Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ธ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ป๐—ฎโœž

Channel

๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ธ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ป๐—ฎโœž

@rafikovna1

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

98subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001683522574
TypeChannel
Username@rafikovna1
Created13 August 2022 โ€” measured โ€” cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/rafikovna1

Growth

98100997 August 2026 โ€” 99 subscribers9 August 2026 โ€” 99 subscribers22 August 2026 โ€” 100 subscribers30 August 2026 โ€” 98 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 22 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 98โ€“100 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 05:2698-2
22 Aug 2026, 15:42100+1
9 Aug 2026, 11:1699no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:5899first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ€” we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
35s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ€” not this channelโ€™s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโ€™s own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

56 reactions across 5 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค1017.9%
๐Ÿ”ฅ1017.9%
๐Ÿ˜1017.9%
customย 5235894300117582421814.3%
customย 523332701348117321847.14%
๐Ÿ˜ญ47.14%
customย 540889801804691672635.36%
๐Ÿฅฐ35.36%
customย 530342190624907768623.57%
๐Ÿ’‹11.79%
๐Ÿ’˜11.79%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id โ€” no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegramโ€™s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 56 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 14:47 UTC36 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿ˜4๐Ÿ”ฅ2customย 52358943001175824212

18 Jul 2026, 22:19 UTC115 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿ”ฅ4customย 52358943001175824214๐Ÿฅฐ3customย 54088980180469167262

13 Jul 2026, 19:46 UTC139 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

ัะฐะผั‹ะน ะปัƒั‡ัˆะธะน ๐Ÿ–ค

โค7๐Ÿ˜4customย 52333270134811732184๐Ÿ˜ญ3customย 52358943001175824211

10 Jul 2026, 20:04 UTC101 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

๐Ÿ”ฅ3๐Ÿ˜2๐Ÿ’˜1๐Ÿ˜ญ1customย 53034219062490776861

7 Jul 2026, 14:35 UTC136 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ั ะผะพะธะผะธ๐Ÿซ‚

โค3๐Ÿ’‹1๐Ÿ”ฅ1customย 52358943001175824211customย 53034219062490776861customย 54088980180469167261

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @rafikovna1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ธ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ป๐—ฎโœžโ€ (@rafikovna1), 98 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rafikovna1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.