Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Randy Hillier Channel

Channel

Randy Hillier Channel

@randyhillier

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

2,327subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001260603895
TypeChannel
Username@randyhillier
Created4 March 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/randyhillier

Growth

2,3272,3332,3306 August 2026 — 2,333 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,333 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,331 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,330 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,327 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,326–2,334 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 16:282,327-3
10 Aug 2026, 12:132,330-1
7 Aug 2026, 04:552,331-2
6 Aug 2026, 11:182,333no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:512,333first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 December 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 10s
Average length
4m 10s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

427 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍21851.1%
10324.1%
🔥337.73%
👏327.49%
🤬194.45%
🤡112.58%
👎40.937%
🥴30.703%
🥰20.468%
🖕10.234%
🤔10.234%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 427reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 December 2024 to 8 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Feb 2025, 17:41 UTC≈3,040 views111 reactionsread 7 August 2026

WE NEED A DOGE, NOT A FORD On February 27th will you buy the corrupt broken down Ford, or will you choose a reliable, dependable and trustworthy replacement. Become a candidate contact me at [email protected] Become a member and help out at www.Ontarioparty.ca Lets TAKE BACK ONTARIO https://youtu.be/W2BbCi2zsgs

69🔥23👍19

7 Feb 2025, 13:41 UTC≈2,350 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/kPUwQrfDCEA WILL YOU TAKE BACK ONTARIO? Join us at the http://OntarioParty.ca to Take Back our once great province. We are actively recruiting candidates and volunteers to join us. Contact [email protected] to become part of a team dedicated to ensuring the future of all Ontarians and fighting against the destruction and devastation we have been experiencing through mass migration, homelessness

👍202

4 Feb 2025, 17:09 UTC≈1,860 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/Ke1y8K6P9Bs MAID in Ontario Made in Ontario doesn't mean what it used to in Ontario. @fordnation & @JustinTrudeau have MAID life a living H**L for people. On February 27th we can TAKE BACK ONTARIO with @TrueDerekSloan @TomMarazzo & @randyhillier Contact http://ontarioparty.ca Become a candidate contact info@randyhillier

👍11🤬4🥴32

4 Feb 2025, 00:13 UTC≈1,610 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

A Fork in road-which path will we take? On February 27th Canadians face a critical juncture-will we stay on the path of corruption and darkness, or will we choosea new path towards Hope Town. Join the www.OntarioParty.ca with @trueDerekSloan, @TomMarazzo and myself @randyhillier ​ TAKE BACK ONTARIO https://youtu.be/pvSuwKM8IDI

👍173

31 Jan 2025, 15:04 UTC≈1,600 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/S4ye9SrTFc0 Take Back Ontario! Corrupt political parties have ruled over us for too long. On February 27th 2025 we can end this cycle of corruption. Join with @RandyHillier , @TrueDereksSloan and join the http://Ontarioparty.ca to Take Back Ontario.

👏15👍73🔥2

27 Jan 2025, 14:33 UTC≈2,240 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

MAJOR Announcement- Hillier Joins Ontario party in senior leadership role Premier Ford and Prime Minister Trudeau are habitual and repeat offenders. On Sunday January 27th 2025 Derek Sloan, Leader of the Ontario Party announced that former MPP Randy Hillier has joined our leadership team as Co Campaign Chairman for the upcoming Ontario general election. Now, as we face another election, we have an opportunity to un

👍272🥰2👏1

19 Jan 2025, 21:04 UTC≈1,680 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

The Maple Leaf-is it being used as a false flag? Canada A user's guide and owners manual episode 11 Can we use referenda to fix our country with @PardyBruce , @wabbitwarrior & Marty Speyer What is obvious is that our Canadian political elite will defend and prioritize rampant and uncontrolled immigration that dilutes our Canadian heritage at the expense of Canadians economic well-being. Trump is fixing America a

🔥54👎2🤬2🖕1

16 Jan 2025, 20:02 UTC≈2,640 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/6qA_Pgl3abY?feature=share Those who have plundered Canada for decades, now call on us to rally around the flag.

👍14👏31

15 Jan 2025, 19:53 UTC≈1,040 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/1W6FZ8tqzu0 51 st State. We have been governed by Crooks & Carney's for too long Donald Trump wants to annex Canada - would this be good for Canadians? I'll be discussing this and Canada's current identity crisis with Greg Wycliffe tonight January 15th at 7pm EST LIVE LINK 👇👇 https://youtube.com/live/-Ay3ddq4Lbg?feature=share Also on X @randyhillier and Facebook @RandyHillier

👍81

13 Jan 2025, 21:09 UTC906 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/wwuvykaMxoQ 51st State Debate What is a Canadian-Should we become AmeriCans? X space hosted by @NML_Canada 8pm easten Monday January 13th

👏91

13 Jan 2025, 19:28 UTC725 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

I will be co-hosting an open X space tonight 51st State Debate. What is a Canadian-Should we be AmeriCans? Join the discussion and debate https://x.com/i/spaces/1BRJjwPbojexw

👍61

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @randyhillier. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 385,937 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Randy Hillier Channel” (@randyhillier), 2,327 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/randyhillier.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.