Channel
@racing_journalf1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
566subscribers
+50 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002151116229 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @racing_journalf1 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/racing_journalf1 |
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 03:15 | 566 | -9 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 07:20 | 575 | -18 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:05 | 593 | +19 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 05:07 | 574 | -5 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 14:24 | 579 | +62 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 517 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:01 | 517 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 516 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
33 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😭 | 10 | 30.3% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 15.2% | |
| 😐 | 4 | 12.1% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 12.1% | |
| custom 5253861668735172163 | 3 | 9.09% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 9.09% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 9.09% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 3.03% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇩🇪 Германия планирует вернуться в Формулу-1 На отчётной конференции по второму кварталу этого года Стефано Доменикали рассказал, что владельцы Хоккенхаймринга начали обсуждать возможность возвращения трассы в календарь. Глава Формулы-1 настроен оптимистично и считает, что возвращение состоится. Однако, как пишет The Race, гонки вернутся в Германию не раньше 2029 года и, скорее всего, по аналогии Спа/Барселона, с че…
👍3
🙂 Анонсом оказался розыгрыш двух билетов В соцсетях выберут одного победителя, который получит билеты на этапы в Сильверстоуне и Остине. @racing_journalf1
😐4
🇺🇸🇬🇧 Формула-1 и пресс-служба Трассы Америк с Сильверстоуном что-то тизерят Либо перенос Гран-при Великобритании на осень в 2027-м, либо проведение британского и американского этапа в криптоколонии в Питере в Малайзии. @racing_journalf1 #gb #us
😱4
🇧🇭🇲🇾 Ночные гонки отменяются: Гран-при Бахрейна пройдет после обеда по местному времени Руководитель автодрома Сепанг Ахзан Шафриман Хаиф опроверг слухи о вечерней гонке. Она пройдет в 15:00 по местному времени (10:00 мск). @racing_journalf1 #bh
😭5❤1🤬1
🇧🇭🇲🇾 Гонка на Сепанге будет ночной Разница между Москвой и Куала-Лумпуром составляет 5 часов. Поэтому, квалификация будет в 16:00 мск, а гонка в 15:00 мск. Продажа билетов должна стартовать в начале августа. @racing_journalf1 #bh
🎪 Доменикали о будущем финала сезона Формулы-1: Европа вместо Ближнего Востока Решение о замене Катара и Абу-Даби планируется опубликовать не раньше середины сентября: На сегодняшний день для нас гонки в Катаре и Абу-Даби подтверждены. <...> Но, конечно, если ситуация не разрешится так, как мы считаем необходимым, до середины сентября мы примем решение. Если это окажется невозможным, конец сезона будет в Европе, по…
custom 52538616687351721633
🇲🇾 Где были гонщики, когда Формула-1 последний раз приезжала на Сепанг 10 из 22 гонщиков выступали уже тогда, а 6 человек даже не начали карьеру в открытых колёсах. @racing_journalf1
😭5
🇭🇺 Гран-при Венгрии: результаты конкурса прогнозов Завершаем первую часть сезона подведением итогов нашего маленького чемпионата. Этот этап получился не таким простым, как предыдущий, никто не верил в Норриса и Стролла. Лучший результат уик-энда у Old Dolio — поздравляю! Топ-3 личного зачёта выглядит так: 🥇arika, Вовчик — 126 🥈Елена, Alevtina — 120 🥉kimeh — 119 Полная таблица доступна по ссылке: https://docs.goog…
🇭🇺 Итоги гонки на Хунгароринге Сегодняшняя гонка была почти удачной для McLaren, но Оскар сошел из-за проблем. Зато Норрис отлично провел уикенд, как и Антонелли. Ферстаппен, несмотря на критику машины, сегодня второй. Неудачный уикенд для Ferrari — пошло все не так, как планировалось. Расселл также ничего не смог сегодня сделать для подиума, провалившись на старте гонки. Зато, у Нико Хюлькенберга первые два очка …
🏆 Первая победа Ландо Норриса в этом сезоне А также первая за четыре года победа поулситтера на этой трассе. @racing_journalf1 #hu
❤4
🇧🇭 Теперь официально: Гран-при Бахрейна пройдет в Малайзии Вот такие географические открытия от Формулы-1. Гонка состоится 4 октября, так что у нас будет тройник Азербайджан-Малайзия-Сингапур. @racing_journalf1
😁3
🇩🇪 Вчера еще штраф получил Антонелли — тоже опустившись на три позиции Сегодня Расселл и Леклер будут бороться за победу против McLaren. @racing_journalf1 #hu
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @racing_journalf1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RJ🏎” (@racing_journalf1), 566 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/racing_journalf1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.