📊 Since January 2025, the cryptocurrency has shown the worst dynamics among the largest assets.

Channel
RAISER LAUNCHPAD
@raisernetwork
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
13subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001690108586 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @raisernetwork |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/raisernetwork |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 13 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:55 | 13 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 9.83%
- avg views ÷ 13 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1.3
- 18 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 18
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (12 July 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 23 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 02:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 343
- Videos
- 98
- Links
- 110
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 59s
- Average length
- 20s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Musk has lost nearly $513 billion over the past 53 days. That's almost as much as the combined wealth of Larry Page and Jeff Bezos.
🇷🇺 Putin signs Russia's first comprehensive law on cryptocurrencies, which legalizes regulated trading from September 1.
🤖 Michael Saylor stated, What Chat GPT helped Strategy create a new financial instrument and raise about $15 billion for the purchase of Bitcoin Document Title His main advice for the AI era is not to compete with robots in routine work, but to use them to create products and solutions that did not exist before.
💎 Central banks are aggressively buying gold again, in the second quarter they added 289 tons to reserves - the maximum since the end of 2024. Poland became the main buyer 🇵🇱
☠️ As a result of the Coldcard wallet vulnerability, kidnapped BTC for $38,000,000 from 500 addresses.
🗽 American public companies hold 1,240,000 BTC - almost 93% of all corporate bitcoin reserves in the world. Over the past year they bought another 510,000 BTC - more than three times more than the miners managed to extract during the same period.
💵 Exactly 16 years ago Satoshi Nakamoto wrote on the Bitcoin Talk forum, a phrase that has become a cult: If you don't believe me or don't understand, I don't have time to convince you, I'm sorry.
🪙 Binance stated, What youth have already become its main audience in trading stocks and other traditional assets - on generation Z falls before 45% of users of these products Document Title
The mechanism of operation of a crypto exchange, clearly 😁
🪒 2 years into Trump's second term earned more, than in the previous 60 years, although he refused the presidential salary. The main sources were crypt, personal shit, Trump Media and sale of licenses in his name.
🇷🇺 Russia entered the top 10 in terms of the number of new dollar millionaires. Over the past year, 22 thousand of them appeared in the country. This is more than in China, despite a tenfold difference in population.
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @raisernetwork. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 983,480 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RAISER LAUNCHPAD” (@raisernetwork), 13 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/raisernetwork.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.