Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

📻 RADIOTOWER OMEGA

@radiotower_omega

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

387subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001165963598
TypeChannel
Username@radiotower_omega
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/radiotower_omega

Growth

3853873866 August 2026 — 385 subscribers7 August 2026 — 385 subscribers15 August 2026 — 387 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 385–387 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 03:15387+2
7 Aug 2026, 19:42385no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:03385first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.7%
avg views ÷ 387 subscribers
Avg views / post
119
1 post measured
Reaction rate
20.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026
Posts held20 (26 December 202523 July 2026)
Views total119
Reactions total24
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 22:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

298 reactions across 18 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💩7826.2%
❤‍🔥4113.8%
👏3210.7%
279.06%
custom 5208937345906123492248.05%
🙏186.04%
👎134.36%
🤮113.69%
👍93.02%
🔥93.02%
💯82.68%
62.01%
🕊41.34%
👀31.01%
👾31.01%
🤡31.01%
😐20.671%
🥰20.671%
😁10.336%
😢10.336%
3 further kinds31.01%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 298reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 December 2025 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @radiotower_omega. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 December 2025 to 23 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

23 Jul 2026, 20:47 UTC119 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Posted without readable text

💩9custom 52089373459061234927👀3👾31🤔1

2 Jul 2026, 13:39 UTC269 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026

[ ПРЕРВЁМ ТИШИНУ :: ТРАНСЦЕНДЕНТИРУЕМ ] #Культура@radiotower_omega Целый месяц постов не было. Вот кошмар. Пора прервать тишину затронувшим что-то в глубине души интервью с покойным маэстро Линчем и его самописной транскрипцией. Радиста во многом положительно и позитивно поражает та доброта, самоотверженность и покой, что сопровождал Линча всю его — по меньшей мере, публичную и творческую — жизнь. Говорить о симво

👏6❤‍🔥5🙏4💩3

9 May 2026, 11:21 UTC334 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Чтобы понять, в чем заключается разница между этими состояниями сознания [сном и бодрствованием], вернемся к первому из них, ко сну. Это — целиком субъективное состояние сознания. Человек погружен во сны, и совсем не важно, помнит он их или нет. Даже если до него доходят какие-то реальные впечатления (звуки, тепло, холод, ощущение собственного тела, голоса), они пробуждают в нем только фантастические субъективные обр

🔥9🙏5❤‍🔥4💩3🤡3

5 May 2026, 20:41 UTC486 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026

[ О ГНОСТИЧЕСКОМ ЕПИСКОПЕ СТЕФАНЕ ХЁЛЛЕРЕ ] #Новости@radiotower_omega #Культура@radiotower_omega Gnosticism is not a belief system in the accustomed sense, and therefore it is not easy to describe its features as you ask. The Gnostic tradition has no single prophet or founding revelator; rather it is based in the mystical experiences of a number of visionary individuals. These mystical experiences were generally cha

❤‍🔥5💩54🕊43😢1😨1

13 Apr 2026, 18:42 UTC338 views23 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

[ «НЕТ» ВАВИЛОНСКОЙ БАШНЕ ] #Философия@radiotower_omega #Новости@radiotower_omega Вероятнее всего, миф о «вавилонской башне», разделившей людей по языкам, тем или иным образом относится к той же тематической когорте, чьим основным нарративом является искусственное разделение людей, способствующее их контролю и использованию со стороны лиц, имеющих власть. К когорте сей относится и религиозный вопрос, и национальный

7💩6custom 52089373459061234925❤‍🔥4🥱1

20 Mar 2026, 20:30 UTC343 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

[ ГНОЗИС ОБЩИЙ :: ИНИЦИАЦИЯ КАК ОРГАНИЗАЦИЯ ] #Философия@radiotower_omega #Культура@radiotower_omega В это равноденствие Радист поделится наблюдениями и мыслями по поводу инициатических организаций. У людей в том или ином смысле верующих — причём веры самых разных проявлений, — порой происходит своего рода кризис среднего возраста / религиозный кризис, вследствие чего, разочарованные и огорчённые, те начинают обра

💩5❤‍🔥3👏2🙏2👍1👎1

20 Mar 2026, 20:30 UTC412 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🖤 Если вглядываться в суть, то любая инициатическая организация есть идейно-гомогенное общество с некоторыми формальными или неформальными уровнями допуска, предоставляющими определённые привилегии. Таковой организацией может быть как политическая партия, построенная вокруг некоторой философии и Традиции, так и полноценный масонский орден; как локальный кружок любителей оккультизма, так и вся организация неоязычников

❤‍🔥6💩5👏4🙏3👎1

11 Mar 2026, 13:06 UTC279 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026

[ ОТХОД НА СЕВЕР ] #Техническое@radiotower_omega и немного #Политика Как могли заметить дорогие Слушатели, RADIOTOWER молчит практически целый месяц, посему Радист решил внести некоторую ясность насчёт состояния сего важного проекта / блога / канала. 👁 Первое и наиболее важное — Радиобашня «Омега» не собирается закрываться концептуально. Проект прошёл немало критических стадий роста и развития, изменивших его суть

custom 52089373459061234928❤‍🔥6💩5👏3

10 Feb 2026, 20:09 UTCviews —

📻 RADIOTOWER OMEGA pinned «[ СОЦИАЛЬНЫЕ СВЯЗИ ] #Омега_Культура 🔑 Радиобашня существует как открытое культурное, экзо- и эзотерическое пространство, стремящееся к изучению природы бытия и реальности в условиях Новых Тёмных Веков, а также к разработке знаний, тех или иных, имеющих…»

10 Feb 2026, 20:09 UTC396 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026

[ СОЦИАЛЬНЫЕ СВЯЗИ ] #Омега_Культура 🔑 Радиобашня существует как открытое культурное, экзо- и эзотерическое пространство, стремящееся к изучению природы бытия и реальности в условиях Новых Тёмных Веков, а также к разработке знаний, тех или иных, имеющих ценность для сторонников идей Омеги, изложенных в Манифесте. Радиобашня также агитирует за гуманизм как общечеловеческую философию, исследует различные культурные я

💩54❤‍🔥3👏3🙏1

8 Feb 2026, 14:41 UTC338 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Poll

Обзор на какую книгу Вы бы хотели увидеть в ближайшее время N?

  1. 🏰 Наталия Осояну — «Румынские мифы»30%
  2. 🪄 Наталия Осояну — «Балканские мифы»20%
  3. 🇰🇷 Кёндок Ли — «Корейская мифология»27%
  4. ✡️ Михаил Вогмат — «Древнееврейские мифы»60%
  5. Предложить своё в комментариях3%

The shares total 140%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

💩2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @radiotower_omega. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Feb 2026, 14:41 UTCAnonymous Poll30 voters

Обзор на какую книгу Вы бы хотели увидеть в ближайшее время N?

  1. 🏰 Наталия Осояну — «Румынские мифы»30%
  2. 🪄 Наталия Осояну — «Балканские мифы»20%
  3. 🇰🇷 Кёндок Ли — «Корейская мифология»27%
  4. ✡️ Михаил Вогмат — «Древнееврейские мифы»60%
  5. Предложить своё в комментариях3%

The shares total 140%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 December 2025 to 23 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,159,820 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“📻 RADIOTOWER OMEGA” (@radiotower_omega), 387 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/radiotower_omega.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.