Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ✨Rakel Eneliss✨

Channel

✨Rakel Eneliss✨

@rakel_eneliss

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

877subscribers

+47 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002551334635
TypeChannel
Username@rakel_eneliss
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/rakel_eneliss

Growth

830877853.56 August 2026 — 830 subscribers6 August 2026 — 830 subscribers6 August 2026 — 843 subscribers12 August 2026 — 877 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +47. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 823–884 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 19:14877+34
6 Aug 2026, 20:21843+13
6 Aug 2026, 15:16830no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:04830first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
41.7%
avg views ÷ 877 subscribers
Avg views / post
366
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held11 (14 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total3,293
Reactions total427
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

528 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥19637.1%
custom 537300913817757425217132.4%
custom 527406330940493022315729.7%
😱30.568%
🤩10.189%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 528reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 11 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rakel_eneliss. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 10:33 UTC178 views37 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Парная свопка с Your August! Она будет моей помощницей на Фурмаркете и принесёт немного своего мерча 💕 Pairs swap with Your August! She will be my assistant at the Furmarket and will bring some of her merch 💕

🔥22custom 53730091381775742528custom 52740633094049302236🤩1

5 Aug 2026, 10:41 UTC222 views48 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ответка для Silvary. Мне нравится водная тематика. Арт очень классный получился! Revenge to Silvary. I like the water theme. The art turned out very cool!

🔥31custom 53730091381775742529custom 52740633094049302238

3 Aug 2026, 12:42 UTC294 views44 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ответная атака на Ириску! Артфайт уже всё а я ещё не запостила некоторые работы 😅 Return attack on Iriska! Artfight is over and I haven’t posted some of my works yet 😅

custom 537300913817757425226custom 527406330940493022312🔥6

2 Aug 2026, 08:03 UTC394 views28 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @furr_marketPhoto

💫Rakel Eneliss💫 спешит сказать: «Хотите бесплатный значок? Найдите на моём столе 5 наклеек в форме звёзд и получите один значок из старой коллекции 💕 В этот раз ещё больше мерча — магнитики на холодильник, коврик для мыши, дакимакура и ремувка! Помимо этого, я уважаю классику: свопки, стикерпаки, штучные стикеры, гача-брелки по Балто и Котам-Воителям, значки! Каждого буду ждать с распростёртыми объятиями и конфеткам

🔥18custom 53730091381775742527custom 52740633094049302233

1 Aug 2026, 12:21 UTC357 views59 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ответный огонь на Белку! Revenge for the Belka!

custom 527406330940493022334custom 537300913817757425217🔥8

30 Jul 2026, 07:33 UTC456 views68 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

Мой рай выглядит вот так: *Изображение носит демонстративный характер, в комплект входит только одна подушка без меня самой🙏. Чистый Ракельсодержащий продукт! Заказать дакимакуру можно за 600р написав @rakeleneliss

custom 527406330940493022343🔥12custom 537300913817757425212😱1

29 Jul 2026, 10:42 UTC502 views43 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ответный огонь на @ananaspsinaart !! Return fire on @ananaspsinaart!!

custom 537300913817757425229🔥7custom 52740633094049302237

28 Jul 2026, 11:42 UTC445 views51 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Трейд с Viluri! 🦄 Интересно, почему он засмущался? trade with Viluri! 🦄 I wonder why he is embarrassed?

custom 527406330940493022335🔥10custom 53730091381775742526

27 Jul 2026, 10:42 UTC445 views49 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Сквозь врагов, пепел и дым несёт истину 📖 Through enemies, ashes and smoke he carries the truth 📖

🔥35custom 52740633094049302239custom 53730091381775742525

14 Jul 2026, 16:11 UTC946 views40 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Самые вкусные картинки за последнее время! Буду рада репостам и новеньким мордашкам✨ Мои соцсети и прайс (коммишки по слотам) https://sites.google.com/view/rakel-eneliss/price-and-tos The most delicious pictures in recent times! I will be glad for reposts and new faces ✨ My social networks and price list (slot commissions) https://sites.google.com/view/rakel-eneliss/price-and-tos #PortfolioDay

🔥34custom 53730091381775742524😱2

14 Jul 2026, 12:21 UTC597 views61 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Армия стесняшек! 🥺 🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺 An army of shy people! 🥺

custom 537300913817757425248🔥13

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @rakel_eneliss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 95,045 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“✨Rakel Eneliss✨” (@rakel_eneliss), 877 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rakel_eneliss.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.