Channel
@ramakantmaharaj
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
120subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001825861001 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ramakantmaharaj |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ramakantmaharaj |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:57 | 120 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 121 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 121 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
35 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12 | 34.3% | |
| 👍 | 12 | 34.3% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 28.6% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 2.86% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 December 2024 to 17 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Domingo, 11 de Junio, 1978 Cuanto más comprenda la espiritualidad menor serán sus necesidades. Cuando el jiva muere significa que el sentido de “yo soy” cesa. Para comprender esto uno debe estabilizarse en su interior. Cualquier cosa por la que se tome a usted mismo acaba. La “yosoidad” que usted da por sentada no va a durar. La vigilia viene del sueño profundo, junto con la sensación “yo soy”. Cuando la mente es…
🔥4
Sunday, June 11, 1978 The more you understand about spirituality, the less will be your needs. When a jiva dies, it means the sense ‘I am’ ends. To understand this one should get stabilized within. Whatever you take yourself to be will come to an end. Tie ‘I am-ness’ that you have taken for granted will not last. Wakefulness came from deep sleep. Along with that came the feeling ‘I am’. When the mind is busy with d…
❤2👍1
Pregunta: Maharaj, si todo es ilusión, ¿por qué estamos aquí? ¿Por qué no podemos permanecer en el silencio o en el sueño profundo? Maharaj: Usted no comprende lo que es el sueño profundo. En el sueño profundo, no hay nada. Es Cero. ¿Por qué está usted aquí? Para comprender. Dejemos que todo acontezca pero sepamos que es nada. Debido a la ignorancia usted va a cero en el sueño profundo, pero aquí, en el estado d…
👍1🔥1
Question: Maharaj, if everything is illusion, why are we here? Why can't we remain in silence or in deep sleep? Maharaj: You don't understand what deep sleep is. In deep sleep, there is nothing. It is Zero. Why are you here? To understand. Let everything happen but let us know that it is nothing. Because of ignorance you go to zero in deep sleep, but here in the waking state you must first go to this zero point …
❤1
5 de Octubre de 1980 Maharaj: Yo no tengo ninguna individualidad. Yo no he asumido ninguna pose como una persona. Todo lo que acontece en la consciencia manifiesta, acontece. Las gentes me identifican con sus conceptos y hacen lo que sus conceptos les dicen. Es la consciencia lo que es manifiesto, nada más. ¿Quién está hablando, quién está caminando, quién está sentado? Todos éstos son las expresiones de esa quím…
👍2
October 5, 1980 Maharaj: I have no individuality. I have assumed no pose as a person. Whatever happens in the manifest consciousness, happens. People identify me with their concepts and they do what their concepts tell them. It is consciousness which is manifest, nothing else. Who is talking, who is walking, who is sitting? These are the expressions of that chemical "I Am". Are you that chemical? You talk about h…
👍1🙏1
P: Vamos a ver si lo entiendo, Maharaj. Lo primero es la meditación y el Conocimiento, luego la Convicción, que viene tanto de que el Maestro nos convence de la Realidad como del propio Auto-convencimiento. Esto es Convicción activa, porque trabajamos en ella para aceptar la Realidad. Tras la Convicción, que significa realmente saber que no somos el cuerpo, atravesamos un período de Absorción, que significa que todo …
Q: Let me see if I understand, Maharaj. First is meditation and Knowledge, then Conviction, which comes both from the Master convincing us of Reality and from Self-conviction itself. This is active Conviction, because we work on it to accept Reality. After Conviction, which means really knowing that we are not the body, we go through a period of Absorption, which means that all the Knowledge is absorbed into the body…
❤1
29 de Julio de 1980 Interlocutor: ¿Por qué surgió esta consciencia? Maharaj: Usted es a la vez la pregunta y la respuesta. Todas sus preguntas vienen de su identificación con el cuerpo. ¿Cómo pueden responderse las preguntas relativas a eso que es antes del cuerpo y de la consciencia? Hay yoguis que se han sentado en meditación durante muchos, muchos años buscando respuesta a esta pregunta, pero no la han comprendi…
👍2🔥1
July 29, 1980 Questioner: Why did this consciousness arise? Maharaj: You are both the question and the answer. All your questions come from your identification with the body. How can any questions relating to that which was prior to the body and consciousness be answered? There are yogis who have sat in meditation for many, many years seeking answers to this question, but even they haven't understood it. And yet yo…
❤2
Pregunta: Si un mendigo pide dinero a un ser realizado, ¿que hará? Maharaj: Es su elección si da o no da. Porque, después de todo, todo es una ilusión. Puede parecer inmisericorde hasta el punto de no dar agua a un hombre moribundo. Si un hombre está gimiendo «¡agua, agua!», no se la dará, porque el hombre va a morir de todos modos, y darle agua sólo prolongará su sufrimiento. Usted piensa que es bueno si da el ag…
👍2
Question: If a beggar asks a realized being for money, what will he do? Maharaj: It is his choice whether he gives or not. Because, after all, it is all an illusion. You may appear merciless to the extent of not giving water to a dying man. If a man is moaning, “Water, water!” you will not give it to him, because the man is going to die anyway, and giving him water will only prolong his suffering. You think it is …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ramakantmaharaj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,371,871 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ramakant Maharaj 🏵 Inchegiri Navnath Masters of Reality ॐ” (@ramakantmaharaj), 120 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ramakantmaharaj.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.