Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

❗ЗАМОРОЗКА❗ 𝙍𝘼𝙄𝙉𝙔𝙁𝙊𝙍𝙀𝙎𝙏 ((💧))

@rain_y_forest

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

58subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001961892190
TypeChannel
Username@rain_y_forest
DescriptionДобро пожаловать в 𝙍𝘼𝙄𝙉𝙔𝙁𝙊𝙍𝙀𝙎𝙏. Владелец — @ANANASEX Благодарим студию @LYSSTUD за оформление.
Created24 March 2023measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/rain_y_forest

Growth

588 August 2026 — 58 subscribers10 August 2026 — 58 subscribers8 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 57–59 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 06:1558no change
8 Aug 2026, 07:4758first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 24 March 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 February 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
9
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

23 reactions across 7 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
834.8%
🍓417.4%
💋313.0%
🔥313.0%
❤‍🔥14.35%
👾14.35%
💘14.35%
🕊14.35%
🥰14.35%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 24 March 2023 to 27 February 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Feb 2024, 18:20 UTC≈1,500 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

🍓1

Signed 🍍

27 Feb 2024, 18:16 UTC≈1,290 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Люди, которые не предупреждают о том, что все таки разорвали союз, я с вами не буду больше заключать его. Если бы я не следил за теми, кто отписывается, я бы даже не узнал о разрыве. Идите на хуц. Именно с вами союз не будет подлежать перезаключению не только со мной, но и с другими админами

2🍓1

Signed 🍍

23 Jan 2024, 23:25 UTC≈1,190 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Я не знаю, всем или не всем я в лс прислал. Но в любом случае у вас должен быть включен наш бот. А я кидал туда соо

1

Signed 🍍

23 Jan 2024, 23:11 UTC≈1,270 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Ну что ж.. Видимо пришло и наше время. Как вы могли заметить, почти вся администрация у меня ушла, меня толком нет на ваших каналах, а постов на актив у нас и подавно.. Я долго пытался с этим побороться, пытался вернуться в прежнее состояние, но я больше не чувствую той тяги к союзам и занятию кланом в принципе. Как бы грустно это не звучало, но вы, наверное, уже и сами все поняли. Я больше не могу тянуть то, что ска

1

Signed 🍍

24 Oct 2023, 18:36 UTC859 viewsread 10 August 2026

#RNFST𝗥𝗣 для союзников (не рп)

Signed 🍍

24 Oct 2023, 18:32 UTC652 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

✨𝗢𝘄𝗻𝗲𝗿:: @jnxkion (союзы, нью и все любые вопросы к нему) ✨𝗔𝗱𝗺𝗶𝗻𝘀 𝗯𝘆 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝗼𝗻:: @jnxkion ✨𝗡𝗲𝘄 𝗮𝗱𝗺𝗶𝗻𝘀:: ✨𝗖𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗮𝗱𝗺𝗶𝗻𝘀::

🔥1

Signed 🍍

24 Oct 2023, 18:31 UTC561 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🤍🤍🤍🤍 OUR FAMILY 🤍🤍🤍🤍 ✨𝗛𝗨𝗦𝗕𝗔𝗡𝗗:: ✨𝗞𝗜𝗗𝗦:: ✨𝗚𝗥𝗔𝗡𝗗𝗣𝗔:: ✨𝗕𝗥𝗢𝗧𝗛𝗘𝗥𝗦:: ✨𝗦𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗘𝗥𝗦:: ✨𝗚𝗥𝗔𝗡𝗗𝗦𝗢𝗡𝗦:: ✨𝗡𝗘𝗣𝗛𝗘𝗪𝗦:: ✨𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗦:: ✨𝗙𝗥𝗜𝗘𝗡𝗗𝗦:: ✨𝗨𝗡𝗖𝗟𝗘𝗦:: ✨𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗟𝗢𝗥𝗗::

Signed 🍍

24 Oct 2023, 18:31 UTC619 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

━━━━━━━━ 💙 ━━━━━━━━ ⏤‌ВСЯ СЕМЬЯ ⏤@soul_reav ━━━━━━━━ 💙 ━━━━━━━━ ➡️Список будет пополняться. ➡️Порядок не имеет значения!

3🍓2💋2❤‍🔥1👾1💘1

Signed 🍍

24 Oct 2023, 18:30 UTC621 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🤍🤍🤍 𝗞𝗜𝗢𝗡'𝗦 𝗨𝗡𝗜𝗢𝗡 🤍🤍🤍 ➡️Союз лист в комментариях ➡️Просьба не писать туда ничего

Signed 🍍

24 Oct 2023, 18:30 UTC744 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🤍🤍🤍 𝗨𝗡𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗥𝗨𝗟𝗘𝗦 🤍🤍🤍 ➡️Правила в комментариях ➡️Просьба не писать туда ничего

Signed 🍍

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @rain_y_forest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 828,636 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“❗ЗАМОРОЗКА❗ 𝙍𝘼𝙄𝙉𝙔𝙁𝙊𝙍𝙀𝙎𝙏 ((💧))” (@rain_y_forest), 58 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rain_y_forest.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.