Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for RANDiranofficial

Channel

RANDiranofficial

@randiranofficial

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

198subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002130951817
TypeChannel
Username@randiranofficial
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 20 February 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded18 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/randiranofficial

Growth

19820019918 August 2026 — 200 subscribers18 August 2026 — 200 subscribers11 September 2026 — 198 subscribers18 August 202611 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 23 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 198–200 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 02:40198-2
18 Aug 2026, 22:00200no change
18 Aug 2026, 21:45200first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 February 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6h 15m
Average length
1h 33m

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

67 reactions across 12 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2334.3%
👍2334.3%
🙏1014.9%
👏34.48%
🔥34.48%
👌22.99%
👎22.99%
🤔11.49%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 67 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 February 2024 to 19 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 May 2025, 07:04 UTC291 views2 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Forwarded from @AcademyofPsychotherapy

مهارت‌های بین‌فردی تسهیل‌گر (Facilitative Interpersonal Skills - FIS) به مجموعه‌ای از توانایی‌های ارتباطی و رفتاری اساسی درمانگر اطلاق می‌شود که به تسهیل تغییرات مثبت در افرادی که دچار پریشانی هیجانی و روانشناختی هستند، کمک می‌کند. این مهارت‌ها از طریق ارزیابی پاسخ‌های درمانگر به موقعیت‌های درمانی واقع‌گرایانه و چالش‌برانگیز (که اغلب به صورت ویدئویی ارائه می‌شوند) سنجیده می‌شوند و بر اساس ابعادی کلیدی که به طور قوی

1👍1

25 Feb 2025, 07:22 UTC≈1,390 views7 reactionsread 18 August 2026

احمقانه، سطحی، غیراخلاقی! جنگ بی‌پایان مکاتب روان‌درمانی به‌رغم پیشرفت‌ها، عرصۀ روان‌درمانی همچنان میدان نبردی برای رقابت مکاتب نظری مختلف است. طرفداران هر رویکرد تلاش دارند برتری درمان خود را اثبات و دیگری را رد کنند که این امر مانعی جدی برای پیشرفت این عرصه و بهزیستی درمانجویان می‌شود. عنوان این نوشته برگرفته از مقاله‌ای با همین مضمون «احمقانه، سطحی، غیراخلاقی» است که البته منتشر نشد. پل واکتل، پیرو مکتب روان‌تحل

👍3👏2👌1👎1

13 Oct 2024, 08:41 UTC583 views3 reactionsread 18 August 2026
File

🎧پادکست ▫️نشست علمی با عنوان: «DSM: کارآمد یا ناکارآمد؟» ▫️با حضور: ▪️دکتر علی فیضی - روان‌درمانگر و مترجم ACT. «علم رفتاری بافتاری در چالش با الگوی زیستی‌پزشکی رنج انسان: DSM به چه کارمان می‌آید؟» ▪️علی حسین‌زاده اسکوئی- دانشجوی روان‌شناسی بالینی. «ضرورت تشخیص‌گذاری و استفاده از DSM: تمایز روان‌درمانگر و تکنیسین» ▪️دکتر محمد خالقی- روان‌درمانگر PBT، مترجم‌ کتاب فراسوی DSM. «نقش دیدگاه فرایندی در عصر پسا DSM در عر

3

12 Oct 2024, 16:15 UTC≈2,430 views12 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Video

🔻مشاهده‌ی نسخه ذخیره شده: ▫️نشست علمی با عنوان: «DSM: کارآمد یا ناکارآمد؟» ▫️با حضور: ▪️دکتر علی فیضی - روان‌درمانگر و مترجم ACT. «علم رفتاری بافتاری در چالش با الگوی زیستی‌پزشکی رنج انسان: DSM به چه کارمان می‌آید؟» ▪️علی حسین‌زاده اسکوئی- دانشجوی روان‌شناسی بالینی. «ضرورت تشخیص‌گذاری و استفاده از DSM: تمایز روان‌درمانگر و تکنیسین» ▪️دکتر محمد خالقی- روان‌درمانگر PBT، مترجم‌ کتاب فراسوی DSM. «نقش دیدگاه فرایندی در

7🙏5

2 Oct 2024, 16:09 UTC≈2,790 views7 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

نشست علمی با عنوان: «DSM: کارآمد یا ناکارآمد؟» با حضور: دکتر علی فیضی - روان‌درمانگر و مترجم ACT. «علم رفتاری بافتاری در چالش با الگوی زیستی‌پزشکی رنج انسان: DSM به چه کارمان می‌آید؟» علی حسین‌زاده اسکوئی- دانشجوی روان‌شناسی بالینی. «ضرورت تشخیص‌گذاری و استفاده از DSM: تمایز روان‌درمانگر و تکنیسین» دکتر محمد خالقی- روان‌درمانگر PBT، مترجم‌ کتاب فراسوی DSM. «نقش دیدگاه فرایندی در عصر پسا DSM در عرصۀ سلامت روان» ت

3🔥3👍1

2 Aug 2024, 21:38 UTC503 views5 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Forwarded from @PersianRFTVideo

🔻مشاهده وبینار ذخیره شده "تبیین ارزش‌ها در مداخله‌ی ACT جیسِن لوما" ▫️پلن اول ▪️تسهیلگر: دکتر علی فیضی (رواندرمانگر و مترجم ACT) ▪️تبیین مداخله‌ی ارزش‌ها از منظر درمان مبتنی بر پذیرش و تعهد (ACT) ▫️ پلن دوم ▪️تسهیلگر: حسین سعیدی (روان درمانگر، مدرس دانشگاه) ▪️تبیین مداخله‌ی ارزش‌ها از منظر نظریه چهارچوب ارتباطی (RFT) ▫️تبیین مبتنی بر ویدئو یکی از مداخلات آموزشی ACT توسط «Jason Luoma» میباشد (ترجمه‌ی مداخله و تب

🙏5

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @randiranofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“RANDiranofficial” (@randiranofficial), 198 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/randiranofficial.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.