Channel
@radfem_confessions
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
550subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002193680151 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @radfem_confessions |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/radfem_confessions |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:04 | 550 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:02 | 550 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
339 reactions across 20 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5267087045565640715 | 131 | 38.6% | |
| custom 5213457365193480671 | 115 | 33.9% | |
| custom 5215173432261497990 | 93 | 27.4% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 339reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 November 2025 to 17 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
– #Вопросы здравствуйте, возможно, не по теме, но мне абсолютно нечего смотреть. очень хочу ищу что-нибудь годное про женщин. мне кажется (и я в этом уверена) что у девушек самый лучший вкус, поэтому спрашиваю здесь ваши любимые фильмы 🙏🏼🧞♀️🩷🦄🐽 Radfem confessions • Отправить тейк
custom 521345736519348067112custom 52670870455656407152
– #Вопросы Как радфем смотрит на анархо-фем? Желательно с обоснованной критикой💝 Radfem confessions • Отправить тейк
custom 521345736519348067110
– #Вопросы (Рент) Меня конкретно так заебала фиксация квиров и англ говорящего пространства впринципе на пенетрацию и хуй. В тт даже попадался видос мол это ваша вина что вы не наслаждайтесь гетеро сексом тк «sex is equal exchange between men and women»(which it never was but whatever). На комментарий в котором девушка написала что никогда не кончила во время процесса все писали что это её вина (каким образом я до с…
custom 526708704556564071538custom 521517343226149799016custom 52134573651934806719
– #Вопросы привет, людини, у вас есть статьи на тему как проработать жгс? Radfem confessions • Отправить тейк
custom 52134573651934806717
– #Вопросы здравствуйте! было ли у вас такое, что вы уставали/выгорали/не могли физически говорить или потреблять контент на темы феминизма/вреда патриархата и всего, что с этим связано? этап разочарования и спадения розовых очков уже был пройден, но какое то время назад пошло ещë большее разочарование, и каждая 'новая новость' на прилежащие волнующие темы просто угнетает, вызывает тошноту и лишает надежды. как вы н…
custom 521517343226149799012custom 521345736519348067111
– #Вопросы Здравствуйте, хотела спросить. Я недавно заинтересовалась в радфеме, мне очень понравились некоторые моменты в нём и я бы хотела изучить его поглубже, но как я поняла вы считаете, что все религии придуманы мужчинами и часть патриархата? Просто я вот практикующая христианка, я искренне верю, Бог отвечал на мои молитвы, я чувствую Его присутствие, я каждый день молюсь и я видела как Он меняет мою жизнь к л…
custom 526708704556564071512custom 52134573651934806714
– #Вопросы Бимбо стоицизм-норм или стрём? Radfem confessions • Отправить тейк
custom 521517343226149799010custom 52134573651934806711
Здравствуйте, женщины. Вероятно, что это не в тему канала, но я пишу везде, где можно. Есть один мошенник, который обманул мою сестру на тг подарок и таким образом, этот человек зарабатывает себе на "крутые" подарки, из-за этого человека, она была очень сильно расстроена, у неё ушло на него почти 1000 звезд. Возможно, я очень глупо сейчас выгляжу, что занимаюсь этой фигнёй и казалось бы, что это мелочь, но мне очень …
custom 521517343226149799010
– #Вопросы можете пожалуйста объяснить чем проблематично БДСМ для радфем? Radfem confessions • Отправить тейк
custom 521517343226149799010
– #Вопросы здравствуйте, извините за возможно глупый вопрос, но я знаю, что радфем критикует гетеросексуальный брак и деторождение в нем, но как радфем относится к материнству в лесбийском союзе? Radfem confessions • Отправить тейк
custom 52670870455656407158
– #Вопросы вот 'Марш шлюх' и другие акции используют откровенные наряды. такие действия помогают бороться с дискриминацией, или это скорее делает женщин объектами? можно ли вообще «безопасно» выражать сексуальность, или любая демонстрация тела автоматически попадает под мужской контроль и объективацию? (очень хочу в этом хорошо разобраться) Radfem confessions • Отправить тейк
custom 521345736519348067115custom 52670870455656407155custom 52151734322614979901
Что думаете? Radfem confessions • Отправить тейк
custom 52151734322614979903custom 52134573651934806712
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @radfem_confessions. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,108,996 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Radfem confessions” (@radfem_confessions), 550 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/radfem_confessions.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.