lo smua hrs liat 😭
Signed raka gabriel @RKGBRIEL

Channel
@rakalifee
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
50subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 26 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001329206451 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rakalifee |
| Description | Connection : @RKGBRIELL_bot Board,Participation, Poll, Fi, Desk,dll : @simpananraka2 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 26 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rakalifee |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:30 | 50 | no change |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 50 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 December 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 August 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
lo smua hrs liat 😭
Signed raka gabriel @RKGBRIEL
[16/8 13.06] Ibu Jaya: Hay... [16/8 13.06] Ibu Jaya: Lg ngapain tuh! [16/8 13.06] gua: hai tante, saya lagi tiduran aja nih. ada apa yaa [16/8 13.07] Ibu Jaya: Heheheh Cm iseng aja [16/8 13.07] Ibu Jaya: Sdh makan blom? [16/8 13.07] Ibu Jaya: Itu foto km? [16/8 13.07] Ibu Jaya: Kok beda ya sm aslinya [16/8 13.08] gua: udah tante, aman [16/8 13.08] gua: emg yg asli kenapa wkwk [16/8 13.08] gua: iya bener, itu pas ngam…
Signed raka gabriel @RKGBRIEL
gua mau cerita, ini ngakak anjirt. jadi ibunya temen gua kan minta nomer wa gua, katanya biar bs ngasih tau gua klo ada loker. yaudah gua kasih. eh tb2 td ngechat gua anjing. nanyain kabar, udh makan apa blm, sm blg pp gua di wa cakepan aslinya langsung. trs gua gaboleh blg anaknya klo gua sm ibunya ini chatan kek gni. jd mkstnya gmn yh? fyi ini ibunya janda. plish lah ya, org2 kenapasih😭
Signed raka gabriel @RKGBRIEL
📝 lama ga dikasih Secret Message wkwk. ayo, don't be happy sm bc ya 👤 yg baru @IMJSPRK 👤 id tele lu yg baru apaan rak 👤 kangen raka, ada yang tau id barunya? 👤 . 👤 akun gua udh kga aktif sob, gegara hp gua ilang. jd free unsub -RAKA GABRIEL 👤 woy rak, akun lo masih aktif ga 👤 kak raka, kangen 👤 noona imu 👤 miss u 👤 lo kok gemes bgt?? 👤 Buat moots/fambest kak Raka, liat comment di bbc terakhir dia di ch ini…
Signed raka gabriel @RKGBRIEL
• • • •
Signed raka gabriel @RKGBRIEL
circle rprl since Maret 2021. rea si cwe lugu, bertemu dengan dua org lelaki. raka dan ari yg setengah somplak. @RKGBRIEL . @ileenakk0 . @pejuanqg
Signed raka gabriel @RKGBRIEL
dengerin deh, cocok buat tukang galau kek kalian wkwk
Signed raka gabriel @RKGBRIEL
collab with beautiful women @RKGBRIEL x @swohees . @yjiminee . @iBaexjohyun
Signed raka gabriel @RKGBRIEL
#Si Paling Kece
Signed raka gabriel @RKGBRIEL
I always wished everything was okay.
Signed raka gabriel @RKGBRIEL
< 3
Signed raka gabriel @RKGBRIEL
I love you very sincerely. I mean too much for this, seriously.
Signed raka gabriel @RKGBRIEL
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rakalifee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
wdyt about Raka Gabriel?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 December 2021 to 16 August 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“- R” (@rakalifee), 50 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rakalifee.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.