکار های جلوگیری از خودافشایی…‼️
آخرین باری که واقعاً با هم حرف زدید کی بود؟ نه درباره کار، نه مشکلات خونه، نه برنامههای روزمره… درباره خودتون، احساساتتون و چیزهایی که توی دلتون میگذره. گاهی زوجها کنار هم زندگی میکنن، اما مدتهاست که از دنیای هم خبر ندارن… اگر حس میکنی سکوت داره بین شما فاصله میندازه، نادیدهاش نگیر🫠
اگه این روزها حوصله هیچکس رو نداری، زود کلافه میشی و حتی انجام کارهای ساده برات سخته… شاید «تنبل» نیستی! 👀 ممکنه ذهنت از مدتها فشار و درگیری، خسته شده باشه. خستگی روانی رو نباید نادیده گرفت؛ چون ذهن هم مثل بدن، وقتی بیش از حد تحت فشار باشه، بالاخره علامت میده🧠
👍1
چرا گاهی خواستههامون رو میگیم، اما طرف مقابلمون چیز دیگهای میشنوه؟ شاید مسئله فقط «نحوه گفتن» نباشه؛ گاهی لازم داریم اول تفاوتهای روانشناختی زن و مرد رو بهتر بشناسیم. در کارگاه هنر زن بودن قراره یاد بگیریم: ✨ خودمون رو عمیقتر بشناسیم ✨ تفاوتهای ساختاری روان زن و مرد رو درک کنیم ✨ خواستههامون رو با زبان شناخت و آگاهی بیان کنیم ✨ و رابطههامون رو آگاهانهتر تجربه کنیم اگر فکر میکنی این کارگاه میتونه برای …
👍1
Video, posted without a caption
❤2
استرس وقتی تموم نمیشه، دیگه فقط «استرس» نیست! 🚨 خستگی، بیحوصلگی، بیخوابی و زودرنجی میتونه نشونهی فشار روانی طولانیمدت باشه‼️
❤2
از دعوای زیاد میترسی؟ شاید چیزی که باید بیشتر نگرانش باشی، سکوت باشه! اختلاف نظر توی هر رابطهای طبیعیه؛ مهم اینه که بعد از اختلاف، چطور با هم رفتار میکنیم. وقتی بحث تبدیل به تحقیر و توهین بشه، یا یکی از طرفین برای مدت طولانی ارتباط رو قطع کنه، رابطه کمکم فرسوده میشه❌. گاهی هنوز میشه برای رابطهای که درگیر بحثه کاری کرد؛ اما وقتی یکی دیگه هیچ اهمیتی نمیده، ماجرا فرق میکنه😕
از سری مشکلات روانشناس ها😂
🤣5
ذهن تو همیشه حقیقت رو نمیگه… 🧠 گاهی یک فکر، آنقدر تکرار میشه که کمکم باورش میکنیم. اما هر فکری که وارد ذهنت میشه، لزوماً واقعیت نیست. اگر افکار مزاحم مدام برمیگردن و نمیذارن آرامش داشته باشی، نادیدهشون نگیر. 📞 اگر احساس میکنی افکار مزاحم و تکراری آرامشت رو مختل کرده، برای دریافت مشاوره و راهنمایی با ما تماس بگیر: ۰۲۱-۸۸۴۸۴۱۵۰
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @raseshpsyteh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کلینیک روان شناسی رسش” (@raseshpsyteh), 379 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/raseshpsyteh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.