Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Крутые печки Райджу

@raijusou

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

49subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002437128951
TypeChannel
Username@raijusou
DescriptionСамый крисиви1 и обоятелний художник Мои другие соц сети: Tik Tok- @lamanet.row Тойхаус: https://toyhou.se/Raijuso Твиттер- @raijusou Трейды можно и коллабы, по возможности, МИПЛА НЕ РИСУЮ!!!
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/raijusou

Growth

496 August 2026 — 49 subscribers10 August 2026 — 49 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 48–50 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 12:0149no change
6 Aug 2026, 15:2449first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
129.9%
avg views ÷ 49 subscribers
Avg views / post
63.6
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held20 (10 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total891
Reactions total101
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
245
Videos
12
Links
41

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
29s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

153 reactions across 18 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3925.5%
❤‍🔥2214.4%
custom 52693523874111979362113.7%
🔥1610.5%
custom 5345824602239016465159.80%
🥰159.80%
custom 540690904016699481595.88%
🐳63.92%
👍31.96%
🍌21.31%
💔21.31%
😍21.31%
😘10.654%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 153reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @raijusou. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 20:55 UTC15 viewsread 10 August 2026
Video

Когда купила промоут в тик токе, а он работает(удивительно, 3 доллара окупаются пока ток лайками, хоть я нацеливалась на переходы по профилю https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS4tLNUTQ/

8 Aug 2026, 10:52 UTC57 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Забыла запостить Осталась одна коммишка бебеб

3🔥1custom 52693523874111979361

7 Aug 2026, 18:19 UTC27 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Ебучие покемоны.. Второй из четырех✌️✌️(пятый отменил((слава богу)) Мне уже пох заказчик попросит правки не, высталаляю поьому что хочу эм

3👍2custom 52693523874111979361custom 54069090401669948151

7 Aug 2026, 10:54 UTC28 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Нсфв Первая из 5 коммишек сделана💪💪

4🔥2🥰2custom 54069090401669948152

2 Aug 2026, 22:26 UTC59 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Надеюсь мои щп хоть кто то смотрит это оч важно Я ЩАС КОПЛЮ НА ЭКРАННИК ЭТО УЖАС, Я НАДЕЯЛАСЬ СКИДКА ДОЛЬШЕ БУДЕТ В общем, кому не сложно, пожалуйста подпишитесь на этот акк пожалуйста https://draw.market/Raiju , оч оперативно ищу сайты для продажи коммишек, уже везде где только можно пытаюсь деньги залутать потому что с учётом того, то я закрываю этим деньгами еще саморазвитие- становится сложнее, а значит нужно раб

❤‍🔥1

2 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC60 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Ахренет нас писят Спасибо большое ребятки, я очень вас люблю, даже такая, казалось бы, скромная циферка-для меня очень важна🥹💘 В скором времени постараюсь вернуться к регулярному постигну, завалилась коммишками, пока что не могу нормально рисовать для себя, только скетчи😭😭

1❤‍🔥1🔥1custom 52693523874111979361

2 Aug 2026, 10:08 UTC95 views16 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Создан чтоб смотреть на сиськи Коллаборация с моей любимой подружечкой томманичкой, как всегда собираемся полгода💪💪 (Моя часть Тара)

8custom 52693523874111979364custom 53458246022390164653❤‍🔥1

30 Jul 2026, 16:57 UTC96 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Ребяят потыкайте пожалуйста пост🥹🥹, оч нужна помощь чтобы получить верификацию от вгена, уже 5 подписчиков, это конечно даже не половина из требований для получения галочки, но уже что то!! https://x.com/i/status/2082590458794901724

❤‍🔥1

30 Jul 2026, 15:52 UTC76 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @Nyrsha666Photo

Ох уж эти ребята Устроили небольшой коллаб, ейпе! Кого я рисовала очевидно, ну и также на мне стоял фон Гляньте какие все крутые! Сэцуко @mor44ay Рэнни: @nerp2011 Ниан: 🙂‍↕️ Мари: @adelanana Нион: @ks5iol36791 Усако: @raijusou Черный брезгливый: @mory1a_mor Венди и Себастьян: @msrinza Краб: @msrinza Николь: @xzzzzzzzgdeia Ниен и Кокоро: @kokoro_zizoo Через месяц вы все умрёте #арт #коллаб

custom 526935238741119793632custom 53458246022390164652❤‍🔥1

28 Jul 2026, 22:24 UTC80 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Неужели эта стерва соизволила поменять аву боже Хз, просто внезапный прилив вдохновения и желание поставить везде одну аву Когда нибудь я возьмусь за развитие этого канала

🐳6custom 53458246022390164654custom 52693523874111979363

28 Jul 2026, 11:25 UTC74 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Гифт для моего любимого заказчика В меня 3 заказа рисуются, скоро будут обновы 👍👍

❤‍🔥21😘1custom 52693523874111979361

27 Jul 2026, 14:22 UTC75 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Вчера с томманичкой и её подписчиками играли в пони таун, поэтому решила нарисовать своего ос в виде поняшки

4🔥2custom 52693523874111979362❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @raijusou. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 251,659 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Крутые печки Райджу” (@raijusou), 49 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/raijusou.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.