Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Радио Арктика

@radioarctic

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,610subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001749593365
TypeChannel
Username@radioarctic
Created5 August 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/radioarctic

Growth

1,6101,6111,610.57 Aug 2026, 08:15 — 1,611 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 05:56 — 1,610 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 08:158 Aug 2026, 05:56
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,610–1,611 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 05:561,610-1
7 Aug 2026, 08:151,611first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 13 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.1%
avg views ÷ 1,610 subscribers
Avg views / post
307
1 post measured
Reaction rate
23.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026
Posts held9 (13 April 202524 July 2026)
Views total307
Reactions total73
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 33s
Average length
38s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

998 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
79779.9%
👍18418.4%
🤣121.20%
😱50.501%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 998reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2025 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 18:27 UTC307 views73 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @aari_officialVideo

🐧Антарктические пробки Группа императорских пингвинов поднималась в гору – у многих на лапках яйца. По пути возникла редкая ситуация – пингвины поспорили, кто должен пройти первым, из-за чего образовалась пробка. Впрочем, разобрались довольно быстро. Движение возобновлено, яйца целы. Порядок в Антарктиде восстановлен. Видео: Игорь Савва, ААНИИ AARI ЛЁД в МАХ|VK

50👍13🤣10

2 Mar 2026, 06:27 UTC≈1,000 views127 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @PPPFJJJPhoto

Мир катится в бездну, но именно поэтому каждый маленький акт доброты становится якорем. Ни один акт доброты, каким бы незначительным он ни был, никогда не бывает напрасным. Эзоп В Антарктиде это чувствуешь особенно остро: поделился последней пачкой чая с товарищем — и уже теплее внутри. Просто написал человеку «спасибо» — и у него в голове прояснился туман. Маленькие добрые дела — как снежинки: по отдельности незамет

105👍22

15 Oct 2025, 09:06 UTC≈1,630 views157 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @polarhomePhoto

Первый поморник К нам прилетел первый поморник после зимы. Это наш давний знакомый с гравировкой на кольце «РХЗ», и у него ещё есть особая примета - порванная перепонка на лапе. Его знают все полярники со станции Беллинсгаузен. Уже несколько лет подряд этот поморник прилетает в числе первых и занимает территорию около полярной станции. Ведь жизнь вблизи станции насыщена событиями и интересными моментами. У полярник

120👍35🤣2

29 Sept 2025, 14:54 UTC≈1,480 views87 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @paulsen_moscowPhoto

Дорогие читатели, наша книга «Антарктида. Станция Восток» вошла в шорт-лист премии Правительства Москва имени Корнея Чуковского! Всего в коротком списке 48 книг в семи номинациях. Авторы лучших произведений по итогам голосования «активных граждан» и экспертного отбора получат денежное вознаграждение, а книги пополнят фонды столичных библиотек. Проголосовать за книги из шорт-листа можно до 14 октября. Спасибо за ва

65👍22

27 Sept 2025, 11:13 UTC≈1,360 views113 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @northern_logisticsVideo

🧸 Рум-тур от чукотских медведей! Косолапые поселились на заброшенной полярной станции острова Колючин. Кадры сняли при помощи дрона с судна «Профессор Хромов». Сколько мишек насчитали? 🐾 📹 Вадим Махоров Увези меня на Север

83👍25😱5

20 Apr 2025, 14:54 UTC≈2,360 views147 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Куличи, похожие на Холмы Ларсеманн - прекрасный оазис в Антарктиде. Автор - шеф-повар станции Прогресс 69-ой РАЭ. Христос Воскресе!

133👍14

20 Apr 2025, 09:24 UTC≈1,780 views115 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @polarhomePhoto

Церковь в Антарктиде Крестный ход Храм Святой Троицы на нашей станции Беллинсгаузен. Единственная православная церковь в Антарктиде, самый южный приход. Священник зимует и проводит службы. Ночью на праздник приехали соседи (да, на острове мы не одни). Стояли службу, потом ели кулич и били яйца, пели песни. Пасха. Христос воскресе

102👍13

19 Apr 2025, 18:43 UTC≈1,520 views110 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @spitsbergen_miscPhoto

Шпицберген в ожидании Пасхи 📸 Зинаида Попова

90👍20

13 Apr 2025, 18:17 UTC≈1,900 views69 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

И ещё одна серия фотографий - от Саши Жукова 💖

49👍20

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @radioarctic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Радио Арктика” (@radioarctic), 1,610 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/radioarctic.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.