Both pics have surfaced in the past week, Enough said. If you want to join the only ideologically Pro-White group in Canada, join the Nationalist-13 Vanguard: [email protected]

Channel
Fed MacKenzie & Mi'kmaq Morgan feat. The Goof Patrol and Pride Boys
@ragingdissidentiii
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
147subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002414662104 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ragingdissidentiii |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ragingdissidentiii |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:37 | 147 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 148 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:37 | 148 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 10 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 23.8%
- avg views ÷ 147 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 35.0
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (10 January 2026 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 35 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 20:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 40s
- Average length
- 50s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
File, posted without a caption
Canada’s Deep State Double Take: Heritage Front vs Second Sons How a spy helped build a white nationalist movement — and how the same script is playing out again. We’ll compare: 🕵️♂️ Grant Bristow, aka Donald Best the covert CSIS asset inside the Heritage Front vs. 🪖 Jeremy Mackenzie, leader of the Second Sons of Canada Are we watching nationalism, or are we watching an updated script? Join us as we break down: …
CanuckLaw has put an incredible amount of time into breaking down how Diagolon / SSC is a fedop! Def worth watching & sharing! https://youtu.be/OCMyuU6Qygw?si=kPoaJY_lYDrZGMjg
Imagine suing a jew because he speculated that you were a fed, only to have the judge side with the jew, and dismiss your case while awarding the jew $5700 in restitution. Tell me again how Jeremy isn't a federal informant, all of his supporters are now guilty by association and are rats by proxy. - Total Anon Victory
Here's the entire testimony of Jeremy Mackenzie in regard to the federal inquiry into the Emergencies Act invocation: https://www.youtube.com/live/72WlY30tr-o?si=_IHnO8XjdA6YBTXY&t=16860 Here's the exact moment he admits to ratting on other groups and states he would be more than willing to assist the police in the future: https://www.youtube.com/live/72WlY30tr-o?si=chVknBSGKN8h5Uxj&t=24071 Which resulted in this g…
In light of Jeremy and friends getting everyone around them doxxed, I was reminded of this exchange back in 2022. Interesting turn of events wouldn't you say? https://dailyrake.ca/2022/06/02/raging-dissident-revealed-as-raging-faggot-after-larping-as-a-leet-double-haxxor-and-im-fight-me-irl-posting/
> Two faggots putting hands on a third faggot. How long before these pride boys start kissing and stick dildos up their asses again?
We will have our home again. T.me/therobprimo
It's great to observe these homos from Second Sons go through the exact same thing we went through 4-5 years ago. It's so wonderful in fact, that we're going to encourage their detractors to pull them limb from limb. 🥤😎🍿
This isn't the time to praise these gatekeepers because they're starting to sound like us, it's the time to fucking bury them. Instead of praising these parasites like many are for doing the bare fucking minimum, we should be launching an all out campaign to expose their bullshit and finish the conservative influencer once and for all. These people are the last line of defense before we smash through the walls of th…
Your average Worldstar video has more appeal than this Pride Boy slop. If they weren't in a column marching through the concrete jungle yelling at cement buildings, no one would pay any attention to them. In fact, no one other than the CBC or CAHN did.
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @ragingdissidentiii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fed MacKenzie & Mi'kmaq Morgan feat. The Goof Patrol and Pride Boys” (@ragingdissidentiii), 147 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ragingdissidentiii.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.