Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Fed MacKenzie & Mi'kmaq Morgan feat. The Goof Patrol and Pride Boys

Channel

Fed MacKenzie & Mi'kmaq Morgan feat. The Goof Patrol and Pride Boys

@ragingdissidentiii

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

147subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002414662104
TypeChannel
Username@ragingdissidentiii
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ragingdissidentiii

Growth

147148147.57 August 2026 — 148 subscribers8 August 2026 — 148 subscribers15 August 2026 — 147 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 147–148 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 02:37147-1
8 Aug 2026, 20:16148no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:37148first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 10 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.8%
avg views ÷ 147 subscribers
Avg views / post
35.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held16 (10 January 202629 July 2026)
Views total35
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 20:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 40s
Average length
50s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 18:43 UTC35 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @WhiteCanada1Photo

Both pics have surfaced in the past week, Enough said. If you want to join the only ideologically Pro-White group in Canada, join the Nationalist-13 Vanguard: [email protected]

3 Apr 2026, 16:24 UTC167 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Canada’s Deep State Double Take: Heritage Front vs Second Sons How a spy helped build a white nationalist movement — and how the same script is playing out again. We’ll compare: 🕵️‍♂️ Grant Bristow, aka Donald Best the covert CSIS asset inside the Heritage Front vs. 🪖 Jeremy Mackenzie, leader of the Second Sons of Canada Are we watching nationalism, or are we watching an updated script? Join us as we break down:

3 Apr 2026, 16:24 UTC128 viewsread 8 August 2026

CanuckLaw has put an incredible amount of time into breaking down how Diagolon / SSC is a fedop! Def worth watching & sharing! https://youtu.be/OCMyuU6Qygw?si=kPoaJY_lYDrZGMjg

3 Apr 2026, 03:38 UTC135 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Imagine suing a jew because he speculated that you were a fed, only to have the judge side with the jew, and dismiss your case while awarding the jew $5700 in restitution. Tell me again how Jeremy isn't a federal informant, all of his supporters are now guilty by association and are rats by proxy. - Total Anon Victory

2 Apr 2026, 20:54 UTC99 viewsread 8 August 2026

Here's the entire testimony of Jeremy Mackenzie in regard to the federal inquiry into the Emergencies Act invocation: https://www.youtube.com/live/72WlY30tr-o?si=_IHnO8XjdA6YBTXY&t=16860 Here's the exact moment he admits to ratting on other groups and states he would be more than willing to assist the police in the future: https://www.youtube.com/live/72WlY30tr-o?si=chVknBSGKN8h5Uxj&t=24071 Which resulted in this g

4 Mar 2026, 20:58 UTC203 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

In light of Jeremy and friends getting everyone around them doxxed, I was reminded of this exchange back in 2022. Interesting turn of events wouldn't you say? https://dailyrake.ca/2022/06/02/raging-dissident-revealed-as-raging-faggot-after-larping-as-a-leet-double-haxxor-and-im-fight-me-irl-posting/

21 Feb 2026, 18:43 UTC186 viewsread 8 August 2026

> Two faggots putting hands on a third faggot. How long before these pride boys start kissing and stick dildos up their asses again?

21 Feb 2026, 18:40 UTC178 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @therobprimoVideo

We will have our home again. T.me/therobprimo

19 Feb 2026, 04:11 UTC153 viewsread 8 August 2026

It's great to observe these homos from Second Sons go through the exact same thing we went through 4-5 years ago. It's so wonderful in fact, that we're going to encourage their detractors to pull them limb from limb. 🥤😎🍿

19 Feb 2026, 04:09 UTC134 viewsread 8 August 2026

This isn't the time to praise these gatekeepers because they're starting to sound like us, it's the time to fucking bury them. Instead of praising these parasites like many are for doing the bare fucking minimum, we should be launching an all out campaign to expose their bullshit and finish the conservative influencer once and for all. These people are the last line of defense before we smash through the walls of th

18 Jan 2026, 21:15 UTC176 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

Your average Worldstar video has more appeal than this Pride Boy slop. If they weren't in a column marching through the concrete jungle yelling at cement buildings, no one would pay any attention to them. In fact, no one other than the CBC or CAHN did.

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @ragingdissidentiii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Fed MacKenzie & Mi'kmaq Morgan feat. The Goof Patrol and Pride Boys” (@ragingdissidentiii), 147 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ragingdissidentiii.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.