Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for رادیو حامی ، مهدوی 🍎

Channel

رادیو حامی ، مهدوی 🍎

@radio_derakhtesib

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

267subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002380878495
TypeChannel
Username@radio_derakhtesib
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/radio_derakhtesib

Growth

266267266.56 August 2026 — 266 subscribers7 August 2026 — 266 subscribers13 August 2026 — 267 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 266–267 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 17:18267+1
7 Aug 2026, 00:32266no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:48266first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.8%
avg views ÷ 267 subscribers
Avg views / post
71.5
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held20 (18 June 202627 July 2026)
Views total143
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 00:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

8 reactions across 7 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 21:36 UTC43 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @psycho_CoachingPhoto

#طرحواره_درمانی #طرحواره_درمانی_تحلیلی #طرحواره_محرومیت_هیجانی #محمدرضا_مهدوی_روانشناس_بالینی ادامه طرحواره ها در کانال https://t.me/psycho_Coaching

22 Jul 2026, 06:38 UTC100 viewsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

🍎👇🍏 #طرحواره‌درمانی #نیازهای‌هیجانی‌بنیادی #محمدرضا‌مهدوی #روانشناسی https://t.me/radio_derakhtesib https://t.me/psycho_Coaching

17 Jul 2026, 10:47 UTC109 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @psycho_CoachingPhoto

🍎 برخی از مراجعان از من می پرسند چرا من به جای استفاده از اصطلاح " خیانت " از اصطلاح " عهد شکنی " استفاده می کنم. لازم دونستم در مورد این موضوع نکاتی رو با مخاطبان و مراجعان در میان بگذارم. ارادتمند #محمدرضا_مهدوی_روانشناس_بالینی #طرحواره_درمانی_تحلیلی 🖊از نگاه روان‌شناسی بالینی، عهدشکنی و خیانت همپوشانی دارند، اما یکسان نیستند. تفاوت اصلی در این است که عهدشکنی مفهومی گسترده‌تر است و خیانت یکی از شدیدترین انواع عهد

1

18 Jun 2026, 06:12 UTC231 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🍎🌱 پایان مبحث کمال‌گرایی یا کامل گرایی 🌱🍎

1

18 Jun 2026, 06:12 UTC168 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

درمان کمال گرایی با رویکرد CBT محمدرضا مهدوی پارت بیست و چهارم https://t.me/radio_derakhtesib

1

18 Jun 2026, 06:12 UTC170 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

درمان کمال گرایی با رویکرد CBT محمدرضا مهدوی پارت بیست و پنجم https://t.me/radio_derakhtesib

1

18 Jun 2026, 06:12 UTC189 viewsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

درمان کمال گرایی با رویکرد CBT محمدرضا مهدوی پارت بیست و ششم https://t.me/radio_derakhtesib

18 Jun 2026, 06:12 UTC209 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

درمان کمال گرایی با رویکرد CBT محمدرضا مهدوی پارت بیست و هفتم https://t.me/radio_derakhtesib

1

18 Jun 2026, 06:12 UTC229 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

درمان کمال گرایی با رویکرد CBT محمدرضا مهدوی پارت بیست و هشتم #رادیو_درخت_سیب #صدای_حامی #محمدرضا_مهدوی_روانشناس_بالینی #روانپژوهشگر #آسیب_شناس_روانی https://t.me/radio_derakhtesib

2

18 Jun 2026, 06:12 UTC129 viewsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

درمان کمال گرایی با رویکرد CBT محمدرضا مهدوی پارت بیستم https://t.me/radio_derakhtesib

18 Jun 2026, 06:12 UTC127 viewsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

درمان کمال گرایی با رویکرد CBT محمدرضا مهدوی پارت بیست و یکم https://t.me/radio_derakhtesib

18 Jun 2026, 06:12 UTC137 viewsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

درمان کمال گرایی با رویکرد CBT محمدرضا مهدوی پارت بیست و دوم https://t.me/radio_derakhtesib

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @radio_derakhtesib. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 38,830 of 1,507,151entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“رادیو حامی ، مهدوی 🍎” (@radio_derakhtesib), 267 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/radio_derakhtesib.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.