Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ℛ𝒶𝓃𝓋𝓊

@ranvuui

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

124subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002250162181
TypeChannel
Username@ranvuui
CreatedBetween 1 August 2024 and 31 January 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ranvuui

Growth

1249 Aug 2026, 17:31 — 124 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 07:30 — 124 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 17:3110 Aug 2026, 07:30
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 123–125 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 07:30124no change
9 Aug 2026, 17:31124first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
83.6%
avg views ÷ 124 subscribers
Avg views / post
104
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held12 (27 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total1,140
Reactions total152
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
28s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

152 reactions across 10 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52176561810566383232919.1%
custom 54476635252772219621912.5%
custom 52154288067219645591711.2%
custom 52174290846608583361610.5%
custom 5465615062645365603159.87%
custom 5282791898426146592149.21%
custom 544721359738819460974.61%
custom 521769234468126831563.95%
custom 546547860294443469663.95%
custom 521757751014067436853.29%
custom 546534877467301385953.29%
custom 521768128943544963242.63%
custom 544488490477500823942.63%
custom 544508190203997628721.32%
custom 521760089623760225510.658%
custom 521787412058213718510.658%
custom 546526171998088700010.658%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 152reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 17:07 UTC27 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Фисташка, верни деньги Гере (#щп)

custom 54450819020399762871

7 Aug 2026, 21:59 UTC54 views18 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

☺️пустя 2 недели слез, пота, нервов и сломанной психики, я ее доделала… (#спойлер)

custom 52827918984261465928custom 54448849047750082393custom 54653487746730138593custom 54472135973881946091custom 54476635252772219621custom 54652617199808870001custom 54654786029444346961

6 Aug 2026, 18:28 UTC41 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @MogilkaCyxarikaPhoto

ЫЫЫ В Омске 7 августа, а это значит, что мне уже 17. Я в тотальном шоке с этого года, но хочу сказать, что я ни о чем не жалею, правда 🎀 Отдельную благодарность хочу выразить этим ребятам! Шибо и Элли Мои самые дорогие мне люди. Вы всегда были со мной не смотря ни на что. Я люблю вас всей душой. Спасибо вам, я вами дико дорожу💗 Муся, Ками, Муех, Ангелина Я безумно рада, что мы сблизились за этот год, спасибо вам

6 Aug 2026, 07:32 UTC60 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

МЕНЯ ВЫГНАЛИ УКЛАДЫВАТЬ ПАРИК НА БАЛКОН!! Ну а если серьезно, то постов нет из за этого косплана, который просто выедает меня по частицам…

custom 54476635252772219624custom 52827918984261465922custom 54472135973881946091custom 54656150626453656031

5 Aug 2026, 23:31 UTC67 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Хотите увидеть эту дамочку в моем исполнении?? (#опрос)

custom 54656150626453656038custom 54472135973881946093custom 52827918984261465922custom 54653487746730138592

31 Jul 2026, 22:27 UTC164 views30 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

😀🤍🤍🤍🤍🍕🤍🤍🤍🤍😀 😀😀 •𝔅𝔩𝔬𝔬𝔪• 😀😀 😀😀 — ᴹᵃᵍᶦᶜ ᵂᶦᶰˣ 😀😀 —— #cosplay #winatcos 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🌟🤩🤩::ℑ𝔥𝔢 𝔚𝔦𝔫𝔵 𝔐𝔞𝔤𝔦𝔵. 𝔅𝔩𝔬𝔬𝔪, 𝔱𝔥𝔢 𝔇𝔯𝔞𝔤𝔬𝔫 𝔉𝔦𝔯𝔢 𝔉𝔞𝔦𝔯𝛾. 😀🤍🤍🤍🤍🍕🤍🤍🤍🤍😀

custom 544766352527722196214custom 54654786029444346965custom 54656150626453656035custom 52827918984261465922custom 54472135973881946092custom 54448849047750082391custom 54450819020399762871

31 Jul 2026, 18:26 UTC87 views28 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

С вас реакции, с меня пост!! (#щп)

custom 521765618105663832310custom 52174290846608583367custom 52176923446812683156custom 52176812894354496324custom 54656150626453656031

31 Jul 2026, 13:42 UTC90 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Ладно, сегодня отсниму (#щп)

custom 52176561810566383234custom 52154288067219645592custom 52174290846608583361

28 Jul 2026, 21:18 UTC116 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🎧🎧— Резкий, но в полне ожидаемый #косплан

custom 52174290846608583368custom 52154288067219645594custom 52176561810566383233custom 52175775101406743682

28 Jul 2026, 17:37 UTC335 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

☺️есколько фотографий со сцены!! 😀😀Фотограф:: золотой макне

custom 521765618105663832310custom 52154288067219645593custom 52175775101406743682custom 52178741205821371851

27 Jul 2026, 18:11 UTC99 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026

— Обновила фотографию!! Не теряем 💕 (#щп)

custom 52154288067219645598custom 52176561810566383232custom 52175775101406743681custom 52176008962376022551

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @ranvuui. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 727,743 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ℛ𝒶𝓃𝓋𝓊” (@ranvuui), 124 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ranvuui.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.