Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Фемтоварищество

@radfemcomm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

591subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001965704095
TypeChannel
Username@radfemcomm
DescriptionФемтов | Кружок: https://t.me/+wK1K65laqzE3YzE6 Бот: @radfem_community_bot
Created30 September 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/radfemcomm

Growth

5917 Aug 2026, 19:58 — 591 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 03:18 — 591 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 19:588 Aug 2026, 03:18
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 590–592 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 03:18591no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:58591first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 20 March 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 September 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
2
Links
23

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

293 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
17760.4%
❤‍🔥7826.6%
💯237.85%
113.75%
👾31.02%
💊10.341%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 293reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 March 2024 to 17 September 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Sept 2024, 13:07 UTC≈2,310 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @armoradfem

🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ Аудио версии радфем литературы от Womenation в ВК • Шейла Джеффрис • Сюзан Форвард • Гейл Рубин • Косуэло Барэа и др. 𝔇𝔦𝔢 𝔴𝔢𝔦𝔰𝔢 𝔗𝔢𝔲𝔣𝔢𝔩𝔣𝔯𝔞𝔲 𝔞𝔲𝔰 𝔎𝔞𝔲𝔨𝔞𝔰𝔲𝔰

❤‍🔥144👾1💯1

5 Sept 2024, 03:01 UTC≈2,480 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @armoradfem

🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ Посмотреть расписание всех онлайн кружков 🕯Что такое кружок в формате Изба-читальня? Это кружок без требований к уровню знаний, к созвонам в котором не нужно готовиться и можно посещать когда удобно/слушать в записи. Единственное требование — гс при входе, так как радфем кружки только для женщин. На созвонах читают литературу, задают вопросы и обсуждают прочитанное. Вы можете в любой момент просить ост

7❤‍🔥4💯21👾1

4 Sept 2024, 03:01 UTC≈1,050 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @radfem_philosohpy

Формальная логика Основоположником этой логики является Аристотель. Формальная логика рассматривает мышление только как субъективную деятельность человека и выявляет правила, которым должна подчиняться эта деятельность, чтобы результатом было постижение истины. Исследованием самой истины формальная логика не занимается, она не является теорией познания. Она работает с уже готовыми суждения и получает на их основе у

14❤‍🔥2💯2

4 Sept 2024, 03:01 UTC≈1,840 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @radfem_philosohpy

Диалектическая логика Диалектическая логика является объективной логикой, наукой о разумном мышлении. Она является и теорией познания, и онтологией, и наиболее общим методом познания мира. Разумное мышление было впервые открыто Гегелем (примеры разумного мышления и ответ на вопрос как же мышление, которого нет и не может быть без человека, может быть объективным, т. е. независящим от человека и его сознания? https:/

14💯3❤‍🔥1

3 Sept 2024, 20:07 UTC≈1,050 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Женское освободительное движение популяризовало лозунг «личное — это политическое», но сама идея о том, что у частной жизни есть политическое измерение, возникла у новых левых [66]. Бунтуя против общественного порядка, в котором публичная и частная сфера строго разделены, новые левые призывали к воссоединению личного и политического. Новые левые переосмыслили проблемы, считавшиеся личными, особенно отчуждение и бесси

15❤‍🔥4💯2👾1

1 Sept 2024, 15:07 UTC830 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @revolutiONLINE

2️⃣🌟1️⃣9️⃣ 🌟ФЕМТОВАРИЩЕСТВО дата: 2.09 | понедельник время: 19:00 | по мск читаем: ❣️Андреа Дворкин – Женщины правого крыла (глава 5) ❣️Андреа Дворкин – Память Ведьм ❣️Кэрол Хэниш – Личное политическое для участия пиши в бот 👁‍🗨revolutionline | актуальное расписание онлайн радфем кружков

6❤‍🔥41

22 Aug 2024, 14:17 UTC794 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @armoradfem

🌟𝔇𝔦𝔞𝔩𝔢𝔠𝔱𝔦𝔠𝔰🌟 Диале‌ктика (др.-греч. διαλεκτική «искусство спорить, вести рассуждение» от διά «через; раздельно» + λέγω «говорю, излагаю») — метод аргументации в философии, а также форма и способ рефлексивного теоретического мышления, исследующие противоречия, обнаруживаемые в мыслимом содержании этого мышления. Диалектика – это философское учение, а также способ познания мира, основанный на детальном изучении против

❤‍🔥91

22 Aug 2024, 14:17 UTC978 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @armoradfem

🌟𝔇𝔦𝔞𝔩𝔢𝔠𝔱𝔦𝔠𝔞𝔩 𝔪𝔞𝔱𝔢𝔯𝔦𝔞𝔩𝔦𝔰𝔪🌟 Раннее мы говорили о диалектике, затрагивая в первую очередь классическую философию Гегеля. Однако, необходимо более подробно ознакомиться с материалистической диалектикой. Диалекти‌ческий материали‌зм — философское направление, базирующееся на материализме и материалистическом понимании диалектики Гегеля. Основными идеями этого направления являются: первичность материального (объективного

❤‍🔥9

11 Aug 2024, 07:10 UTC999 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Расписание всех радфем кружков https://t.me/radfem_online

83❤‍🔥2

11 Aug 2024, 07:08 UTC735 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @revolutiONLINE

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🌟LITFEM тема: классические фем труды из библиотеки тгк «die weise teufelfrau aus kaukasus» формат: изба-читальня 🌟КРУЖОК ПО ЛОГИКЕ ведущая – владелица тгк «учиться, учиться и ещё раз учиться» тема: диалектический материализм формат: изба-читальня 🌟ИСКОРКИ от создательниц проекта «рфр – радфем революционный» тема: политическая экономия формат: самостоятельное чтение, обсуждение прочитанного на созвоне,

63❤‍🔥3

28 Jul 2024, 13:22 UTC≈1,020 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @armoradfemFile

🚬Двойная опасность: женщины, армия США и война в Ираке Авторка: Шейла Джеффрис Перевод: @armoradfem Статья не просто про военный конфликт, а про суть армии как порождения патриархата и террор в отношении женщин. Перевод дался нелегко из-за тяжёлой и важной темы, поднятой авторкой. Файл уже в Библиотеке

22💊1

18 Jul 2024, 05:46 UTC≈1,580 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🌾На данный момент читаем Герду Лернер — Сотворение патриархата

24❤‍🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @radfemcomm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Mar 2024, 11:30 UTCFinal Results54 voters

В какое время в субботу вам было бы удобнее участвовать в созвонах? Время по мск (Можно выбрать несколько вариантов)

  1. 17:0039%
  2. 18:0044%
  3. 19:0052%
  4. 20:0033%
  5. 21:0039%
  6. 22:0030%

The shares total 237%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

21 Mar 2024, 11:29 UTCFinal Results51 voters

В какое время в среду вам было бы удобнее участвовать в созвонах? (Можно выбрать несколько вариантов)

  1. 19:0047%
  2. 20:0037%
  3. 21:0041%
  4. 22:0025%

The shares total 150%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

20 Mar 2024, 10:54 UTCFinal Results64 voters

В какие дни вам было бы удобно участвовать в избе-читальне? (Может отметить несколько вариантов)

  1. Понедельник17%
  2. Вторник23%
  3. Среда30%
  4. Четверг22%
  5. Пятница39%
  6. Суббота67%
  7. Воскресенье48%

The shares total 246%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 March 2024 to 17 September 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,306,131 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Фемтоварищество” (@radfemcomm), 591 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/radfemcomm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.