2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 247–249 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Aug 2026, 09:03
248
no change
17 Aug 2026, 20:00
248
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
147.4%
avg views ÷ 248 subscribers
Avg views / post
366
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held
20 (30 June 2026 – 17 August 2026)
Views total
5,849
Reactions total
129
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
17 Aug 2026, 20:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
166 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
143
86.1%
👍
14
8.43%
😁
7
4.22%
👏
1
0.602%
😢
1
0.602%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 166reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
أني عندي حلول، بس ما تنفع وي كل الحالات.
كونا نعيش ببلد ثقافة الصحّة النفسيّة بي شبه معدومة، لدرجة إن الشخص الي ياخذ علاج يحس نفسه ديسوي شي مُخزي ويتكتّم ع الوضع.
لذلك أحتاج أسمع من أشخاص أكثر خبرة، أو ممكن تكون عدهم حلول مغايرة عن الحلول الي أفكّر بيها. وممكن إذا اضطريت أستعين ببعض الـpsychiatrists.
وحتّى الطلّاب المتدرّبين، إذا أكو أحد من ذوي الخبرة متواجد وياكم، اطرحوا عليه الموضوع ودزولي رأيه، يمكن تكون عنده و…
الموضوع بي شقّين:
قبل كلشي، الصيدلي ما لازم يتعامل إلا وي الوصفة، وتكون الوصفة قانونية.
الشق الأول: من أتشدّد وي المراجع بموضوع الوصفة، شلون ممكن أخليه ما يخاف من علاجه؟ خصوصاً إذا تشدّدي بالوصفة خلاه يحس أكو مشكلة بالعلاج أو يخاف من أخذه.
ثانياً: أكو مراجعين يبقون ع العلاج لفترات طويلة بدون لا يرجعون للطبيب، فيكون فعلاً تاريخ الوصفة قديم ومو جديد. وأكو منهم يضيّعون الوصفة، وهم فعلاً مستمرين ع العلاج.
هذولة شلون …
جاي التمس لَغط هواي ولَبس صاير ع أدوية الـCNS بسبب الـside effects مالتها، بحيث حتى المريض الفعلاً محتاج العلاج صار يخاف من يجي ياخذه، ومرات ما تگدر تميّز بين المريض المحتاجه فعلاً وبين الشخص الـaddicted.
والمريض الفعلاً محتاج للعلاج، من تشدّد بموضوع وجود الوصفة، يبقى هو هم يخاف من علاجه ويحس أكو خلل.
As a pharmacist
شلون تتعاملون وي هيچ وضع؟ شنو حلولكم؟ سواء حلول لحظيّة ممكن نتعامل بيها بالموقف نفسه، أو حلول ممكن…
"إذا تريد تصير صيدلي فاشل، أخذ وياك دفتر للصيدلية".
هيچ سمعت بريل مرّة، كان موجّه للمتدرّبين. بفترتها كنت صاعدة مرحلة خامسة، بعدني مُتدرّبة.
كتبتله بوقتها تعليق أستنكر فكرته، بس هو چان مُصرّ إنو الدفتر بس الصيدلي الفاشل ياخذه وياه. الموضوع يضحّك .
عندي نوت يحتوي على أهم العوائل للأدوية المزمنة، وأهم أسماء العلاجات البراند اللي الأدوية العلمية داتتسمّى بيها حتى بعد انقطاعها عن السوق، وأهم التداخلات الدوائية اللي نت…
أكثر شيء يدوّخ طالب الصيدلة هو: شلون يضبط الفارما؟ شلون يدرسها بالشكل الصحيح؟ وشلون يتمكن من فهم المادة بعمق، ويفهمها مثل ما المادة تريد؟
الجواب هنا وافي جدًا.
سواء كنت طالب مرحلة ثالثة أو رابعة، إذا فعلًا يهمك تفهم المادة وما تحب تجامل نفسك، وكنت جدي وياها، فاتبع هذي الطريقة.
هي متعبة حيل، وتحتاج وقت وجهد وصبر، لكن بالمقابل مثمرة جدًا.
الفيديو لدكتور عبد الحكيم، الي ما أتوقع أكو أحد شارح المادة بالطريقة الي ماشي…
إذا أكو فد شي إحنا نگدر نسويه، هو نحد من تسخيف المهنة، ونقلل من الأفكار الي گاعدين يبدعون بيها بعض المتصيدلين ع مواقع التواصل، ومسوّين المهنة عبالك سوق مخضّر متاح للجميع.
يحچون بأشياء ما المفروض ينحچـي بيها بهذي الطريقة، وصارت المهنة عبارة عن ترند وتقييمات.
كلامي موجه لزملائي المتخرجين بالجديد، واللي بعدهم يتدربون.
مستقبلًا من تشتغل، إذا تواجدت أي حالة تجيك متعرفلها، أو تحليل متعرف تقراه، أو وصفة، أو استشارة... گول: ما أعرف. كلش طبيعي، بس حاول تطور من نفسك بالموضوع اللي انسألت بيه فيما بعد.
أحسن من أن تفتي بشي إنت متعرف عنه.
أجاني مراجع اليوم، ضغط زوجته ديصفر . شفت كلشي يخص حالتها، هي مسوية Bilateral adrenalectomy، فالطبيب ممشيها على Hydrocortisone.
سألته: جاي تاخذ …
❤12👍3
Signed Ramlla
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ramllaworld22. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 360,009 of 1,566,395entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ph.ramlla ⚗️” (@ramllaworld22), 248 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ramllaworld22.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.