Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

' Rᥲy𐌺ᥱᴛr ᥴ᧐ᥒfᥱssi᧐ᥒ.💤

@raketarrll

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

108subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002247702647
TypeChannel
Username@raketarrll
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/raketarrll

Growth

1089 Aug 2026, 06:46 — 108 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 08:03 — 108 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 06:469 Aug 2026, 08:03
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 107–109 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 08:03108no change
9 Aug 2026, 06:46108first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 14 November 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
83
Videos
32
Links
13

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
53s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

365 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥12634.5%
❤‍🔥7219.7%
💘5615.3%
🥰4813.2%
💋3810.4%
💊92.47%
🍓41.10%
🎅41.10%
🐳30.822%
👾20.548%
🕊20.548%
🤔10.274%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 365reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 14 November 2024 to 14 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Feb 2025, 12:40 UTC274 views23 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Ну.. А в чем она не права? Тгк: @hssuy_trew #тейк.

💘16🔥4❤‍🔥3

Signed 𝓢 𝘩𝘳𝘪𝘱𝘢 𝓣 𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘺𝘶𝘯𝘰𝘷.

19 Jan 2025, 10:29 UTC379 views27 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Здравствуйте...... Ну пока! Тгк: @hssuy_trew #тейк.

🥰15💋5🔥3❤‍🔥2💘2

Signed 𝓢 𝘩𝘳𝘪𝘱𝘢. #𝘐𝘓𝘶𝘷𝘔𝘺𝘉𝘧.

19 Jan 2025, 10:28 UTC284 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Ракетры+ Ивк (и 1, и 2 сезон) Тгк: @hssuy_trew #тейк.

💋13❤‍🔥1🔥1

Signed 𝓢 𝘩𝘳𝘪𝘱𝘢. #𝘐𝘓𝘶𝘷𝘔𝘺𝘉𝘧.

7 Jan 2025, 10:47 UTC322 views22 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

чета актива в кф нет.. Ну вот вам мой эдит🌀🌀,помню как летом кидал свои эдиты сюда неанон арбузек #тейк.

🔥13💘3🥰3❤‍🔥1💊1💋1

Signed 𝓢 𝘩𝘳𝘪𝘱𝘢.#𝖨𝖫𝗎𝗏𝖬𝗒𝖠𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗈𐙚

2 Jan 2025, 19:31 UTC315 views22 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

хорошенькие маргоша🐴 #тейк.

🔥12❤‍🔥6💋2🥰2

Signed 𝓢 𝘩𝘳𝘪𝘱𝘢.#𝖨𝖫𝗎𝗏𝖬𝗒𝖠𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗈𐙚

2 Jan 2025, 10:10 UTC309 views31 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Новый год , новый год Тгк: @hssuy_trew #тейк.

❤‍🔥21🔥5🐳3💊1💘1

Signed 𝓢 𝘩𝘳𝘪𝘱𝘢.#𝖨𝖫𝗎𝗏𝖬𝗒𝖠𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗈𐙚

1 Jan 2025, 10:23 UTC267 views29 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

твкв:засосы. Чуть-чуть скетчей с любимками вам НУПОТОМУЧТООНИТАКИЕНЯНЯНЛЮБЛЮИХ Тгк: @hssuy_trew #тейк.

🔥21❤‍🔥4💘3💊1

Signed 𝓢 𝘩𝘳𝘪𝘱𝘢.#𝖨𝖫𝗎𝗏𝖬𝗒𝖠𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗈𐙚

20 Dec 2024, 03:54 UTC334 views27 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

мяумяумяумяяууу cr @weiuh #тейк.

💘22🎅3❤‍🔥1💊1

Signed ᅠ𝗌𝗁𝗋𝗂𝗉𝖺.𐙚

20 Dec 2024, 03:38 UTC346 views33 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Я листал конфу и нашёл свой старые тейк и скетч, так что.. || Райя ниже Окетры на 7 сантиметров ||Они любят меняться одеждой ||Окетра постоянно пытается нацепить на Райю своих украшений ||У Райи куча серёжек которые она почти не носит, их все подарила Окетра (Воу, это же мой старый хед) Ракеты правят миром Неанос, Сай #тейк.

🔥18❤‍🔥5🥰5💘3🎅1🤔1

Signed ᅠ𝗌𝗁𝗋𝗂𝗉𝖺.𐙚

8 Dec 2024, 11:25 UTC480 views20 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Здравствуйте! Написала фф по любимым ракетрам, стыд прошёл, кидаю вам https://ficbook.net/readfic/01935c84-9b08-7af8-ad01-b3baadb5afa7 #тейк .

🔥12🥰3❤‍🔥2💘2💊1

Signed @Laney.#𝖱𝖾𝗇ē𝖪𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗋.𐙚

5 Dec 2024, 08:49 UTC517 views30 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

мамы любимейшие🙏🙏 @nek0lya <- мой тгк♡ @raketarrll | #тейк .

🥰18💋6❤‍🔥2🔥2🍓1💊1

Signed @Laney.#𝖱𝖾𝗇ē𝖪𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗋.𐙚

30 Nov 2024, 14:56 UTC425 views27 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Old art Othiri_nu_or_you_who @raketarrll | #тейк .

❤‍🔥17🔥7🥰2💊1

Signed @Laney.#𝖱𝖾𝗇ē𝖪𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗋.𐙚

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @raketarrll. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,116,809 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“' Rᥲy𐌺ᥱᴛr ᥴ᧐ᥒfᥱssi᧐ᥒ.💤” (@raketarrll), 108 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/raketarrll.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.