Channel
@raldugina_space
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
139subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002617845684 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @raldugina_space |
| Description | О сервисе, маркетинге и людях — без глянца. Разбираю проекты, переговоры и клиентский опыт. Основатель Housekeeping Stars Awards, автор «Поговорим начистоту», ведущая бизнес-игр. Сотрудничество: @annet_raldugina |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/raldugina_space |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:00 | 139 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 139 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 11 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (11 June 2026 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 510 |
| Reactions total | 17 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 19:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
75 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 28 | 37.3% | |
| 🔥 | 28 | 37.3% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 12.0% | |
| 💯 | 8 | 10.7% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 1.33% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @raldugina_space. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 June 2026 to 31 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Пошла учиться управлению. На первой же ступени, разбирая свои действующие проекты, рычаги, цели, ценности, АВС и SMART, получила от преподавателя охрененный вопрос: — Ну написали вы всё хорошо и правильно, но… А вам лично это зачем? И правда: нахера я всё это делаю, если постоянно всем должна, вкладываю свои деньги, отвечаю за всех, а сама живу хуже? Похоже, новый виток самокопания обеспечен. Поздравляем! Вы пер…
🔥2
Ну что, как говорится я газую когда нету, газую когда есть все , везёт тому кто везёт😉 Зашла в отраслевой чат и завтра первый консультационный день со мной. Присоединяйтесь https://t.me/hoteliersclub 🔥 Завтра пройдет #Деньконсультации с экспертом. С нами будет Анна Ралдугина — эксперт-практик по клинингу с опытом более 15 лет, основатель и организатор международной отраслевой премии Housekeeping Stars Awards («З…
👍1🔥1
Я несколько лет строила премию как приход. А надо было — как бизнес Я дочитала книгу Максима Яковенко «Как создать событие» и прошла первые три супервизии по Housekeeping Stars Awards. Впереди у нас ещё пять созвонов, но главный диагноз уже понятен: я много лет была в своём проекте тем самым пастырем, который всем помогает, всех поддерживает и почти всё делает бесплатно. Мне хотелось развивать отрасль. Давать людя…
❤3
Posted without readable text
Сегодня я решила никуда не ехать. Хотя билет куплен. Хотя деньги уже заплачены. Хотя внутри сразу включается это привычное: «Ну давай, соберись, ты же можешь». Могу. Могу накраситься, помыть голову, час ехать через весь город, вернуться поздно вечером, потом ещё гулять с собакой и завтра встать на тренировку. Вопрос только — зачем? Сегодня я уже была на мастер-классе, лепила тарелку для Арчи. Голова болит, я ещё…
❤5💯4🔥1
Что не день, то новости Ещё один обязательный 💸 платёж для бизнеса? Госдума приняла закон: для ИП и организаций появятся электронные 📬 почтовые ящики на Госуслугах. Через них будут приходить официальные уведомления от госорганов. Для физлиц — бесплатно. А вот для бизнеса — планируется ежемесячная плата. Не оплатил — доступ могут приостановить. А значит, можно пропустить важное уведомление, штраф, требование или …
📖Про книгу, супервизию и переупаковку проекта Продолжу историю про случайное мероприятие «Клуб Строителей». После знакомства с Максимом Яковенко я пришла домой и, как нормальный человек с лёгкой профессиональной деформацией, начала его изучать. Нашла сайт, посмотрела проекты и поняла, что Максим — не просто организатор мероприятий. У него огромный опыт в event-индустрии: крупные деловые проекты, Росконгресс, Восто…
🔥7👍1🥰1
В прошлый четверг мне в Instagram* попалась реклама мероприятия «Клуб Строителей». Казалось бы: где я — и где строители?🤔 Но я посмотрела программу и поняла: с точки зрения моей работы с Ассоциацией русских уборочных компаний это может быть очень полезно. Осенью у нас впереди несколько деловых сессий, и мне важно находить не просто «спикеров ради спикеров», а людей, которые реально связаны с проектированием, девел…
💯4👍2
Хотели хайпа — получили репутационный пожар 🙅Разберу сегодня один кейс из серии: как нельзя делать маркетинг. Никогда. Есть бренд Clean Formula — средства для уборки, бытовая химия, клининг-тематика. Ниша, где можно делать классный контент: показывать продукт, результат, «до/после», сложные загрязнения, лайфхаки, честные тесты, коллаборации с блогерами. Но бренд, судя по ситуации, выбрал другой путь. Они взяли рил…
👍2💔1
Сегодня моему сыну 21.🥳 И я всё ещё пытаюсь понять, в какой момент маленький мальчик превратился во взрослого мужчину, рядом с которым нас иногда уже путают — то ли сын, то ли не сын. Жизнь, конечно, умеет подкидывать смешные спецэффекты. В 2007 году я приехала в Москву, если честно, не очень понимая, зачем, куда и как всё будет дальше. Просто было ощущение, что надо ехать. Через полтора года я забрала его — и нача…
❤14
Друзья, мне нужна ваша поддержка 🤍 Вас здесь 135 человек. Да, это не стадион, но я почему-то очень верю в силу маленьких, но живых сообществ. Я выложила в нельзяграм рилс с Sea Breeze Resort. Для меня это не просто видео — за ним стоит большая идея: сервисная академия на базе Sea Breeze, развитие housekeeping в Азербайджане и продолжение проекта Housekeeping Stars Awards. Я уже 4 года наблюдаю, как растёт housekee…
🔥6👍2
Наконец-то делюсь конференцией, которую мы организовали в Вологде совместно с Вологодской региональной общественной организацией «Ассоциация специалистов сестринского дела». 9 июня прошла региональная научно-практическая конференция «Инфекционная безопасность и санитарное содержание медицинской организации: современные решения и практика». В конференции приняли участие более 100 специалистов сестринского дела из ра…
❤3🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @raldugina_space. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 295,600 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@raldugina_space named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Анна Ралдугина| Про сервис и людей” (@raldugina_space), 139 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/raldugina_space.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.